For millions of people, the number on a smartwatch wrist has quietly become a kind of authority — shaping meals, rest days, and the quiet arithmetic of personal health. A new scientific study now challenges that authority, finding that popular smartwatches consistently overestimate calories burned during exercise, with Garmin's devices showing the widest gap between claimed and actual energy expenditure. It is a reminder that precision in display is not the same as accuracy in truth, and that the tools we trust most deserve the scrutiny we rarely give them.
Google News
· Sep 03, 2026
· technology
· 1 min de leitura
High
Apuração: Verificado
Smartwatch Calorie Counters Unreliable, Garmin Worst Among Brands Tested
◉
Science & Space
7580 artigos relacionados
NASA Launches Artemis II: Four Astronauts Head to Moon in Historic Mis…
Devdiscourse · 100% correspondência
Blue Origin protests NASA's $2.9B lunar lander contract award to Space…
Cable News Network · 99% correspondência
Blue Origin rocket explosion threatens NASA's lunar ambitions
BBC News · 99% correspondência
Artemis II Data Reveals How Astronauts Adapt to Lunar Gravity
Mirage News · 99% correspondência
NASA Names Four Astronauts for Artemis III Lunar Lander Test Mission
NDTV Profit · 99% correspondência
Cobertura Relacionada
Space Daily · Sep 04
At 107, the world's oldest barber still cut hair five days a week
Anthony Mancinelli, certified as the world's oldest working barber at 96, continued cutting hair full-time until age 107…
chemeurope.com · Sep 04 Scientists Discover 'Pac-Man Enzyme' That Degrades Plastic and AntibioticsUniversity of Konstanz researchers discovered a "Pac-Man enzyme" in bacteria that breaks down polyester plastics and bio…
timesofindia.indiatimes.com · Sep 04 ISRO's GSLV-F17 Successfully Deploys EOS-05 to Geosynchronous OrbitISRO's GSLV-F17 rocket successfully placed India's first geosynchronous imaging satellite EOS-05 into orbit from Srihari…
News-Medical · Sep 04 UFC Fighters Dramatically Shift Diet Across Weigh-In Cycle, Study FindsA study of 107 professional MMA fighters reveals highly structured eating patterns, with severe carbohydrate and fluid r…
Viés e Enquadramento
⚖
Article presents scientific findings about smartwatch inaccuracy with sensationalized framing; lacks manufacturer response, study methodology details, and context on practical utility.
Bias Direction
center-left
Confidence
MED
Sensationalism through accusatory language ('lying,' 'unreliable') and aggregation of similar headlines to amplify negative findings. Frames technical limitation as consumer deception rather than device capability constraint.
lying to you
lying about
can't trust
worst among brands
significantly overestimate
Garmin's response or explanation for performance differences
Study methodology, sample size, and limitations
Context on whether overestimation affects practical fitness goals
Perspective from other tested brands
Historical accuracy improvements in smartwatch technology
Expert commentary on acceptable margin of error for fitness tracking
Impacto Geopolítico
🌎
Consumer technology reliability issue with no geopolitical significance; smartwatch calorie tracking inaccuracy is a domestic market/health concern unrelated to international relations.
Escalation Risk
low
Confidence
HIGH
Lente Econômica
📈
Smartwatch calorie counters significantly overestimate energy expenditure, with Garmin showing worst accuracy. This undermines device reliability and may impact consumer trust in wearable fitness technology.
Market Signal
bearish
Confidence
HIGH
Consumer Electronics/Wearables
Fitness Technology
Health & Wellness
Smartwatch Manufacturing
Consumers relying on smartwatch data for fitness goals, weight management, and dietary decisions may make suboptimal health choices based on inflated calorie burn estimates. This could reduce perceived value and satisfaction with wearable devices, particularly Garmin products.
Potential regulatory scrutiny regarding accuracy standards and health claims for wearable devices. FTC may investigate misleading marketing claims. Could lead to industry standards for calorie estimation accuracy or mandatory disclaimers about device limitations.