In the shallow coastal waters off Palm Beach County, Florida, a quiet experiment with an underwater speaker has redrawn the boundaries of what we understand about ancient predators and their relationship to sound. Researchers from Florida Atlantic University have demonstrated, for the first time in freely swimming wild sharks, that blacktip sharks can not only detect low-frequency sounds from nearly 250 feet away, but can pinpoint their direction — a sensory sophistication long obscured by the acoustic distortions of laboratory walls. In the larger story of life in the sea, this finding remind
Sharks detect low-frequency sounds from 250 feet away, study finds
Sharks detect and locate sound from hundreds of feet away
So they found that sharks can hear from 250 feet away. That's the headline. But what does that actually mean for how a shark hunts?
It means a shark gets acoustic information about its environment long before it sees anything. A struggling fish or an injured animal creates vibrations in the water. If a shark can detect those from hundreds of feet away, it's gathering intelligence about potential prey or threats from a distance we didn't know was possible.
But wait—the study used an underwater speaker playing artificial sounds. We don't know if sharks actually use this ability to hunt in the wild, or if they're just reacting to a loud noise. The startle response they measured might not translate to predatory behavior.
That's fair. The study shows the capability exists. It doesn't prove how sharks deploy it in nature. But the fact that they orient away from the sound—they're not just hearing it, they're locating it—suggests the sensory system is sophisticated enough to be useful.
Why is it surprising that sharks can hear from that far away? Weren't people already studying shark hearing?
Yes, but mostly in laboratory tanks. And in tanks, sound bounces off the walls and creates distorted acoustic patterns. This is the first time researchers measured free-swimming sharks responding to sounds in open water, where the acoustic environment is natural.
So the lab studies might have underestimated shark hearing all along because the tanks were giving them bad data?
Exactly. The tank environment was essentially corrupting the signal. You can't measure what a shark can actually hear if the sound is bouncing around like a house of mirrors.
The sharks didn't respond to the 10 kiloHertz sound. Why that frequency?
It's outside the known hearing range of sharks. It was a control—a way to confirm that the sharks were responding to the low-frequency sounds specifically, not just to any loud noise.
But "known hearing range" is based on what? Mostly tank studies, right? So we're using potentially flawed data to design a control for a study meant to correct flawed data.
True. But the control worked—no response to 10 kiloHertz, clear responses to the lower frequencies. That consistency strengthens the findings.
What happens next? Do they try to understand how sharks actually use this in hunting?
That's the stated goal. They want to know how the shark sensory system detects and processes these distant acoustic signals. Understanding that could reveal a lot about predator behavior in the ocean.
O Pulso
- Wild blacktip sharks detected low-frequency sounds from up to 243 feet away and made sharp, deliberate turns away from the source — proving they locate sound, not merely sense it.
- Previous laboratory studies had unknowingly corrupted their own results: tank walls bounce sound like a house of mirrors, masking the true range and precision of shark hearing.
- Researchers deployed drones, calibrated hydrophones, and an untethered underwater speaker in open coastal waters to strip away those distortions and observe genuine, undisturbed shark behavior.
- More than 70 percent of recorded responses occurred in the acoustic far field, where sound behaves differently than near its source — territory no prior free-swimming shark study had clearly mapped.
- The findings point toward a next frontier: understanding exactly how sharks, without the gas-filled swim bladders of bony fish, use their inner ears to process particle motion across hundreds of feet of open water.
In the shallow coastal waters off Palm Beach County, Florida, a quiet experiment with an underwater speaker has redrawn the boundaries of what we understand about ancient predators and their relationship to sound. Researchers from Florida Atlantic University have demonstrated, for the first time in freely swimming wild sharks, that blacktip sharks can not only detect low-frequency sounds from nearly 250 feet away, but can pinpoint their direction — a sensory sophistication long obscured by the acoustic distortions of laboratory walls. In the larger story of life in the sea, this finding reminds us that the ocean is first and foremost a world of sound, and that its oldest hunters have been listening far more carefully than we knew.
Off the Palm Beach County coast, Florida Atlantic University researchers placed an underwater speaker in shallow water and waited. What followed was the clearest demonstration yet of a sensory capability never before confirmed in wild, freely swimming sharks: the ability to hear low-frequency sounds from nearly 250 feet away — and to know exactly where those sounds are coming from.
The team chose blacktip sharks deliberately. These animals gather in large numbers along Southeast Florida's coast each winter, in shallow, clear water ideal for drone observation. By anchoring a boat and allowing the speaker to drift up to 19 meters away on the current, researchers minimized the vessel's influence on the animals. They broadcast three ranges of low-frequency sound — 100 to 800 Hertz — alongside a 10 kiloHertz control tone known to fall outside shark hearing. A drone flying 40 to 50 meters overhead recorded every movement, and calibrated hydrophones measured exactly what acoustic pressure each shark experienced at the moment it reacted.
The results were unambiguous. Sharks responded to low-frequency sounds from distances up to 74 meters, ignored the control tone entirely, and in more than 70 percent of cases made sharp directional turns away from the speaker — demonstrating not passive detection but active sound localization. They proved most sensitive to the lowest frequencies, detecting them from the greatest distances and at the lowest sound levels.
Lead author Caroline Sullivan pointed to a critical methodological insight: laboratory tanks distort acoustic measurements because sound reflects endlessly off walls, creating what she called a house of mirrors. Open-ocean research eliminated that noise, revealing capabilities that controlled indoor studies had consistently underestimated.
Sharks lack the gas-filled swim bladders that help many bony fish detect sound pressure. They rely instead on their inner ears, including a structure called the macula neglecta, thought to sense the particle motion that sound creates as it moves through water. That sharks can do this from hundreds of feet away — in the acoustic far field, where sound behaves differently than near its source — suggests their sensory systems are far more refined than previously understood. The next phase of research will examine precisely how that detection works, with implications for how scientists understand predator behavior and the acoustic ecology of the sea.
Off the coast of Palm Beach County, Florida, researchers from Florida Atlantic University placed an underwater speaker in shallow water and waited to see what the sharks would do. What they discovered was a sensory capability that had never been clearly demonstrated in wild, freely swimming sharks: the ability to hear and locate low-frequency sounds from nearly 250 feet away.
The study, published in Integrative Organismal Biology, focused on blacktip sharks, animals that gather predictably in Southeast Florida's coastal waters. The researchers chose this location and species deliberately. Blacktip sharks congregate along the Palm Beach County coast in large numbers each winter, with smaller populations present year-round. The shallow, clear water allowed scientists to observe individual animals from above using a drone while keeping the sharks undisturbed in their natural habitat. Stephen Kajiura, a professor of biological sciences at FAU and senior author of the work, noted that the sharks' abundance and accessibility made it possible to conduct controlled acoustic tests without disrupting their normal behavior.
The experimental setup was designed to isolate the sharks' hearing from other variables. Researchers anchored a boat, then positioned an underwater speaker and allowed it to drift with the current as far as 19 meters away from the vessel, reducing the chance that the boat itself would influence the animals' responses. They played three groups of low-frequency sounds—100 to 200 Hertz, 200 to 400 Hertz, and 400 to 800 Hertz—at volumes loud enough to provoke a startle response. They also used a 10 kiloHertz control sound, which falls outside the known hearing range of sharks. Rather than trying to attract the animals toward the speaker, the researchers wanted to see if the sharks would react by turning away.
Calibrated hydrophones measured sound levels at different distances, allowing researchers to determine exactly what acoustic pressure each shark experienced at the moment it reacted. A drone flying 40 to 50 meters above the water recorded the movements of free-swimming sharks during both the experimental and control sounds. Scientists then analyzed the footage frame by frame, measuring how far each shark was from the speaker and how sharply its swimming direction changed in response.
The results were striking. Sharks detected low-frequency sounds from distances of up to 74 meters—243 feet—substantially farther than had previously been demonstrated in freely swimming animals. They showed no response to the 10 kiloHertz control sound, confirming that their reactions were genuine acoustic responses. More than 70 percent of the recorded responses occurred in what researchers call the acoustic far field, the region where sound behaves differently than it does near the source. Critically, the sharks did not simply detect the presence of sound. They made rapid, sharp turns away from the speaker, indicating they could determine the direction from which the sound was coming.
The sharks proved most sensitive to lower frequencies, detecting them from greater distances and at lower sound levels. This finding carries particular significance because sharks lack the gas-filled swim bladder found in many bony fish—an organ that can assist in sound pressure detection. Instead, sharks rely largely on their inner ears, which include a specialized sensory structure called the macula neglecta, believed to help them detect motion and vibrations as sound travels through water. The fact that sharks can detect particle motion from hundreds of feet away, something not previously demonstrated in free-swimming animals, suggests their sensory systems are far more sophisticated than laboratory studies had indicated.
Caroline Sullivan, the lead author who conducted this work as part of her master's degree, emphasized why ocean-based research proved essential. In laboratory tanks, sound bounces repeatedly off the walls, creating complex and confusing acoustic patterns that distort what researchers can actually measure. "It is like being in a house of mirrors," Sullivan explained. The open ocean provided the clarity needed to observe genuine shark responses.
The implications extend beyond academic curiosity. The ocean is fundamentally an acoustic environment, and these findings suggest that sound provides sharks with useful information about events occurring hundreds of feet away, long before prey or other objects enter visual range. Kajiura noted that being able to detect and respond to sounds from such distances gives these predators an important source of information about their surroundings. The next phase of research will focus on understanding precisely how the shark sensory system detects and processes these distant acoustic signals—a question that could reshape how scientists understand predator behavior and marine ecology.
Citações Notáveis
Their abundance and accessibility made it possible for us to observe them from above without disturbing their natural behavior, while also presenting controlled underwater sounds.— Stephen Kajiura, senior author and professor of biological sciences at Florida Atlantic University
Trying to do hearing experiments in a tank results in the sound bouncing off the walls which causes complex and confusing signals—it is like being in a house of mirrors.— Caroline Sullivan, lead author