Scientists hunt for undiscovered species in NYC parks using DNA barcoding

Unknown species can be discovered in parks and gardens too
Hartop argues that new discoveries are not confined to remote wilderness but exist in urban spaces we pass through daily.
Mark

So they're just putting traps in Central Park and waiting to find new species? That seems almost too simple.

Mimi

It is simple in concept, but the real work happens after collection. The DNA barcoding is what makes it feasible—you can process hundreds of insects and compare them against a global database in weeks, not years.

Luke

How reliable is that database, though? If a species has never been sequenced before, the barcode won't match anything, but that doesn't automatically mean it's new. It could just mean it's rare or that the reference library has gaps.

Mimi

That's exactly why step three matters—the experts have to look at the actual specimen and confirm it. Hartop and others in her field do that work.

Mark

And how long does that confirmation take?

Mimi

Years, typically. The formal description and naming process is slow and rigorous.

Luke

So they might find candidates this year, but we won't know about actual new species for a while.

Mimi

Right. But the point Hartop is making is broader—that we've been looking in the wrong places, or at least assuming new discoveries only happen in remote areas.

Mark

Is there evidence that urban parks actually have more undiscovered species than, say, a forest upstate?

Luke

The source doesn't say that. Hartop says it's likely they'd find new species in any city if they looked systematically. That's different from saying cities are biodiversity hotspots.

Mimi

Fair. But the psychological shift matters. If people realize that the unknown is everywhere, not just in rainforests, maybe we start paying attention to what's in front of us.

Mark

Including in our own gardens.

Mimi

Exactly.

  • A vast biological blind spot looms over everyday life: of an estimated 20 million animal species on Earth, only 2 million have been named, and the unnamed majority includes common insects living in city parks.
  • The assumption that new species discoveries require expeditions to rainforests or ocean trenches is being directly challenged by researchers setting traps in some of the most visited urban green spaces in the world.
  • Malaise traps funnel insects into ethanol in Central Park and Prospect Park each month, sending specimens to Canada where DNA barcoding flags anything that doesn't match the known scientific record.
  • When a potential new species surfaces, it enters a slow, painstaking confirmation process — specialist examination followed by a formal description that can take years — underscoring how understaffed and underfunded this corner of science remains.
  • If urban parks in New York harbor undescribed species, the implication ripples outward: unknown biodiversity may exist in gardens, backyards, and cities everywhere, quietly sustaining ecosystems we don't yet fully understand.

In the green corridors of Central Park and Prospect Park, scientists are quietly dismantling one of biology's most persistent assumptions: that undiscovered life belongs only to remote wilderness. Entomologist Emily Hartop and a multinational team are deploying DNA barcoding to search New York City's most visited parks for insect species unknown to science, drawing on the sobering reality that roughly 90% of Earth's estimated animal species have never been formally named. The work is less a search for the exotic than a reckoning with how little we know about the living world immediately around us — and what it means to lose species before we ever learn they exist.

Emily Hartop, an entomologist at Norway's NTNU University Museum, believes New York City's most famous parks are sheltering animals science has never formally described. She's not searching for anything large or dramatic — her quarry is insects, the kind most people walk past without a second glance, yet which may be entirely absent from the scientific record.

Her confidence is grounded in a striking imbalance. Scientists have catalogued around two million species, but the true number of animals on Earth is thought to be closer to twenty million. That gap isn't populated by hidden giants in distant jungles. It's filled with small, overlooked organisms — insects, mites, and others that researchers have come to call 'dark taxa': species-rich, ecologically essential, and almost entirely ignored.

The search in New York follows a four-stage process. Malaise traps installed in Central Park and Prospect Park funnel insects into ethanol for preservation. Monthly, specimens travel to Canada's Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, where DNA barcoding checks each one against a library of known species. An unmatched result signals a possible discovery, which then moves to specialist examination — Hartop herself focuses on humpbacked flies, a family so diverse that new species within it turn up regularly. Confirmed discoveries enter a formal naming process that typically unfolds over years.

What distinguishes this project is its setting. Hartop argues that the same systematic approach applied to any urban area would yield similar results, suggesting that the living world around us is far more populated and strange than we tend to assume. The stakes are not merely taxonomic. Unnamed insects maintain ecological balances we rely on, and we have no way of knowing what we lose when species disappear before we ever learn they existed. The hunt in New York's parks is, at its core, an attempt to map reality as it actually is.

Emily Hartop, an entomologist at Norway's NTNU University Museum, is convinced that New York City's most famous parks are hiding animals that science has never formally described. She's not looking for anything large or obvious. Instead, she and a team spanning Vox, the Centre for Biodiversity Genomics in Canada, and the stewards of Central Park and Prospect Park are hunting for insects—the kind most people never notice, the kind that might be common enough to encounter in a backyard but remain entirely unknown to the scientific record.

The premise sounds unlikely, but Hartop's confidence rests on a stark fact: the vast majority of Earth's animals remain unnamed. Scientists have formally catalogued roughly two million species. The actual number is thought to be ten times higher. That gap isn't filled with exotic creatures in distant places. It's filled with small things—insects, mites, and other organisms so overlooked that they've earned a name in the scientific literature: "dark taxa." These groups are species-rich and ecologically vital, yet they receive a fraction of the attention lavished on mammals, birds, or bees. The specialists who study them are few, and the work of simply knowing what exists has barely begun.

The hunt in New York follows a methodical four-step process. First, two tent-like traps called Malaise traps have been installed in Central Park and Prospect Park. These devices funnel insects into containers of ethanol, preserving them for analysis. Once a month, the collected specimens travel to Canada, where researchers use DNA barcoding to identify them. The technique works like a genetic fingerprint: a short, standardized segment of an organism's DNA serves as a unique identifier, comparable to a barcode on a store item. Each specimen is checked against a reference library of known species. If no match appears, the insect may be something new.

When a potential discovery emerges, it moves to the third stage: expert examination. Hartop herself specializes in humpbacked flies, a family so diverse that new species within it are regularly found. These specialists conduct detailed investigations to confirm whether they're looking at something genuinely undescribed. If the answer is yes, the fourth step begins—a formal scientific description and naming process that typically takes years to complete.

What makes this project notable is not the method but the location. The assumption that new species discoveries happen only in remote rainforests or deep ocean trenches has shaped how we think about biodiversity. Hartop challenges that directly. "Unknown species can be discovered in parks and gardens too," she says. She believes the same systematic approach applied to Trondheim, her home city, or almost any urban area would yield similar results. The implication is unsettling and clarifying at once: the living world around us is far stranger and more populated than we typically imagine.

The insects themselves matter more than their obscurity might suggest. Flies alone represent some of the planet's most diverse organisms, having evolved into countless ecological roles and forms. Many are genuinely beautiful when examined closely. More importantly, they and the countless other unnamed species maintain the ecological balance that keeps the planet functioning. We simply don't know how many species we depend on, or what happens when we lose them without ever knowing they existed. The project in New York's parks is not just a hunt for novelty. It's an attempt to map the actual living world—the one that exists whether or not we've named it.

The majority of Earth's animal species are still unknown to us humans. Scientists have formally named around 2 million species, but the actual number of species is perhaps 10 times higher.
— Emily Hartop, entomologist at NTNU University Museum
Every time we look closely, flies remind us that the living world is far more diverse, fascinating and mysterious than we imagine it.
— Emily Hartop
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Phys.org ↗
Contáctanos FAQ