Serbia Wakes to a New Reality as Student Movement Ousts Vučić at the Ballot Box

Observers reported incidents of physical violence during the election day process.
24 hours ago that all seemed like a fantasy to us
Analyst Nikola Burazer on how unlikely the student victory seemed just a day before the result.
Mark

Start with the numbers. How decisive is this?

Mimi

On the projection, very. 140 seats against 103 for Vučić's bloc, with 126 needed. Nobody else cleared 3%, and minority parties hold seven.

Luke

Keep in mind that's a CeSID projection, not final results. More than 97% of stations are counted, and a few could even be rerun, though the overall outcome isn't expected to change.

Mark

Observers called it positive. Is that a clean bill of health?

Mimi

Not really. Polling day itself went well in the vast majority of stations, but they described grave misuse of public resources, intimidation and biased state media.

Luke

And they reported incidents of physical violence. The reporting doesn't say how many or how serious, so I wouldn't put a figure on it.

Mark

What about the students' lack of experience?

Mimi

Most of the 250 candidates were academics and artists. Their vetting took months through plenums and ended a day before filing.

Luke

That process won't survive government deadlines, which is the analysts' point. How they speed it up is unknown.

Mark

Is Šoškić the prime minister, then?

Luke

No. He's described as widely seen as the frontrunner. That's speculation, and the movement is leaderless by design.

Mimi

What is fixed is the calendar: the Assembly within 30 days, government within 90, president by 27 December.

  • The Student List is projected at 140 seats, comfortably past the 126 needed, ending years of Vučić's grip on parliament.
  • Observers praised the high turnout and polling-day conduct, yet warned of misused state resources, intimidation, and a media landscape tilted toward the ruling side.
  • A movement with no single leader must now choose a prime minister quickly, with former central bank governor Dejan Šoškić widely seen as the frontrunner.
  • Constitutional clocks are running: parliament must convene within 30 days, a government must form within 90 after that, and a presidential vote is required by 27 December.
  • Reports of physical violence on election day hang over the outcome, and a few contested polling stations could delay final results by a week or two.

On a Monday morning in late October, Serbia awoke to a political landscape that had shifted in a single night. A movement born of students and street assemblies had overturned the long dominance of Aleksandar Vučić, whose bloc now finds itself on the losing side of a vote it was expected to win. The result opens a narrow window in which a country that has lived for years under a single commanding figure must decide how to govern itself, and whether the hopes of its citizens and of its European neighbours for a reset can take lasting shape. What follows will depend less on the arithmetic of seats than on whether the trust that carried the movement can survive the slower work of building institutions.

Serbia woke on Monday, 26 October 2026, to a parliament that almost no one had expected a day earlier. A grassroots movement led by students had beaten the bloc of Aleksandar Vučić, the authoritarian leader who had dominated the country for years. The latest projection gave the Student List 140 seats, well above the 126 needed for a majority, while Vučić's bloc was projected at 103. Most of the counting is complete, and although a few localised problems could force revotes or delay official results, they are not expected to change the outcome.

International observers from the OSCE's ODIHR and the European Parliament judged the day itself broadly positive, citing high turnout and real competition. Their statement was far less comfortable about everything surrounding the vote. They described a deeply polarised atmosphere, an uneven playing field, misuse of public resources, and pressure on voters and civil society. State media showed clear imbalances, online campaigning remained essentially unregulated, and reports of physical violence raised serious concerns. Several EU leaders welcomed the result and hoped for renewed engagement, while Russia, whose favoured candidate had been Vučić, said it hoped to work with the new authorities.

The movement now faces its hardest test: choosing who will govern. The Student List has no single leader, and most of its candidates are academics and artists with little political experience. Their list was shaped through consultations with student plenums across the country, finishing only a day before submission. Analysts expect that the constitutional deadlines will force faster decisions than the movement is used to making. Dejan Šoškić, a former central bank governor who resigned in protest at political interference, is widely seen as the likely prime minister.

The calendar is fixed. Parliament must meet within 30 days of final results, and a government must form within 90 days after that. A presidential election must be held by 27 December, since Vučić stepped down to run for parliament. Until then, his close ally Ana Brnabić remains acting president, and a new parliamentary speaker from the Student List would take over that role. Whether the movement can turn its victory into functioning institutions will shape Serbia's direction long after the arithmetic of this election is forgotten.

Serbia woke on Monday, 26 October 2026, to a parliament-to-be that almost no one had expected a day earlier. A grassroots opposition movement led by students had beaten the bloc of Aleksandar Vučić, the authoritarian leader who had dominated the country, in the early parliamentary election held on Sunday. The Guardian's Jakub Krupa described the result as raising hopes for a reset in relations with the EU and other partners.

The latest projection from the polling group CeSID gave the Student List 140 seats, comfortably above the 126 needed for a majority. Vučić's bloc was projected at 103. No other party cleared the 3% threshold, and national minority parties took the remaining seven seats. More than 97% of polling stations had been counted, but some localised problems could, in extreme cases, force a revote at individual stations. None of that would change the overall outcome, though it could delay official results by a week or two.

International observers, including the OSCE's ODIHR and the European Parliament, called the election broadly positive on the day itself, but their preliminary statement was blunt about the conditions around it. It described high turnout and vigorous competition between two main contenders, yet an atmosphere of profound polarisation and seriously compromised equality of campaign opportunity. They cited entrenched advantages for the ruling party, grave misuse of public resources, and intimidation and pressure on voters, candidates and civil society. Special coordinator Gilles Baum, a Luxembourgish MP, said widespread distrust in voter registration persisted despite earlier recommendations. He also said reported incidents of physical violence raised serious concerns, and that some procedural shortcomings were noted. Polling-day procedures were assessed positively in the vast majority of stations observed; Italian MP Pierro Fassino said the process passed muster in 96% of those visited.

Eoghan Murphy, who heads the ODIHR mission, went further on media. State media showed pronounced imbalances in exposure and treatment of contestants, he said, contrary to legal obligations and its public service mandate, and most monitored broadcasters failed to give voters impartial information. Online campaigning, he said, remains largely unregulated, with no dedicated oversight mechanism. Arrangements for voting abroad also drew criticism for lacking clear criteria on polling stations, locations and hours; Austrian MEP Andreas Schieder said this needs to change. Serbia's largest domestic observer group, CRTA, urged the incoming government to make re-establishing the integrity of elections a top priority.

Reactions arrived quickly. Several EU leaders congratulated the student movement and voiced hope for renewed engagement with Serbia. Russia, whose preferred candidate was Vučić, said it hoped for cooperation with the new authorities.

The next question is who will lead. The Student List has no single leader, and most of its 250 candidates were experts from academia and the arts with little political experience. Every candidate was vetted through extensive consultations with student plenums across the country, a process that finished literally one day before the list was submitted, according to Nikola Burazer of the Centre for Contemporary Politics. He said it will not be decided by a small group in a room, but will have to be faster. Colleague Aleksandar Ivković said constitutional deadlines will force quicker choices. Former central bank governor Dejan Šoškić, who resigned in 2012 two years into the job in protest at alleged interference with his independence, is widely seen as the frontrunner for prime minister.

The timeline is fixed. Once final results are published, the National Assembly must meet within 30 days, by early to mid-December at the latest, starting a 90-day clock to form a government. Because the students hold a majority, many experts expect a government by December. A presidential election is also required by 27 December, after Vučić resigned the presidency to run for parliament. Until then Ana Brnabić, a close Vučić ally, serves as acting president as the last parliamentary speaker, and a new speaker, presumably from the Student List, would take over that role.

After people are done celebrating, we will focus on what's coming up. 24 hours ago that all seemed like a fantasy to us.
— Nikola Burazer, Centre for Contemporary Politics
Online campaigning remains largely unregulated, with no dedicated oversight mechanism.
— Eoghan Murphy, head of the ODIHR mission
Contattaci Domande frequenti