At Scottish Labour's Glasgow conference, party leader Anas Sarwar offered a quiet but pointed observation about time and memory: the youngest voters of 2026 were toddlers during the independence referendum of 2014, and a generation shaped by different anxieties may not feel bound by the constitutional debates that have defined Scottish politics for a decade. His argument was less a policy announcement than a philosophical wager — that political identity is formed by what one lives through, not what one is told to remember. In repositioning Labour toward the centre, Sarwar is betting that econo
Sarwar: Independence won't drive young voters in 2026 Scottish election
They're going to base their politics on what energises them right now
So Sarwar is saying young voters won't care about independence in 2026. But isn't that a gamble? What if they do?
He's making a generational argument—that voters who were four during the 2014 referendum simply won't have the same emotional investment in it that older voters do. It's a reasonable observation about how political consciousness forms.
But here's the thing: he's predicting voter behavior four years out based on an assumption about age and memory. We don't actually know yet what will politicize that cohort. And independence could still be live if there's another push for it between now and 2026.
Fair point. So what's Labour actually betting on instead?
Economic issues, mainly. Jobs, growth, support for families. They're repositioning as a pro-business party and targeting young mothers specifically. It's a deliberate move away from the Corbyn years.
That's a strategic choice, but it's not a prediction about what voters will want. It's what Labour wants to talk about. Those aren't the same thing.
And what about the coalition question he raised?
He said Labour won't do formal coalitions with the SNP or Tories, but he also said he won't rule them out entirely. It's a careful position—he wants flexibility without looking unprincipled.
Which means he's keeping his options open while trying to sound principled. That's honest politics, but it's also non-committal. We won't know what Labour will actually do until after the election.
So the real story is that Labour is trying to make itself credible as an alternative government?
Exactly. Sarwar said it himself—he wants to be in a position where he can credibly claim he could be First Minister. Right now, the SNP dominates that space.
And that's the hardest part of his pitch. It's not enough to say young voters won't care about independence. He has to actually build a party that voters believe can govern. That takes more than a conference speech.
Il Polso
- Scottish Labour is staking its future on a generational shift, arguing that voters who were four years old during the 2014 independence referendum will not be defined by it.
- The SNP's decade-long grip on Scottish politics, built around the independence question, faces a quiet but serious challenge if younger voters simply do not feel its pull.
- Under Sarwar and Starmer, the party is deliberately shedding its Corbyn-era identity, pivoting to a pro-business, pro-growth platform aimed at young families and first-time voters.
- Sarwar is navigating coalition politics carefully — rejecting formal alliances with both the SNP and Conservatives while preserving enough flexibility to govern on a case-by-case basis.
- The 2026 Scottish Parliament election is now Labour's horizon, with Sarwar openly positioning himself as a credible First Minister candidate in a race that has long felt like Nicola Sturgeon's alone to lose.
At Scottish Labour's Glasgow conference, party leader Anas Sarwar offered a quiet but pointed observation about time and memory: the youngest voters of 2026 were toddlers during the independence referendum of 2014, and a generation shaped by different anxieties may not feel bound by the constitutional debates that have defined Scottish politics for a decade. His argument was less a policy announcement than a philosophical wager — that political identity is formed by what one lives through, not what one is told to remember. In repositioning Labour toward the centre, Sarwar is betting that economic aspiration and social need will speak louder than inherited constitutional allegiance when a new generation casts its first ballots.
On the final day of Scottish Labour's Glasgow conference, Anas Sarwar made a demographic argument that carried a larger political charge. The voters who will be old enough to cast ballots in 2026, he pointed out, were only four years old during Scotland's 2014 independence referendum. They carry no memory of that campaign, no lived stake in the constitutional debate that has dominated Scottish politics ever since. "Are we honestly saying that generation are going to base their politics on what happened when they were four?" he asked. His answer was no — and the implication for the SNP, whose political identity rests so heavily on that question, was clear.
The conference marked a deliberate repositioning for Scottish Labour. The party moved away from the Corbyn and Leonard years, presenting itself as pro-business, pro-growth, and focused on the practical concerns of working families. Sarwar argued that younger voters hold a different kind of aspiration from previous generations, and that young mothers and young families in particular would be central to Labour's organizing efforts going forward.
On the question of coalitions, Sarwar was careful. He said Labour councillors should avoid formal arrangements with either the SNP or the Conservatives, preferring to make decisions issue by issue in the interest of local communities — but he refused to rule out all working relationships, wary of appearing rigid.
The conference closed with deputy leader Jackie Baillie urging delegates to make clear to working families across Scotland that Labour was on their side. The party's strategic bet was now visible: that by 2026, the conversation will have moved from constitutional identity to economic reality, and that Labour — with Sarwar as a credible First Minister candidate — will be ready to meet it.
Anas Sarwar stood before journalists on the final day of Scottish Labour's conference in Glasgow with a straightforward prediction: when voters cast ballots in 2026, the question of Scottish independence will not be what moves the youngest among them. The Scottish Labour leader was making a demographic argument. Today's twelve-year-olds, he noted, will be eligible to vote in that election. But in 2014, when Scotland held its independence referendum, those same voters were only four years old. They have no memory of the campaign, no lived experience of the constitutional debate that has dominated Scottish politics for nearly a decade.
"Are we honestly saying that generation are going to base their politics on what happened when they were four?" Sarwar asked. "No, they're not. They're going to base their politics on what politicises them, what energises them, what enthuses them right now and over the next four years as well." His argument carried an implicit challenge to the Scottish National Party, which has built much of its political identity around the independence question. If Sarwar is right, that foundation may not hold with voters who came of age after the referendum.
The remarks came as Scottish Labour, under Sarwar and UK party leader Sir Keir Starmer, worked to reposition itself toward the political centre. The three-day conference marked a deliberate shift away from the Jeremy Corbyn and Richard Leonard eras, with the party emphasizing what it called a "pro-business, pro-growth and pro-jobs" platform. Sarwar suggested that younger voters were hungry for something different from what previous generations had offered. "Their form of aspiration is really, really different from my generation and our parents' generation," he said. Young families, particularly young mothers, would be a key target for Labour's organizing efforts.
Sarwar also addressed the mechanics of power. He said his personal view was that Labour councillors should avoid formal coalitions with either the SNP or the Conservative Party, instead making decisions on individual issues based on what served local communities. But he stopped short of ruling out working arrangements altogether. "I'm not going to get into this game of rule out coalitions with one party but accept coalitions with another," he said. The distinction mattered: Labour wanted flexibility without appearing unprincipled.
The larger ambition was unmistakable. Sarwar said he wanted to position himself as a credible alternative for First Minister by 2026. He criticized the previous election cycle, when only Nicola Sturgeon could realistically claim she would lead the government after the vote. "That's an embarrassment for our national politics," he said. Building that credibility would require sustained work over the next four years, he acknowledged, but it was work he believed Labour could do.
Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie reinforced the message in her closing speech to delegates on Sunday. The party's job, she said, was to ensure working families across Scotland understood that Labour had their interests at heart. "We are not here to play at politics," she told the conference. "We are here to help those in need and build a fairer society for all." She called on the party to challenge both the Tories and the SNP, framing the 2026 election as an opportunity to build something better. The conference had laid out Labour's strategic bet: that by 2026, the political conversation would have shifted from constitutional questions to the bread-and-butter concerns of families trying to get by, and that Labour could credibly offer itself as the party ready to address those concerns.
Citazioni salienti
Are we honestly saying that generation are going to base their politics on what happened when they were four? No, they're not.— Anas Sarwar, Scottish Labour leader
We are not here to play at politics. We are here to help those in need and build a fairer society for all.— Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour deputy leader