Salmon DNA, Bird Droppings and Vampire Facials: What the Science Says About Viral Skincare

Skin priming, not volume: salmon DNA meets the dermis
A Seoul clinic's physician describes its popular salmon DNA injections as biostimulation rather than filler.
Mark

Salmon sperm injected into faces sounds like a joke. Is there anything real behind it?

Mimi

There's a lineage. Yi says it comes from wound-healing work, where fish DNA fragments were looked at for repairing tissue, including facial scars from combat injuries. Some studies suggest fewer fine lines.

Luke

Careful with 'some studies' and 'relatively sparse.' That's the article's own wording. It's a plausible rationale, not a settled result.

Mark

And the nightingale droppings?

Mimi

The ingredients make chemical sense. Zeichner points to urea, which is already in moisturisers, and guanine, an amino acid. But it's purified and modified, not street bird poop.

Luke

And note who paid for the research. Many studies were funded by the beauty industry or done by company scientists. That doesn't make them wrong, but it limits how confidently we can read them.

Mark

Why does the period blood mask get such a flat no?

Mimi

There's a 2018 study on menstrual plasma and wound healing, but Du-Harpur says no clinician would recommend it. She thinks it's about shock value and views.

Luke

Worth saying that a wound-healing study isn't evidence for a face mask. The article doesn't claim otherwise.

Mark

Vampire facials seem the most credible.

Mimi

They use your own blood and growth factors, and some studies show better elasticity in people in their 50s and 60s. But results vary with the equipment and with each person's blood.

Luke

Mixed evidence, in her words. And the 1.4-year biological age drop from collagen supplements came from an industry-funded study, so I'd hold that loosely too.

  • Salmon sperm DNA injections, once confined to a Seoul clinic, are spreading worldwide on the strength of celebrity enthusiasm and the glow of K-Beauty.
  • Evidence for fish DNA, bird droppings masks and vampire facials remains sparse, and many supporting studies were paid for by the companies selling them.
  • Researchers are pushing back hard against trends like period blood masks, which they say are driven by shock value and the chase for views rather than science.
  • Scientists are testing platelet-rich plasma and collagen supplements, but results vary widely between people and equipment, leaving outcomes uncertain.
  • Experts insist newcomers must prove they beat sunscreen and retinol, and the verdict is still open, with the cheap basics holding the advantage for now.

Across a crowded global market, a new generation of skincare treatments is drawing on the strange, the animal, and the ancient, from fish-derived DNA injected into the dermis to masks made from nightingale droppings. Such practices have a long human lineage, from Cleopatra's donkey milk to Roman remedies, and some old ingredients have endured scrutiny while others faded. The science behind today's fashions is real but thin, and much of it has been funded by the very industry selling the products. The question that will decide their place is whether they can outperform the modest, inexpensive basics already known to protect skin.

At the You & I Clinic in Seoul, one of the most requested treatments involves injecting tiny fragments of salmon sperm DNA into the dermis. The aesthetic physician Kyu-Ho Yi says the goal is not volume but biostimulation, a healthier skin environment that supports recovery. The idea borrows from regenerative medicine, where fish DNA was explored for helping repair scarred tissue, and some studies suggest it may soften fine lines, though the data remain thin. Dermatologist Joshua Zeichner notes that no one is quite sure who first tried it on skin, yet it is in use all the same.

The trend has travelled far from its Korean roots, carried by celebrities and the wider fascination with K-Beauty. It has company: masks made from nightingale droppings, sanitised under ultraviolet light and mixed with exfoliants, and vampire facials that spin a patient's own blood to concentrate growth factors. Strange skincare is hardly new. Cleopatra was said to bathe in donkey milk, and some historic ingredients, such as turmeric and seaweed, have survived into modern products. Zeichner points out that droppings are rich in urea and guanine, which can hydrate and brighten, but only when purified and modified, never scooped from the street.

Not every experiment earns the same welcome. Researchers reject period blood masks outright, with Beibei Du-Harpur calling them a product of shock and the hunt for views. Platelet-rich plasma fares better in her eyes, though results vary with the equipment and with each person's natural growth factors. Looking forward, scientists are exploring collagen supplements and treatments targeting the skin microbiome. Yet the test remains the same for every newcomer: can it beat sunscreen by day and a retinol moisturiser by night, the inexpensive basics that have already proven their worth.

At the You & I Clinic in Seoul, one of the most requested skin texture treatments involves injecting tiny fragments of salmon sperm DNA into the dermis, the thick middle layer of skin that holds blood vessels, nerves and glands. Kyu-Ho Yi, an aesthetic physician at the clinic and an adjunct professor at Yonsei University, says the aim is not volume, as with a filler, but what he calls skin priming or biostimulation: supporting a healthier dermal environment and recovery.

Yi says the idea comes from regenerative medicine and wound healing, where fish DNA fragments drew attention for their potential to stimulate tissue repair in people with facial scars from combat injuries. The data remain relatively sparse, but some studies suggest the treatments, which use purified polynucleotides from the sperm, may reduce the appearance of fine lines. Joshua Zeichner, an associate professor of dermatology at Mount Sinai Hospital in the US who has also consulted for skincare companies, says they have been shown to help hydration, plumpness, texture and wrinkles. He adds that it is unclear how anyone first decided to try this on skin, but it is in use regardless.

South Korea is now seen as a trendsetter in aesthetics, the so-called K-Beauty craze, and the appeal of salmon and other fish sperm injections has spread worldwide, encouraged by celebrities from Charli XCX to Jennifer Aniston. Alongside them have risen other odd-sounding treatments, including facemasks made of bird droppings and blood-drawing vampire facials.

Strange skincare is not new. Cleopatra is rumoured to have bathed in sour donkey milk. Women in Myanmar have worn thanaka, a paste of ground tree bark, for centuries, both as decoration and as sun protection. One notorious Roman blemish remedy called for the ground-up guts of a small crocodile. Some of the old ingredients have survived scrutiny: turmeric, tiger grass and seaweed appear in modern products for their anti-inflammatory and hydrating effects. A 2022 study examined 12th-century Italian skincare practices cited by the medical practitioner Trota of Salerno and found that ingredients such as fava beans and vinegar are now considered effective for cleansing, exfoliating and treating dry skin. Tartaric acid, extracted from tartar oil, is a common modern ingredient.

The so-called Geisha Facial uses droppings from nightingales. They are sanitised with powerful ultraviolet light, mixed with chemicals such as an exfoliant and a brightener, and applied like a mask. The technique traces to a centuries-old Japanese discovery that droppings from Japanese bush warblers, a type of nightingale, could remove dye from fabric, which led Japanese female entertainers to use them for skin whitening and removing heavy makeup. Zeichner says the droppings are especially high in urea, a skin-softening chemical common in moisturisers, and in the amino acid guanine, and amino acids have shown hydrating and brightening benefits. But the treatments use purified, modified droppings, he stresses: you shouldn't scoop bird poop off the street and rub it on your face. He also notes that many studies of these treatments were funded by the beauty industry or run by scientists employed by those companies.

Researchers are far less enthusiastic about menstrual masking, a TikTok trend of period blood face masks. A 2018 study suggested plasma from menstrual fluid might enhance wound healing more than regular blood plasma, but Beibei Du-Harpur, a dermatology researcher at King's College London, is unconvinced. No clinician would recommend it, she says, calling it a trend born of shock factor and the hunt for views.

She is more optimistic about platelet-rich plasma injections, the vampire facial. A patient's own blood is spun in a centrifuge to concentrate growth factors, the proteins that tell cells to grow, divide and repair, and then injected into facial skin with microneedles. Interest in the approach spans osteoarthritis, joint problems, alopecia and wound healing. For skin the evidence is mixed, though some studies found improved elasticity in people in their 50s and 60s, and fewer wrinkles and less pigmentation. Du-Harpur says results vary, because centrifuge machines differ and because people naturally carry different concentrations and types of growth factors.

Looking ahead, scientists point to better collagen supplementation. One recent industry-funded study used supplements with amino acids engineered for collagen replacement and reported better skin texture, hydration and elasticity over six months, plus an average 1.4-year reduction in biological age by saliva DNA tests. Other work targets the skin microbiome with prebiotics and postbiotics. Last year South Korean researchers described a bacterium found in blood that makes postbiotics able to reduce inflammation, oxidative stress and collagen damage, though only in petri dishes.

Zeichner's test for any newcomer is whether it beats the products already on the market, which he calls an open question. Rather than a $500 (£375) facial for a one-off glow, he would have people keep to sunscreen in the morning and, at night, a moisturiser with a collagen-stimulating ingredient such as retinol.

The question still is, do the fad treatments truly deliver better benefits than the traditional skincare products that we have on the market? That's still a bit of an open question.
— Joshua Zeichner, associate professor of dermatology, Mount Sinai Hospital
No clinician would ever recommend menstrual masking; it's a TikTok trend driven by shock factor and views.
— Beibei Du-Harpur, dermatology researcher, King's College London (paraphrased)
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su BBC News ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti