A decade-long study of over 123,000 British adults has quietly dismantled one of modern nutrition's most comfortable assumptions: that choosing a diet drink is choosing wisely. Presented in Berlin, the research found that just one sweetened beverage per day — whether sugared or artificially so — raises the risk of a now-epidemic liver condition by 50 to 60 percent. As metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease quietly claims 38 percent of the global population, the study places a familiar, everyday choice within a much larger story of how small habits accumulate into collective c
Single daily sugary or diet drink linked to 50-60% higher liver disease risk
Both are widely consumed, yet their effects on liver health remain poorly understood.
So the study found that diet drinks are actually worse than sugary drinks for the liver? That seems counterintuitive.
Not worse exactly—equally bad, or nearly so. Diet drinks raised risk by 60 percent, sugary drinks by 50 percent. The point is they're not the safer alternative people assume them to be.
But we should be careful here. This is observational data from a single study. The researchers tracked what people drank and who got sick, but they didn't randomly assign people to drink diets versus sugar drinks. People who drink diet drinks might differ in other ways.
True, but the study did follow 123,000 people over a decade, which is substantial. And the mechanism they propose for diet drinks—altering the gut microbiome, disrupting fullness signals—is plausible based on other research.
What about the people who died? That's the part that feels most concrete.
Over ten years, 108 participants died from liver-related causes out of 123,788. That's a small absolute number, but it's real. And 1,178 developed the disease itself.
Right, and we don't know from this study alone whether the diet drinks directly caused those deaths or whether people who drank diet drinks had other risk factors. The study controlled for some things but not everything.
So what should someone actually do with this information?
The researchers are pretty clear: drink water instead. Maintain a healthy weight, exercise, eat balanced meals. Those are the levers people can actually pull.
And that's solid advice regardless. You don't need to wait for perfect certainty about diet drinks to know that water is better than any sweetened beverage.
Does this change how we should think about diet drinks in public health?
It should at least complicate the narrative that they're a harm-reduction tool. If they carry similar risks to sugary drinks, then they're not solving the problem—just shifting it.
Though we'd want to see this replicated in other populations before making major policy shifts. This is UK data. Does it hold in other countries with different diets and genetics? That's still an open question.
O Pulso
- A condition once considered a niche liver disorder now affects more than a third of humanity, having grown 50 percent in just two decades — and daily drink habits are a significant driver.
- The study's most unsettling finding is not about sugar, but about trust: diet drinks, long marketed as the responsible alternative, carry an equal or greater liver risk than their sugary counterparts.
- Over ten years, 1,178 study participants developed MASLD and 108 died from liver-related causes — numbers that transform a statistical risk into a measurable human toll.
- The biological pathways differ — sugar spikes insulin and promotes fat accumulation, while artificial sweeteners disrupt gut bacteria and intensify cravings — but both roads lead to the same liver damage.
- Researchers are pointing toward a deceptively simple intervention: replacing sweetened drinks with water, paired with regular exercise and a balanced diet, to meaningfully reduce risk at the individual and population level.
A decade-long study of over 123,000 British adults has quietly dismantled one of modern nutrition's most comfortable assumptions: that choosing a diet drink is choosing wisely. Presented in Berlin, the research found that just one sweetened beverage per day — whether sugared or artificially so — raises the risk of a now-epidemic liver condition by 50 to 60 percent. As metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease quietly claims 38 percent of the global population, the study places a familiar, everyday choice within a much larger story of how small habits accumulate into collective consequence.
A ten-year study tracking more than 123,000 British adults has challenged one of the most persistent assumptions in everyday health: that diet drinks are a safer alternative to sugary ones. Presented at the United European Gastroenterology Week in Berlin, the research found that a single artificially sweetened drink per day raised the risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease — MASLD — by 60 percent. Sugar-sweetened drinks were close behind, increasing risk by 50 percent.
All participants were free of liver disease at the study's outset. Researchers tracked their consumption through repeated 24-hour dietary questionnaires, capturing real intake patterns over time. By the decade's end, 1,178 people had developed MASLD and 108 had died from liver-related causes — figures that give weight to what might otherwise feel like an abstract warning.
MASLD, formerly known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, occurs when fat builds up in liver tissue, potentially causing inflammation, fatigue, and pain. Its reach has grown dramatically: a 2025 analysis estimated that 38 percent of the global population now lives with the condition, a 50 percent rise over twenty years. The disease is also increasingly linked to cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and kidney problems.
Lead author Lihe Liu noted that while sugary drinks have long faced scrutiny, their diet counterparts have largely escaped it — a perception this research directly contests. The mechanisms differ: sugary drinks spike blood glucose and promote fat accumulation, while artificial sweeteners disrupt the gut microbiome, blunt feelings of fullness, and may trigger insulin responses despite containing no sugar. Different pathways, the same destination.
The research team's recommendation is straightforward: replace both drink types with water, maintain a healthy weight, and exercise regularly. Whether that guidance will translate into meaningful change — for individuals or for public health systems — remains the harder, still-unanswered question.
A decade-long study of more than 123,000 British adults has upended a common assumption about diet drinks: that they are a safer choice than their sugary counterparts. The research, presented at the United European Gastroenterology Week in Berlin, found that consuming just one can of an artificially sweetened beverage per day raised the risk of developing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) by 60 percent. Sugar-sweetened drinks carried a similar burden, increasing risk by 50 percent.
The study tracked 123,788 UK participants over ten years, all of whom had no liver disease when the research began. Researchers documented their drink consumption through repeated 24-hour dietary questionnaires, a method designed to capture actual intake patterns rather than relying on memory or estimation. During the decade, 1,178 participants developed MASLD, and 108 died from liver-related causes. These numbers ground an otherwise abstract health warning in concrete human consequence.
MASDL, formerly called non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, occurs when fat accumulates in the liver tissue, potentially triggering inflammation, pain, fatigue, and loss of appetite. The condition has become a significant public health concern. A 2025 analysis of 92 studies estimated that 38 percent of the world's population now has MASLD—a 50 percent increase over the past two decades. The disease is increasingly recognized as a contributor to cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and kidney problems, meaning its effects ripple far beyond the liver itself.
Lihe Liu, the study's lead author, emphasized that the findings challenge a widespread belief. "SSBs have long been under scrutiny, while their 'diet' alternatives are often seen as the healthier choice," he said. "Both, however, are widely consumed and their effects on liver health have not been well understood." The research suggests that diet drinks may pose an equal or greater threat than their sugary equivalents, even at modest consumption levels.
The biological mechanisms differ between the two drink types. Sugar-sweetened beverages cause rapid spikes in blood glucose and insulin, promote weight gain, and increase uric acid levels—all pathways that lead to fat accumulation in the liver. Artificially sweetened drinks operate through a different route: they alter the gut microbiome, disrupt the body's sense of fullness, intensify cravings for sweet foods, and may trigger insulin secretion despite containing no sugar themselves. Both roads lead to the same destination.
The research team pointed toward practical interventions. Water emerged as the clear winner, removing what Liu called "the metabolic burden" while providing hydration without triggering the biological cascades that lead to liver fat accumulation. Beyond beverage choice, the researchers recommended maintaining a healthy weight, exercising regularly, and eating a balanced diet as strategies to significantly reduce liver disease risk.
The findings arrive at a moment when MASLD is emerging as a global health crisis, affecting more than a third of the world's population. The study suggests that one of the simplest interventions—replacing both sugary and diet drinks with water—could meaningfully alter that trajectory. Whether consumers and public health systems will act on that knowledge remains an open question.
Citações Notáveis
Our study shows that artificially sweetened drinks were actually linked to a higher risk of MASLD, even at modest intake levels such as a single can per day.— Lihe Liu, lead researcher
Water remains the best choice as it removes the metabolic burden and prevents fat accumulation in the liver, whilst hydrating the body.— Lihe Liu