In the quiet competition between technological giants, Samsung prepares to enter a market category that Huawei has only just invented — the tri-foldable smartphone. The Galaxy G Fold, arriving second and priced between $2,500 and $3,000, carries both the burden of lateness and the advantage of global reach, reminding us that in innovation, being first and being best are rarely the same thing.
Samsung's Galaxy G Fold tri-foldable aims to challenge Huawei's market lead
Samsung arrives second, and that positioning carries real consequences.
Mark
So Samsung is building a tri-fold phone. Why does it matter that Huawei got there first?
Mimi
Because in a brand-new category, being first shapes how people think about what's possible. Huawei set the standard. Samsung now has to convince people their version is worth the wait and the cost.
Luke
But how much of that first-mover advantage actually sticks when Huawei faces sanctions and Samsung doesn't? That's a bigger factor than the calendar.
Mark
What's the actual difference between Samsung's tri-fold and Huawei's?
Mimi
We don't know much yet. Samsung's will fold both ways, use a different hinge system, and supposedly have better durability. But the crease problem—that visible line when you fold—Samsung hasn't solved it yet.
Luke
And that's worth saying plainly: we're working from leaks here, not official specs. Samsung hasn't confirmed any of this.
Mark
The price is wild. Three thousand dollars?
Mimi
For a device that's still first-generation, yes. Huawei's is even more expensive. These are luxury items right now, not mainstream phones.
Luke
The real question is whether the price reflects the technology or just scarcity. We won't know until Samsung actually ships units and we see what breaks.
Mark
Is Samsung's second-place position actually a problem?
Mimi
It depends on execution. If the Galaxy G Fold is more reliable and available in more places than the Mate XT, being second doesn't hurt much. But if it's just a copy with the same flaws, then yes, it's a problem.
Luke
And we should note: Samsung's own Z Fold 7 is coming soon with a supposedly invisible crease. That could cannibalize interest in the tri-fold before it even launches.
Le Pouls
- Huawei's Mate XT already holds the ground as the world's first tri-foldable, leaving Samsung to fight for relevance in a category it did not pioneer.
- The Galaxy G Fold's visible screen creases — the same flaw haunting the Z Fold 6 — risk making a $3,000 device feel unfinished before it even ships.
- Samsung's own Z Fold 7 is closing in with a crease-free display, threatening to make the tri-fold look dated the moment it reaches store shelves.
- To carve out its position, Samsung is betting on superior brand trust, global market access, and centered camera placement to outmaneuver Huawei's sanctions-limited reach.
- A limited regional launch signals Samsung's caution — the company is watching demand before committing to the full complexity of mass tri-fold production.
In the quiet competition between technological giants, Samsung prepares to enter a market category that Huawei has only just invented — the tri-foldable smartphone. The Galaxy G Fold, arriving second and priced between $2,500 and $3,000, carries both the burden of lateness and the advantage of global reach, reminding us that in innovation, being first and being best are rarely the same thing.
Huawei got there first. The Mate XT Ultimate Design arrived in early 2025 as the world's first tri-foldable smartphone to reach consumers, and Samsung is now preparing its answer — a device reportedly called the Galaxy G Fold, folding inward on both sides and carrying a new "G" designation that signals a tier beyond the existing Z-series.
What Samsung has working in its favor is considerable: no trade sanctions limiting its global reach, far stronger brand recognition across most markets, and a price point — $2,500 to $3,000 — that still undercuts Huawei's $3,500 Mate XT. At these figures, brand trust and market access become decisive factors for the small audience wealthy enough to consider either device.
Yet second place carries real costs. The Galaxy G Fold will reportedly maintain the same visible crease that marks the Z Fold 6, a disappointment at any price, let alone this one. The irony cuts deeper when Samsung's own Z Fold 7 is promising to eliminate that crease entirely, and Oppo's Find N5 has already reached market with an almost invisible fold line. Samsung finds itself chasing on multiple fronts at once.
The company is banking on a sturdier frame, centered camera placement for better angles across folding states, and the ringed camera design seen on recent flagships to differentiate the device. A limited regional rollout is expected first, with global expansion contingent on demand.
These are not mature products — they are expensive, visibly flawed, and solve no problem a conventional phone cannot. But they represent genuine engineering ambition. If the Galaxy G Fold executes well on durability and the mechanics of folding, Samsung could still emerge as the more trusted name in a category where, for now, Huawei stands alone.
Huawei got there first. In early 2025, the company unveiled the Mate XT Ultimate Design—the world's first tri-foldable smartphone to reach consumers. Now Samsung is preparing its answer, a device reportedly called the Galaxy G Fold, designed to fold inward on both sides and compete directly in a market category that barely exists yet.
The name itself signals Samsung's intent to create something distinct from its existing Z-series foldables. The "G" designation marks a new tier in the company's lineup, one that bends in ways the Z Fold 6 and its predecessors do not. But naming it and building it are different challenges. Early reports suggest Samsung will start with limited availability in select markets, rolling out globally only if demand justifies the production complexity.
What Samsung has working in its favor is straightforward: the company operates without the trade sanctions that constrain Huawei's reach, and it carries far greater brand recognition across most of the world. These advantages matter in a market where a tri-foldable phone costs between $2,500 and $3,000—a price point that already limits the audience to the genuinely wealthy. Huawei's Mate XT commands an even steeper price, around $3,500, despite trailing Samsung's phones in raw processing power according to benchmark tests. At these numbers, brand trust and market access become decisive.
Yet Samsung arrives second, and that positioning carries real consequences. The company's tri-fold will reportedly use a hinge system that enables smooth transitions between phone and tablet modes, but it will maintain the same visible crease that marks the current Z Fold 6. This is a disappointment. Meanwhile, the upcoming Z Fold 7 is promising to eliminate that crease entirely, and Oppo's Find N5 is already at market with an almost invisible fold line. Samsung finds itself chasing on multiple fronts simultaneously—trying to launch a tri-foldable while its own next-generation dual-fold device threatens to make the tri-fold look dated before it ships.
The company is banking on durability and camera placement to differentiate. The Galaxy G Fold will reportedly feature a sturdier frame similar to the Z Fold 7, and Samsung plans to position cameras at the center of the device for better photography angles across different folding states. It will adopt the ringed camera design seen on other recent Samsung flagships, though whether the company will refine that approach for tri-fold use remains unclear.
What matters most right now is that functional tri-foldables exist at all. These are not mature products. They are expensive, they have visible flaws, and they solve no problem that a conventional phone cannot solve. But they represent genuine innovation in form factor—the kind of engineering challenge that takes years to solve. Samsung's second-place arrival is not ideal, but it is not disqualifying either. If the Galaxy G Fold executes well on durability, camera performance, and the actual mechanics of folding, it could establish Samsung as the more reliable choice in a category where Huawei currently stands alone. The real test comes when these devices reach customers' hands.
Citations marquantes
Samsung has one great advantage over Huawei: it's not (yet) sanctioned and enjoys much better brand recognition across the world.— PhoneArena analysis
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur PhoneArena ↗
Politics & Governance