Samsung's Galaxy Watch 8 antioxidant sensor proves surprisingly useful for diet tracking

The watch detected a real dietary shift, but it was missing the full picture.
The Galaxy Watch 8 measures carotenoids but cannot track other important antioxidants like flavonoids and polyphenols.
Mark

So the watch is reading something real about what you eat, but only part of it?

Mimi

Exactly. It's reading carotenoids, which are real and important. But they're one family of antioxidants among many. The watch can't see flavonoids or polyphenols, even though those are doing the same protective work in your body.

Mark

Why can't it measure those?

Mimi

They don't have color. Carotenoids are visible because they're pigments—that's what makes carrots orange. The watch uses light to detect them. The other antioxidants are invisible to optical sensors.

Mark

Does that make the feature useless?

Mimi

No, but it makes it incomplete. I improved my score by 12 points in a week by eating better. The watch detected that. It's useful feedback. But someone eating tons of beans and tea might have excellent antioxidant levels that the watch never acknowledges.

Mark

So you're getting credit for part of the work you're doing.

Mimi

Right. And you might be doing more good than the score reflects. The watch is a tool, not the truth.

Mark

Would you use it again?

Mimi

Yes, because I hate food logging. But I wouldn't obsess over the number. It's a nudge, not a diagnosis.

  • A smartwatch that reads your skin like a nutritional report card has arrived — and it actually responds when you change what you eat.
  • The reviewer began at a humbling score of 53, meaning they were getting barely half the fruits and vegetables their body needed, with no food logging required to surface that uncomfortable truth.
  • One week of deliberate eating — salads, bell peppers, cantaloupe, cooked vegetables paired with healthy fats — pushed the score to 65, validating that the sensor tracks real dietary shifts rather than offering empty feedback.
  • The feature's ceiling is also its honest flaw: carotenoids are just one family of antioxidants, leaving flavonoids, polyphenols, and lycopene entirely invisible to the watch's optical sensors.
  • The trajectory points toward utility rather than perfection — a baseline tool that nudges behavior without demanding obsessive calorie counting, landing as a useful but incomplete mirror of nutritional life.

In the quiet negotiation between technology and the body, Samsung's Galaxy Watch 8 introduces a sensor that reads carotenoids stored beneath the skin — pigments accumulated through the eating of fruits and vegetables — offering a non-invasive window into nutritional habits. A reviewer, initially skeptical of a 'Low' reading, spent a week eating deliberately and watched their score climb twelve points, confirming that the watch responds to real change. The feature does not capture the full spectrum of antioxidants, only those visible to light, which is both its honest limitation and a reminder that no single instrument can hold the whole of human health.

Samsung's Galaxy Watch 8 carries a feature rare among smartwatches: an antioxidant index that measures carotenoids — the pigments behind the orange of carrots and the red of tomatoes — stored in your skin as a proxy for fruit and vegetable intake. Press your thumb to the sensor, and the watch uses multicolored LEDs to read what your diet has left behind, calibrated against clinical trials at Samsung Seoul Hospital. A score between 75 and 100 means you're meeting recommendations. Below 50 is critically low.

The reviewer began skeptical, opening at a score of 53. Rather than dismiss it, they ran an experiment: one week of eating as many carotenoid-rich foods as possible. Along the way, they discovered that raw vegetables, while nutritious, deliver fewer beta-carotenes than cooked ones paired with healthy fats. By day seven, the score had risen to 65 — representing roughly 80 percent of recommended intake — confirming the sensor was tracking something real.

The limitation is significant but honest. Carotenoids are only one category of antioxidant. Flavonoids, polyphenols, and lycopene — found in teas, beans, and many other foods — go entirely unmeasured because they lack the pigmentation optical sensors can detect. Someone eating a rich, varied diet full of these compounds would receive no credit from the watch.

What remains valuable is the feedback loop itself: a baseline that requires no food logging, responds to genuine change, and surfaces patterns that might otherwise go unnoticed. The watch isn't telling the full story of your antioxidant life — but the chapter it does tell turns out to be worth reading.

Samsung's Galaxy Watch 8 comes with a feature that most other smartwatches don't have: the ability to measure the antioxidants in your body by pressing your thumb against the watch face. The sensor reads carotenoids—the pigments that make carrots orange, tomatoes red, and spinach green—which accumulate in your skin and serve as a proxy for how much fruit and vegetables you're actually eating. It's a clever bit of engineering, but the real question is whether it works.

The reviewer started skeptical, especially after the watch told them their antioxidant levels were "Low." Rather than dismiss the reading, they decided to test it: spend a week eating as many carotenoid-rich foods as possible and see if the watch could detect the difference. The premise is straightforward. Carotenoids are one type of antioxidant—compounds that counteract oxidative stress from smoking, drinking, overeating, and chronic stress. The WHO recommends 400 grams of fruits and vegetables daily. Samsung's watch is designed to tell you, without any manual food logging, whether you're hitting that target.

Here's how it works: the Galaxy Watch 8's optical sensors detect carotenoids stored in your skin. You press your thumb against the sensor, which pushes blood away from the measurement area, allowing the multicolored LEDs to get a clean reading. Samsung calibrated the scoring system using clinical trials at Samsung Seoul Hospital, correlating fruit and vegetable intake with carotenoid accumulation. A score of 75 to 100 means you're meeting recommendations. Between 50 and 75 means you're getting 50 to 99 percent of what you should. Below 50 is critically low. The company also notes that stress, smoking, and drinking can tank your score, making this as much a lifestyle tracker as a nutrition one.

The reviewer started at 53—meaning they were consuming about 56 percent of the recommended daily amount. Over the next week, they loaded up on salads, bell peppers, cantaloupe, and other produce. They discovered something important along the way: raw vegetables are high in fiber and vitamins but low in beta-carotenes. Cooked vegetables paired with healthy fats—oil, meat, peanut butter—deliver far more carotenoids to your body. By day seven, their score had climbed to 65, representing 80 percent of recommended intake. The watch had detected a real dietary shift. Samsung says it can take up to two weeks for the full effect to show, and the trajectory suggested one more week of eating well would push the score to the target of 75.

But there's a catch. Carotenoids are just one type of antioxidant. Flavonoids, polyphenols, and lycopene—found in beans, teas, and countless other foods—are equally important for fighting free radicals and slowing aging. The Galaxy Watch 8 can't measure these because they don't have the pigmentation that makes carotenoids visible to optical sensors. So while the watch gave the reviewer useful feedback about one dimension of their diet, it was missing the full picture. A person eating tons of antioxidant-rich foods that don't contain carotenoids would get no credit from the watch, even though they're doing themselves real good.

The reviewer appreciated having a tool that didn't require obsessive food logging—a feature that appeals to people who care about eating well but hate calorie counting. The antioxidant index proved responsive enough to validate real dietary changes. But it's important to understand its limits. The watch isn't lying when it says your antioxidant levels are low; it's just measuring one piece of a much larger puzzle. The real value isn't in hitting a perfect score on Samsung's scale. It's in having a baseline, noticing when you slip, and using that feedback to make better choices. Everything else—all the antioxidants the watch can't see—is just extra credit.

Samsung warns that your score may fall during periods of severe stress or when drinking or smoking, so it's about lifestyle as much as nutrition.
— Samsung's guidance on antioxidant index factors
Raw vegetables are high in vitamins and fiber but low in beta-carotenes; you get the most carotenoids from cooked vegetables paired with healthy fats.
— Reviewer's finding from testing the feature
Fale Conosco FAQ