Schools will be required to treat antisemitism as distinct harm, implement dedicated teacher training, and improve incident reporting rather than handling it through existing racism measures. Jewish schoolchildren report regular harassment; antisemitic incidents in schools jumped 59% in first half of 2026, reaching record levels, with some pupils reluctant to display religious symbols.
Schools to treat antisemitism as distinct safeguarding risk under new review
It's sad that we can't be equal to everyone else
So the core recommendation is that schools treat antisemitism separately from general racism and bullying. Why does that distinction matter?
Because it signals that this isn't just another form of prejudice to be handled through existing frameworks. It creates a specific duty, specific training, specific reporting. Right now it gets absorbed into general safeguarding, which means it can get lost.
But we should be clear: the review found the incidents are real and rising—59 percent jump in the first half of 2026. That's not interpretation. That's the Community Security Trust's count.
And the human cost—the pupils who won't wear religious symbols outside school, the security drills that have become normal for children. That's what the review documented?
Yes. And the headteachers spending more time on security than education. At Jewish schools, this has become the operating reality. The review is saying: this shouldn't be invisible or normalized.
Though we should note the IHRA definition the government wants schools to adopt—it's supported by mainstream Jewish organizations and 47 countries, but some of its examples have been controversial. The review doesn't resolve that tension.
So what happens next? The government accepts the 27 recommendations, and then what?
Schools have to implement them. Training, reporting systems, the hotline for advice. It becomes policy, not suggestion.
The key unknown is how schools actually resource this. Training costs money. Reporting systems cost time. The review recommends it; implementation is a different question.
And Bell said this is for all children, not just Jewish ones.
Right. The point is that antisemitism in schools affects the whole school community, the whole culture. It's not a Jewish school problem; it's a schools problem.
Though it's worth noting that the incidents are being documented primarily in and around Jewish schools and in the Jewish community's security reporting. We have good numbers there. The broader picture in non-Jewish schools is less clear.
El Pulso
- 27 recommendations in Bell review; government expected to accept all
- Antisemitic incidents in schools jumped 59% in first half of 2026 (112 to 178)
- Jewish schoolchildren report regular harassment; some reluctant to wear religious symbols
- Headteachers at Jewish schools spending significant time on security rather than education
- IHRA definition adopted by 47 countries; government will encourage but not mandate school adoption
Schools will be required to treat antisemitism as distinct harm, implement dedicated teacher training, and improve incident reporting rather than handling it through existing racism measures. Jewish schoolchildren report regular harassment; antisemitic incidents in schools jumped 59% in first half of 2026, reaching record levels, with some pupils reluctant to display religious symbols.
A government-commissioned review recommends England's schools recognize antisemitism as a specific safeguarding category rather than general bullying, with 27 recommendations expected to be accepted by Parliament.
On a Tuesday morning in October 2025, two men were killed in an attack at a synagogue in Manchester. That single incident became the catalyst for a broader reckoning: the government commissioned a formal review into antisemitism across England's schools and colleges, asking how institutions should respond to what had become, by any measure, a growing problem.
The review, led by Sir David Bell, the former chief inspector of schools, spent months gathering evidence from pupils, teachers, headteachers, governors, and parents across state and independent schools. What emerged was a picture of Jewish children navigating an educational system that had never quite named antisemitism as its own distinct threat. Instead, it had been folded into general measures against racism and bullying—treated as one form of prejudice among many, rather than as something requiring its own framework, its own training, its own response. Bell's review, due to be presented to Parliament on Wednesday, recommends a fundamental shift: schools and colleges should recognize antisemitism as a specific category of harm and take explicit action against it. The government is expected to accept all 27 recommendations.
The numbers tell part of the story. In the first half of 2025, the Community Security Trust, which advises the Jewish community on security matters, recorded 112 antisemitic incidents in schools. In the same period in 2026, that figure jumped to 178—a 59 percent increase and the highest level ever recorded for the first six months of any year. The review found that Jewish schoolchildren were experiencing regular harassment and abuse. At some Jewish schools, headteachers were spending more time managing security arrangements than on educational leadership.
Visit Yavneh College in Hertfordshire and you see what this looks like in practice. High gates. High fences. Security cameras. Four full-time security staff. Lock-in drills—sometimes called "in-vacuation" drills—have become routine, even for the youngest pupils. Spencer Lewis, the executive headteacher, described security as an "innate part" of his role. Staff and pupils have grown so accustomed to these measures that they barely register them anymore. A Year 6 pupil named Livi said the drills were "a bit scary sometimes, but you know you're safe." Her classmate Sadie added: "It's sad that we can't be equal to everyone else, but people don't like us just because of the way we are."
But safety inside the school gates does not extend beyond them. A group of older pupils told the BBC they feel targeted by reports of antisemitic attacks elsewhere in the country—incidents at other Jewish schools, harassment on commutes, confrontations at sports fixtures. Some said they were reluctant to wear skullcaps or necklaces bearing the Star of David outside school. A Year 9 pupil named Ilan put it plainly: "Other religions get to be out and wear their necklaces and be proud—I don't get why Jewish people can't do it as much."
The Bell review recommends dedicated training for teachers, more consistent recording and reporting of incidents, and better education about antisemitism and contemporary Jewish life. It also calls for stronger guidance on political impartiality in schools. The government is expected to establish a hotline where school leaders can access immediate advice on tackling antisemitism. Schools will be encouraged to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's working definition of antisemitism, though adoption cannot be made compulsory. That definition has been embraced by 47 countries and most British universities, though some of its examples have proven controversial.
Sir David Bell, now vice-chancellor of the University of Sunderland, framed the review's scope beyond any single community. "This is not just a report for Jewish children in Jewish schools," he told the BBC. "This is for all children and young people in all schools and colleges. We know that antisemitism crosses all boundaries." The Board of Deputies of British Jews said that treating antisemitism as a safeguarding issue would create an explicit duty on all schools to address it as they would any other threat to children's safety, strengthening accountability across the system. The Department for Education declined to comment before the review's formal publication.
Citas Notables
This is not just a report for Jewish children in Jewish schools. This is for all children and young people in all schools and colleges.— Sir David Bell, former Ofsted chief inspector and review author
Treating antisemitism in schools as a safeguarding issue will have the benefit of creating an explicit duty on all schools to address this as they would any other threat to children's safety.— Board of Deputies of British Jews spokesperson