Slam Frank: The Anne Frank rap musical that's dividing theater audiences

We can do plays that make people uncomfortable, and say the things that have been left unsaid
Director Sam LaFrage on what the show represents about artistic freedom in the current moment.
Mark

So the core idea is that a progressive theater company tries to update Anne Frank's story by making her Latina, pansexual, and an immigrant. That's the satire?

Mimi

That's the frame. The show-within-a-show lets them mock the impulse to retrofit historical suffering through contemporary identity categories without the creators having to say what they actually think.

Luke

But do we know what they actually think? The article says they deliberately avoid ideology. That's a choice, but it's not nothing—it's a choice to let the audience project.

Mark

Why avoid taking a stance?

Mimi

Sinensky says they were tired of didactic theater, of work that tells you exactly what to feel. They wanted to make something that provokes reactions, not conclusions.

Luke

That's fair, but it also means the show can be read as anti-woke or pro-woke depending on who's watching. Is that artistic ambiguity or is it just letting everyone see what they want?

Mimi

Probably both. The Reddit reviews prove it—people across the spectrum claim it validates their view.

Mark

What about the Holocaust itself? Is the show actually about Anne Frank or is she just a vehicle?

Mimi

She's almost incidental. The show is really about how progressive discourse has become abstract and disconnected from actual human connection.

Luke

So it's a critique of progressive theater, not a reimagining of Frank's story.

Mimi

Right. The final twenty minutes apparently expand beyond satire into something darker, which is where people start walking out.

Mark

Do we know what happens?

Luke

The article doesn't say. It just calls it "audacious" and "controversial." That's a gap.

Mark

Fair. But the fact that even the cast had to think through why they were uncomfortable with it—that suggests it's doing something real.

  • The show was born from a single absurd tweet claiming Anne Frank had benefited from white privilege—an image so jarring it crystallized for composer Andrew Fox everything that had gone wrong with identity-driven cultural discourse.
  • Before a single ticket was sold, Slam Frank was already polarizing: its social media strategy of deliberate misdirection drew Reddit accusations of being simultaneously pro-Zionist, antisemitic, far-right, and far-left, sometimes within the same thread.
  • The production's irreverence is total—audiences enter through a bookcase replica of the Franks' hideout beneath a neon sign reading 'The Attic,' and onstage characters deliver speeches in nearly impenetrable academic jargon that the show holds up as a symptom of culture becoming 'less human and more abstract.'
  • A sold-out workshop run, a visit from Patti LuPone, and a rave from former Times critic Ben Brantley suggest the show has landed—but a contentious final act that widens its satirical target keeps the wound open and the debate unresolved.
  • The deeper question the show leaves hanging is whether its audiences are laughing because they recognize a cultural pathology worth correcting, or because they were already drifting toward indifference about the Holocaust itself.

In the long human struggle to hold history sacred while remaining honest about the present, a satirical musical called Slam Frank has arrived off-Broadway asking an uncomfortable question: what happens when the language meant to honor suffering becomes so abstracted it loses its humanity? Created by Andrew Fox and Joel Sinensky, the show uses a play-within-a-play to lampoon progressive theater's impulse to retrofit Anne Frank's story through contemporary identity frameworks—casting her as a pansexual Latina rapper, her father as neurodivergent, their Amsterdam hiding place as an immigrant refuge. Opening at New York's Orpheum Theatre in October 2026, the production has drawn praise, walkouts, and accusations from every corner of the political spectrum, which its creators regard as the surest sign they have done something true.

Andrew Fox was scrolling Twitter in 2022 when he encountered a post arguing that Anne Frank had benefited from white privilege. The absurdity lodged in him. A composer and lyricist, Fox brought the idea to writer Joel Sinensky, a collaborator from his school days, and together they built a musical around it: a play within a play, in which a well-meaning progressive theater company attempts to modernize Frank's story by recasting her as a pansexual Latina rapper, her mother as Black, her father as neurodivergent, and the family's Amsterdam hideout as an immigrant refuge. The result, Slam Frank, sold out a workshop run at a New York comedy club in 2025 before opening off-Broadway at the Orpheum Theatre in October 2026.

From the start, Fox and Sinensky resisted the urge to deliver a verdict. Where much recent commercial theater tells audiences exactly what to feel, they wanted to write something that pushed back against that reflex. Their social media strategy was a deliberate exercise in ambiguity—an Instagram post on Yom Kippur declared 'Fasting is Fatphobic'—and it worked. Online reviewers labeled them pro-Zionist and antisemitic, right-wing and left-wing, sometimes in the same breath. 'That, to me, is one of the best indicators that we succeeded,' Sinensky says.

The production's physical world matches its conceptual audacity. Audiences enter the Orpheum through a replica of the bookcase that concealed the Frank family, welcomed by a neon sign reading 'The Attic.' Director Sam LaFrage, who once made drag queen family theater, describes the show as a corrective to his own past, a reminder that art is allowed to make people uncomfortable. Non-binary actor Olivia Bernábe, who plays Anita, found the show through Fox's TikTok and stayed for the music. 'What the show plays with,' Bernábe says, 'is the idea of your identity equaling your ethics—because that's just not true.'

Onstage, characters speak in nearly impenetrable progressive jargon—'through what assemblage of counter-hegemonic labor shall the scaffolding of our interlocking systems of oppression be rendered obsolete?'—and Fox intends every syllable as a diagnosis. He believes this mode of speech has made culture less human and more abstract, and the show is his argument in musical form. Reviews have been largely warm: Ben Brantley called it possibly the most important new show around, and Patti LuPone came backstage moved after the workshop. Yet the final twenty minutes, which expand the satire beyond historical parody into what Fox calls 'contemporary excoriation,' remain the most contested section, dividing even members of the cast.

Fox has received emails accusing him of making people stop taking the Holocaust seriously. His answer is unsettling: people were already moving in that direction. Whether Slam Frank is a corrective to that drift or a symptom of it is the question the show refuses to answer for you.

Andrew Fox was scrolling through Twitter in 2022 when he found a tweet arguing that Anne Frank had benefited from white privilege. The absurdity stuck with him. A composer and lyricist, Fox decided to build a musical around that ridiculous debate—a hip-hop show that would take the impulse to retrofit historical suffering through the lens of contemporary identity politics and see where the logic broke down. He reconnected with Joel Sinensky, a writer he'd known since school, and together they landed on a structure: a play within a play, where a well-meaning progressive theater company attempts to modernize Frank's story by casting her as a pansexual Latina, her mother as Black, her father as neurodivergent, and the family's hiding place in Amsterdam as an immigrant refuge. The result is Slam Frank, which premiered in a sold-out workshop run at the Asylum NYC comedy club in 2025 and opens off-Broadway proper at the Orpheum theatre on October 4.

The show arrived controversial before anyone had seen it. Fox and Sinensky had no interest in delivering a sermon. "A lot of the work that's been made commercially in the last decade has been very direct about what you're supposed to take away from it," Sinensky says, "and we wanted to write something that was a reaction to that." They borrowed Hamilton's visual language and rap sensibility—the logo itself echoes the blockbuster bio-musical—but pointedly rejected its clarity of purpose. The production's social media, managed by Fox, became a masterclass in misdirection. An Instagram post shared on Yom Kippur read: "Fasting is Fatphobic." Fox, who is Jewish, had committed early to never conveying "a specific viewpoint or message." The strategy worked. Reddit reviews labeled Fox and Sinensky as pro-Zionist, antisemitic, extremist right-wing, extremist left-wing—sometimes in the same thread. "That, to me, is one of the best indicators that we succeeded," Sinensky says, "that people can see it and love it or get angry for different reasons."

The show's irreverence extends to its physical staging. The entrance to the Orpheum's auditorium has been designed to resemble the bookcase that concealed the Frank family's hideout, with a neon sign reading "The Attic" welcoming audiences inside. Director Sam LaFrage, who previously made drag queen family theater downtown, speaks of the production as a corrective to his own "woke" past. "I get really excited by something that makes me feel like art is back," he says. "Like, we can do plays that make people uncomfortable, and say the things that have been left unsaid because we've been worried about getting canceled." Walker Stovall, an actor in the ensemble, echoes the sentiment. "When Trump got elected, obviously that was awful, but I let woke get the best of me," he says. "You should be critical about the way you think and about what you're taught, but I think when I was letting it get in the way of connecting with other people is when it all went bad."

Fox sees the show as a portrait of how progressive discourse has become detached from human connection. Many characters speak in nearly incomprehensible jargon—at one point, someone asks "through what assemblage of counter-hegemonic labor shall the scaffolding of our interlocking systems of oppression be rendered obsolete?" It's a parody of a real mode of speech, one that Fox believes has made culture "less human and more abstract." The show was once rejected from a BMI music workshop, Fox says, specifically because of a non-binary coming-out song—despite the fact that no non-binary people were in the room that year. The next year, after new non-binary members joined, the same song became their favorite in the show. Olivia Bernábe, the non-binary actor playing Anita, discovered the musical through Fox's TikTok videos and thought it was "just an intense commit-to-the-bit, but with really good music." They find the number "hysterical." "I know that there are people who do get offended," Bernábe says. "There have been a couple of times where people have walked out; I don't know if they forget that it's satire, or it could be that everyone has a different threshold for it. We are teasing, but not actually making fun of the identity. What the show plays with is the idea of your identity equaling your ethics, because that's just not true."

Reviews have been largely positive. Ben Brantley, the former New York Times theater critic, called it "may be the most important new show around." Patti LuPone visited the workshop and came backstage moved. Yet the final twenty minutes remain the most contentious. A plot twist widens the show's scope from historical satire to what Fox calls "contemporary excoriation." Stovall initially resisted. "My gut instinct was, 'Don't do this to my girls,'" he says, half joking. But he came to see its necessity. "The reason I had a problem with it is why I think it's important to put it onstage, right?"

Fox believes the culture has shifted. He paraphrases Rick Rubin's observation that ideas float in the air waiting for someone to grab them. "There are many things in the culture reflective of things that Slam Frank is doing," he says, "so it's clearly something in the air." He's received emails accusing him of making people stop taking the Holocaust seriously. His response: people were already moving in that direction. "I've been talking to people for the last three years; they were ready to not take it seriously anymore." Whether that readiness reflects genuine cultural change or something more troubling remains the question the show leaves hanging.

A lot of the work that's been made commercially in the last decade has been very direct about what you're supposed to take away from it, and we wanted to write something that was a reaction to that.
— Joel Sinensky, writer
We are teasing, but not actually making fun of the identity. What the show plays with is the idea of your identity equaling your ethics, because that's just not true.
— Olivia Bernábe, actor playing Anita
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en The Guardian ↗
Contáctanos FAQ