After more than a decade of consolidated power, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić has resigned, driven from office not by a single political failure but by the accumulated weight of public disillusionment — crystallized in the 2024 collapse of a railway station roof that killed 16 people and exposed the hollow promise of his modernization narrative. The protests that followed, led first by students and then by a broad cross-section of Serbian society, represent one of the more sustained civic uprisings in recent European history. Yet Vučić's departure from the presidency does not mark his exi
Serbian President Vučić Resigns Amid Corruption Protests, Seeks PM Role
16 people killed in the 2024 Novi Sad railway station roof collapse that triggered the protests.
The station became a symbol of corner-cutting and negligence
Mark
So Vučić actually resigned? I thought he was trying to stay in power.
Mimi
He did resign as president, but he's running for prime minister in the snap elections. It's a constitutional workaround—he can't have a third presidential term, so he's shifting offices.
Luke
Right, but let's be clear: this isn't him leaving power. He's repositioning. The question is whether voters will accept that move.
Mark
What triggered the resignation? Was it just the protests?
Mimi
The protests were sustained and broad—students, teachers, workers, farmers. But they started with something specific: the Novi Sad railway station roof collapsed in 2024 and killed 16 people. That was the crack in the dam.
Luke
And the station was a Vučić project, a symbol of his government's modernization agenda. So the collapse wasn't just a tragedy; it felt like proof of the corruption and negligence people were already angry about.
Mark
Did the government try to respond before resigning?
Mimi
They did. Officials resigned, but the protests didn't stop. By summer, there were accusations of police brutality during demonstrations, which only deepened the anger.
Luke
So the standard playbook—sacrifice some officials, wait for the anger to fade—didn't work. The movement had momentum and clear demands.
Mark
What happens now?
Mimi
Two elections before the end of the year. Parliamentary elections in late October, then presidential elections after that. Vučić's party faces real opposition for the first time—a student-led anti-corruption movement and a pro-Western coalition.
Luke
The key unknown is whether the student movement and the opposition can actually coordinate or whether they split the anti-Vučić vote. That could determine whether he retains power as prime minister.
Mark
Has Vučić been in power this whole time?
Mimi
He's been a fixture for over a decade. Prime minister starting in 2014, then president from 2017 until now. Nine years as president.
Luke
So this is a significant moment—the first real challenge to his political dominance in years. Whether it sticks depends on what voters do in October and November.
The Pulse
- A roof falls in Novi Sad, killing 16 people, and what collapses with it is the credibility of a government that had held that renovated station up as proof of its own competence.
- Students flood the streets, then teachers, farmers, and workers join them — a protest movement that refuses to dissolve despite official resignations offered as pacifiers.
- Accusations of police brutality harden the demonstrations into something beyond accountability demands, becoming a referendum on Vučić's entire decade in power.
- Constitutionally barred from a third presidential term, Vučić announces his resignation but immediately repositions — running for prime minister, keeping his hand on the wheel from a different seat.
- Serbia now faces two elections before year's end, with a student-led anti-corruption movement and a pro-Western opposition coalition mounting the most credible challenge to Vučić's party in over a decade.
After more than a decade of consolidated power, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić has resigned, driven from office not by a single political failure but by the accumulated weight of public disillusionment — crystallized in the 2024 collapse of a railway station roof that killed 16 people and exposed the hollow promise of his modernization narrative. The protests that followed, led first by students and then by a broad cross-section of Serbian society, represent one of the more sustained civic uprisings in recent European history. Yet Vučić's departure from the presidency does not mark his exit from power — it marks his reinvention, as he pivots toward parliamentary leadership while Serbia prepares for two elections before year's end.
Aleksandar Vučić announced his resignation as Serbia's president outside the presidential building in Belgrade, closing nine years in office with words about peace and stability that rang hollow against more than a year of street protests. The moment that broke the dam came in 2024, when the roof of Novi Sad's railway station — renovated under his government and presented as a symbol of national progress — collapsed and killed 16 people. The disaster reframed his entire tenure: what had been sold as modernization now looked like a decade of corner-cutting and corruption dressed in concrete and ribbon-cuttings.
Students were the first to march, but the movement grew to include teachers, workers, and farmers. When the government offered the familiar remedy of official resignations, the protests only deepened. Accusations of police brutality added fresh grievance, and by summer the demonstrations had transformed from calls for accountability into demands for elections themselves.
Vučić had telegraphed his intention to step down as early as June, but the timing of the formal announcement made clear the protests had forced his hand. His resignation triggers a constitutional clock: presidential elections must be held within three months, meaning Serbia will vote twice before the year is out — parliamentary elections in late October, presidential elections to follow. Before leaving office, he pardoned 49 people, including students and party members caught up in what he called the turbulence of the past year and a half.
He is not, however, leaving politics. Vučić will stand as the Progressive Party's candidate for prime minister, positioning himself to hold the country's top executive role through a different door. His party will face two organized challengers for the first time in years: Students Win, the anti-corruption movement born from the protests, and European Serbia, a pro-Western opposition coalition. The geopolitical balancing act that once defined his appeal — EU membership rhetoric alongside warm ties with Moscow and Beijing — now reads to many voters as the very cynicism that brought them into the streets.
Aleksandar Vučić stood outside the presidential building in Belgrade and announced his resignation, ending nine years as Serbia's president. He spoke of his administration's role in preserving peace and stability, but the words came against a backdrop of sustained public anger that had worn down his government for more than a year.
The rupture began in 2024 when the roof of Novi Sad's railway station collapsed, killing 16 people. The station had been renovated under Vučić's watch, presented as a symbol of Serbia's modernization and progress. Instead, it became a symbol of something else: a decade of corner-cutting, alleged corruption, and governance that prioritized appearance over substance. The disaster cracked open a broader public reckoning. Students took to the streets first, then teachers, workers, and farmers joined them. The protests swelled through 2024 and into 2025, morphing from demands for accountability into calls for elections themselves.
Vučić's government tried the familiar move: resignations. Officials stepped down. Nothing stopped the demonstrations. By summer, the anger had hardened into something more volatile. Accusations of police brutality during the protests added another layer of grievance. The president found himself presiding over a country that had lost faith in his administration's basic competence and honesty.
Under Serbia's constitution, Vučić could not seek a third presidential term. He had signaled his intention to resign back in June, but the timing of the actual announcement—after months of escalating pressure—made clear that the protests had forced his hand. His resignation triggers a constitutional requirement: presidential elections must occur within three months. This means Serbia will hold two elections before the year ends. Parliamentary elections are scheduled for late October, with presidential voting to follow more than a month later.
But Vučić is not leaving power. He will run as the Progressive Party's candidate for prime minister in the parliamentary elections, positioning himself to retain the country's top political role despite the constitutional bar on a third presidency. Parliamentary speaker Ana Brnabić, also from the Progressive Party, will serve as interim president until a new one is elected. Before stepping down, Vučić used his presidential powers to pardon 49 people, including 23 students and party members accused of offenses tied to what he described as the "terrible events" of the past year and a half.
The elections will pit Vučić's Progressive Party against two challengers: a student-led anti-corruption movement called Students Win, and a coalition of pro-Western opposition parties known as European Serbia. For the first time in more than a decade, Vučić faces organized political opposition with real momentum behind it. He has long positioned himself as a bridge figure—publicly committed to Serbia's EU membership while cultivating close ties to Russia and welcoming Chinese investment. That balancing act, once a source of his political strength, now looks like the kind of calculation that fueled the anger in the first place. Voters will decide in the coming weeks whether they want a different direction.
Notable Quotes
Vučić described the past year and a half as 'terrible events' when justifying his use of presidential pardons for 49 people, including students and party members— Aleksandar Vučić, via Serbian public broadcaster RTS
Want the full story?
Read the original at BBC News ↗