In the summer of 2024, Samsung entered the premium smartwatch arena with its Galaxy Watch Ultra, priced at $649.99 — a direct challenge to Apple's $799 Watch Ultra 2. Both devices are forged from titanium and sapphire, built to endure the extremes of human ambition, yet the deeper question they raise is not which is superior, but whether technology has become so ecosystem-bound that choice itself is an illusion. The watch on your wrist, it turns out, was largely decided the moment you chose your phone.
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Apple Watch Ultra 2: Which premium wearable wins?
You're locked in either way, no matter which watch you choose.
Mark
Why does it matter that Samsung's watch can't work with iPhones and vice versa? Aren't they both just smartwatches?
Mimi
Because a smartwatch is only as useful as the phone it talks to. It's not like choosing between two laptops. Your watch needs to sync with your phone, send you notifications from your phone, run apps that depend on your phone's ecosystem. Lock them together and you've locked in the customer.
Mark
So the person reading this should just buy whichever one matches their phone?
Mimi
In most cases, yes. But there are people who are considering switching phones anyway, or who use both platforms. For them, the question becomes: which watch is worth changing for? That's where the details matter.
Mark
What's the sleep apnea thing? Why is that such a big deal?
Mimi
Apple's Watch has been the fitness standard for years, but Samsung just got FDA approval to detect a serious medical condition that millions of people have and don't know about. That's not a gimmick. That's a feature that could actually change someone's health trajectory. Apple's working on it, but Samsung got there first.
Mark
The battery life numbers seem almost unbelievable. A hundred hours?
Mimi
It is, but there's a catch. That's with power-saving mode on, which means you're giving up features. It's like comparing a car's highway mileage to city mileage—technically true, but not how you'd actually use it. Still, even Samsung's normal 60 hours is nearly double what Apple offers.
Mark
Is there any reason to buy the Apple watch if you're an Android user?
Mimi
No. It won't work. You'd have to switch to iPhone. And that's a big ask just for a watch, even a good one.
Mark
What about the other way around?
Mimi
Same problem. If you're deep in the Apple ecosystem, the Galaxy Watch Ultra won't talk to your phone. You're locked in either way. The real question is whether the Galaxy Watch Ultra is good enough that an iPhone user would consider switching phones to use it. Most people won't. But some might.
Il Polso
- Samsung's Galaxy Watch Ultra arrives $150 cheaper than Apple's Watch Ultra 2, immediately pressuring the assumption that Apple's premium is justified.
- A critical tension emerges: Samsung's FDA-approved sleep apnea detection and 100-hour battery life give it genuine medical and practical advantages Apple cannot yet match.
- Apple counters with a larger display, official dive computer certification, and double the offline storage — advantages that matter deeply to specific users but not universally.
- The blood oxygen feature on Apple's Watch Ultra 2 has been stripped away due to a patent dispute, quietly eroding one of its flagship health credentials.
- Both companies are navigating toward the same destination — a comprehensive health and endurance wearable — but ecosystem lock-in means most consumers have no real crossroads to stand at.
- The arrival of a potential Apple Watch Ultra 3 looms over the entire comparison, threatening to redraw the competitive landscape before many buyers have made their decision.
In the summer of 2024, Samsung entered the premium smartwatch arena with its Galaxy Watch Ultra, priced at $649.99 — a direct challenge to Apple's $799 Watch Ultra 2. Both devices are forged from titanium and sapphire, built to endure the extremes of human ambition, yet the deeper question they raise is not which is superior, but whether technology has become so ecosystem-bound that choice itself is an illusion. The watch on your wrist, it turns out, was largely decided the moment you chose your phone.
When Samsung released its Galaxy Watch Ultra in July 2024 at $649.99, the inevitable comparison to Apple's Watch Ultra 2 — priced $150 higher — began almost immediately. On the surface, the two watches are strikingly alike: titanium cases, sapphire crystal screens, 3,000-nit brightness, LTE, dual-band GPS, and a shared ambition to be the most capable smartwatch a person can wear. They even weigh roughly the same.
But the honest answer to which is better begins and ends with one question: what phone do you carry? The Galaxy Watch Ultra will not pair with an iPhone. The Apple Watch Ultra 2 will not work with Android. Ecosystem lock-in is not a footnote — it is the entire story.
Set that aside, and the differences become more nuanced. Apple's watch offers a larger 1.9-inch display and holds the EN13319 dive computer certification that Samsung's watch lacks. Apple also doubles Samsung on offline storage at 64GB. Samsung, meanwhile, quietly abandoned its beloved rotating bezel, leaving both watches to rely on touchscreens and physical buttons.
Where Samsung pulls ahead most convincingly is battery life — 60 hours in normal use, stretching to 100 hours in power-saving mode, compared to Apple's 36 and 72 hours respectively. Samsung also secured FDA approval in early 2024 for sleep apnea detection, a meaningful health feature Apple has yet to offer. Apple's own blood oxygen monitoring has been removed from its watch amid a patent dispute, further narrowing its health tracking lead.
The $150 price gap is real, but neither watch is a poor choice — they are simply built for different people who have already, in a sense, made their decision. The only remaining variable is time: a rumored Apple Watch Ultra 3 could soon shift the entire equation.
Two smartwatches, both built from titanium and sapphire crystal, both priced well above $600, both promising to track your heart and your sleep and your steps for days without needing a charge. Samsung's Galaxy Watch Ultra arrived in July 2024 at $649.99, and almost immediately the question became unavoidable: does it dethrone Apple's Watch Ultra 2, which costs $150 more?
The honest answer is that it depends entirely on what phone lives in your pocket. The Galaxy Watch Ultra will not work with an iPhone. The Apple Watch Ultra 2 will not work with Android. This is not a small thing. This is the thing. Everything else—the design choices, the sensor arrays, the battery claims, the price difference—matters only if you've already decided which ecosystem you belong to.
But set that aside for a moment. The two watches are remarkably similar in their ambitions. Both weigh roughly 60 grams. Both use titanium cases and sapphire crystal screens. Both can reach 3,000 nits of brightness, which means you can actually see them in direct sunlight. Both offer LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-band GPS. They are, in other words, built to the same standard of ruggedness and capability.
Where they diverge is in the details. Apple's Watch Ultra 2 has a larger 1.9-inch OLED display compared to Samsung's 1.5-inch Super AMOLED screen. Apple's watch is officially rated for deep-water diving under the EN13319 standard—a certification Samsung's watch lacks, despite both meeting the same water resistance specs. Samsung, meanwhile, ditched its signature rotating bezel, a feature that would have given its watch a distinct navigation advantage. Instead, both rely on touch screens and physical buttons, though the button layouts differ slightly.
The processor comparison is instructive. Samsung's Exynos W1000 comes paired with 2GB of RAM and 32GB of storage. Apple's S9 SiP has only 1GB of RAM but double the storage at 64GB. For most users, this means Apple's watch can hold more music and maps offline, while Samsung's watch has more breathing room for multitasking. Neither difference is likely to matter much in real-world use.
Battery life is where Samsung makes its boldest claim. The Galaxy Watch Ultra reaches 60 hours on normal usage, but Samsung says it can stretch to 100 hours if you enable power-saving mode. Apple's Watch Ultra 2 manages 36 hours normally, or 72 hours with low-power mode enabled. That's a significant gap, though it's worth noting that Samsung's 100-hour figure requires you to accept reduced functionality.
The health and fitness tracking is where the story gets more interesting. Apple's Watch Ultra 2 has long been considered the gold standard for wearable health monitoring, but it's currently missing its blood oxygen feature due to an ongoing patent dispute. Samsung introduced a new BioActive sensor with the Galaxy Watch 7 and Ultra that promises more accurate readings across multiple biometric measurements. More notably, Samsung received FDA approval in February 2024 for sleep apnea detection on the Galaxy Watch Ultra—a feature that allows users over 22 to identify signs of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea, provided the watch is paired with a Samsung phone. Apple has been rumored to be developing similar functionality, but nothing has materialized yet.
The price difference is real: $150 separates these two watches. For that extra money, you get Apple's larger screen, its dive certification, and the established ecosystem of watchOS apps and developer support. For less money, you get Samsung's superior battery life, its sleep apnea detection, and a watch that's marginally lighter. Neither choice is wrong. Both companies have built excellent smartwatches. The decision, ultimately, comes down to which phone you use—and whether you're willing to change that phone to get the watch you want. There's also the looming question of whether Apple will release a Watch Ultra 3 in the coming months, which could shift the calculus entirely.
Citazioni salienti
The Watch Ultra 2 makes it tough to go back to using other smartwatches.— Michael Hicks, Android Central fitness reviewer
Users over the age of 22 can detect signs of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea with the Galaxy Watch Ultra, provided it's paired with a Samsung phone.— Samsung (regarding FDA-approved sleep apnea detection feature)
Vuoi la storia completa?
Leggi l'originale su Android Central ↗
Technology