South Korea backs US-North Korea talks, firmly rejects Hormuz deployment

There will be no engagement or involvement in war.
South Korea's president rejected military deployment to the Strait of Hormuz despite U.S. pressure, responding to domestic opposition.
Mark

So Lee is saying yes to helping with North Korea talks but no to the Strait of Hormuz. Why does he need to say it three times?

Mimi

Because the domestic pressure is real. There have been protests. He's signaling to his own people that he heard them, that this line won't be crossed.

Luke

But what does "preliminary coordination" actually mean? Is Seoul already in contact with Pyongyang, or just with Washington about how to approach Pyongyang?

Mimi

The reporting says Seoul is doing coordination work to facilitate dialogue between North Korea and the US. It's not entirely clear if that's direct contact with the North or mediation through other channels.

Mark

And Trump says he wants to meet Kim later this year. Does that seem likely given that North Korea hasn't clearly responded yet?

Mimi

That's the open question. Trump has a history with Kim from his first term, and he's clearly trying to revive that. But North Korea's silence is telling.

Luke

The court ordered North Korea to pay $32.5 million for blowing up that liaison office in 2020. Is that order enforceable? Can Seoul actually collect?

Mimi

The reporting doesn't address enforcement. It's a symbolic judgment as much as anything—a marker of how far relations have deteriorated.

Mark

What about the nuclear numbers? Trump says 57, South Korea says 80 to 120. That's a huge gap.

Luke

It is. And that gap matters for any negotiation. If you don't agree on the baseline, how do you negotiate reduction?

Mimi

Exactly. And North Korea's backing from Russia adds another layer of complexity that any talks would have to navigate.

Mark

So Lee's real position is: we'll help with diplomacy, but we're not going to war for you. Is that fair?

Mimi

That's fair. He's trying to maintain the alliance while respecting what his own people are telling him they won't accept.

  • Washington is pulling Seoul in two directions at once: toward military support in the Strait of Hormuz and toward diplomatic facilitation with Pyongyang, leaving South Korea little room to simply follow.
  • Street protests across South Korea have hardened public opposition to any troop deployment near Iran, forcing Lee to repeat his refusal three times in a single statement to make the message unmistakable.
  • The shadow of 2019 looms over any optimism—when Trump-Kim talks collapsed in Hanoi, years of inter-Korean momentum collapsed with them, and a Seoul court last week ordered North Korea to pay $32.5 million for demolishing the very office built to keep dialogue alive.
  • North Korea has not clearly responded to Trump's renewed overtures, and its deepening alignment with Russia complicates any path back to the negotiating table.
  • Seoul is hedging its regional position by holding its first-ever presidential summit with five Central Asian states, signaling it intends to maintain relationships across the geopolitical divide.
  • Lee's government is threading a narrow path: facilitating US-North Korea talks behind the scenes, protecting its own shipping lanes without joining a war, and building economic ties with countries aligned against its closest ally.

Caught between competing demands from Washington, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung this week drew a firm line against military entanglement in the Iran conflict while quietly positioning Seoul as a bridge-builder between the United States and North Korea. His triple-repeated refusal to send troops to the Strait of Hormuz reflects a domestic society unwilling to be drawn into distant wars, even at the cost of alliance friction. Meanwhile, the prospect of renewed Trump-Kim diplomacy reopens a chapter that closed abruptly in Hanoi in 2019—this time with a Korean peninsula carrying far more nuclear weight than before.

South Korean President Lee Jae Myung found himself this week navigating two contradictory demands from Washington. On the question of Iran, he was unequivocal: South Korea would not send troops to the Strait of Hormuz. He said so three times in a single statement, a deliberate repetition aimed at quieting domestic protests that have swept the country in recent weeks. Seoul's involvement would be limited to protecting its own merchant vessels and oil shipping—national interest, not alliance warfare.

On North Korea, the posture was more open. Lee confirmed that Trump has expressed a clear desire to revive dialogue with Kim Jong Un, and that Seoul is already working behind the scenes to help facilitate preliminary coordination between Washington and Pyongyang. The diplomatic stakes are considerable: Trump has acknowledged North Korea holds 57 nuclear weapons, while South Korean intelligence estimates the figure may be between 80 and 120 warheads.

The history is sobering. The last moment of genuine momentum—the 2018 inter-Korean thaw—collapsed when Trump and Kim's Hanoi summit fell apart in February 2019. The relationship has deteriorated sharply since. Last week, a Seoul court ordered North Korea to pay $32.5 million for destroying the Inter-Korean Liaison Office in 2020, a building that had been built precisely to keep communication alive. North Korea has since drawn closer to Russia and has not clearly responded to Trump's current overtures.

Beyond these two pressure points, Seoul held its first-ever presidential summit with five Central Asian states, deepening economic ties with countries aligned with Moscow—a signal that South Korea is trying to preserve relationships across a fractured geopolitical landscape. Whether Trump's planned meeting with Kim materializes, and whether Seoul's quiet coordination work bears any fruit, remains an open question.

South Korean President Lee Jae Myung stood at a crossroads this week, caught between two demands from Washington that pulled in opposite directions. On Friday, he announced that Seoul would actively work to broker talks between the United States and North Korea—a diplomatic mission he framed as both uncertain and worth pursuing. But on the question of military involvement in the Iran conflict, he was unambiguous. South Korea would not send troops to the Strait of Hormuz, he said, repeating the point three times in a single statement to ensure no misunderstanding: "There will be no dispatch of troops that will lead to involvement in a conflict. There will be no engagement or involvement in war."

The diplomatic opening with Pyongyang rests on Trump's stated desire to revive the relationship he cultivated during his first term. Trump has said he plans to meet with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un later this year and has emphasized the importance of maintaining good relations with him. The U.S. president acknowledged that North Korea now possesses 57 nuclear weapons, which he described as "very powerful." South Korean intelligence assessments put the figure higher—between 80 and 120 warheads—suggesting the scale of what any negotiation would need to address. Lee said that while dialogue between Washington and Pyongyang remained uncertain, it was far from impossible. Seoul, he indicated, was already engaged in preliminary coordination work behind the scenes to help make such talks happen.

The history of these negotiations casts a long shadow. Inter-Korean relations had reached a peak in 2018, when the peninsula seemed poised for a thaw. But when talks between Kim and Trump collapsed in February 2019, the momentum evaporated. The deterioration has been steep. Last Thursday, a Seoul court ordered North Korea to pay approximately $32.5 million for destroying the Inter-Korean Liaison Office building in 2020—a facility that had been established to improve relations between the two countries. The destruction of that building, ordered by Pyongyang amid rising tensions, became a symbol of how far the relationship had fallen.

North Korea has grown closer to Russia in recent years, securing critical backing from Moscow that has shifted the regional balance. The country has not yet clearly responded to Trump's overtures, leaving the question of whether Pyongyang is interested in renewed dialogue still open.

The refusal to deploy troops to the Strait of Hormuz, by contrast, reflects domestic pressure that Lee could not ignore. Protests have erupted across South Korea in recent weeks, with citizens opposing any military involvement in the Iran conflict. Lee's government found itself at odds with significant portions of Korean society over the question. His repeated denials of any troop deployment were clearly meant to settle the matter domestically. South Korea will limit its involvement to what Lee called "minimum necessary activities" to protect its own merchant vessels and oil shipping routes—a distinction meant to separate legitimate national interest from participation in a broader conflict.

Meanwhile, Seoul is also working to strengthen its position in the region through other channels. The country held its first-ever presidential summit with five Central Asian states on Wednesday, seeking to deepen economic ties with countries that have aligned themselves with Russia. The move suggests South Korea is trying to maintain relationships across the geopolitical divide, even as it navigates pressure from its closest ally.

Lee's position this week amounts to a careful balancing act: yes to facilitating dialogue with North Korea, no to military involvement in Iran, and continued efforts to build relationships with other regional powers. Whether Trump's planned meeting with Kim Jong Un actually materializes, and whether Seoul's coordination efforts bear fruit, remains to be seen.

Trump clearly wants dialogue with North Korea, and while such talks are uncertain, they are not impossible.
— South Korean President Lee Jae Myung
There will be no dispatch of troops that will lead to involvement in a conflict. There will be no engagement or involvement in war.
— South Korean President Lee Jae Myung
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em Al Jazeera ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ