In the long and brutal arithmetic of modern siege warfare, Russia has turned its drones toward the bridges of Kyiv — the Pivnichnyi and Pivdennyi crossings over the Dnipro — striking both within days and threatening to divide a city of three million into disconnected halves. What began as a war of territorial conquest has evolved, by Ukraine's account, into a deliberate campaign to make urban life unlivable, targeting not soldiers but the sinews of civilization: bridges, hospitals, data centers, power lines. The question now hanging over Kyiv is not merely structural — whether the bridges will
Russia strikes second major Kyiv bridge as infrastructure attacks intensify
They want people to flee their cities.
Why are these two bridges so important? Kyiv must have other ways to cross the river.
The Pivnichnyi and Pivdennyi are the main road and rail crossings. Yes, there's the metro, and people can use other routes, but those two bridges handle the bulk of traffic between the eastern and western halves of the city. Closing them doesn't isolate Kyiv completely, but it does fracture it.
Right—and we should be clear about what "hit" means here. The drones damaged the road surface and the trolleybus wires. They didn't destroy the bridges. Experts say drones alone probably can't bring them down.
That's true. But the damage is real—two people were injured, traffic is snarled, and the threat of more strikes means the city can't rely on these crossings. The fear is sustained attacks that force permanent closures.
Is Russia claiming these are military targets?
Yes. Russia says the bridges are used to move Ukrainian troops and military cargo. Ukraine and its president say that's a cover story—that Russia is systematically destroying civilian infrastructure to terrorize the population into leaving.
Both claims could be true, actually. The bridges do carry military traffic. But they also carry civilians. That's the nature of critical infrastructure in a city at war.
What happens if the bridges actually do get destroyed?
Ukrainian officials have apparently discussed contingency plans—ferries, temporary pontoon bridges. But that would be a massive disruption. The city would be functionally divided.
And we should note: some of these bridges are already in poor condition. They've been carrying more traffic than they were designed for, for years. Repeated strikes could weaken them structurally even if they don't collapse outright.
Is this a new Russian tactic?
Russia has been targeting Ukrainian energy infrastructure for years, especially in winter. But the focus on these specific bridges, the repeated strikes—that does seem like a deliberate shift toward trying to fracture the city itself.
It's worth noting that Putin says this is retaliation for Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries and ships. Ukraine says it targets those facilities because they fund the war. So there's a claim-and-counterclaim about who started this particular escalation.
And it's working? The strikes are causing real disruption?
Yes. Friday's traffic gridlock was severe. Saturday's was less so, but still significant. The psychological effect is real too—people are worried about whether the city can stay connected.
Il Polso
- Two of Kyiv's only major river crossings have been struck within days, severing road, rail, and trolleybus links and plunging the capital into successive days of gridlock.
- Russia claims the bridges serve military logistics, but Ukraine's president says the real aim is to terrorize civilians into abandoning their cities — a war of displacement waged through destruction.
- Experts warn that even if drones cannot collapse the bridges outright, repeated strikes force closures and compound structural decay, while cruise missiles could finish the job entirely.
- Ukrainian lawmakers are already drawing up contingency plans — ferries, pontoon bridges — signaling that officials privately fear the main crossings may not survive the campaign.
- The violence has spread well beyond Kyiv: a sailor killed in Odesa, at least twelve injured across multiple regions overnight, and Russian drones crossing into Moldovan airspace.
In the long and brutal arithmetic of modern siege warfare, Russia has turned its drones toward the bridges of Kyiv — the Pivnichnyi and Pivdennyi crossings over the Dnipro — striking both within days and threatening to divide a city of three million into disconnected halves. What began as a war of territorial conquest has evolved, by Ukraine's account, into a deliberate campaign to make urban life unlivable, targeting not soldiers but the sinews of civilization: bridges, hospitals, data centers, power lines. The question now hanging over Kyiv is not merely structural — whether the bridges will hold — but existential: how long a people can sustain connection when everything that connects them is under fire.
On Saturday morning, Russian drones struck the Pivnichnyi Bridge in Kyiv — the second major crossing over the Dnipro to be hit within days. Two people were injured, the road surface was torn open, and the overhead wires powering the city's trolleybuses were severed. Mayor Vitaliy Klitschko announced the strike on Telegram as emergency crews mobilized and westbound lanes were closed.
The Pivnichnyi and Pivdennyi bridges are the only major road and rail connections between Kyiv's eastern and western halves. Until earlier that week, neither had been targeted. Now both had been struck repeatedly, cutting off vehicle traffic, rail lines, and trolleybus routes for a city of roughly three million. A second day of gridlock settled over the capital, and with it a darker fear: that Moscow's strategy was to keep hammering these crossings until Kyiv was effectively split in two.
Russia's military framed the strikes as targeting military logistics. The Kremlin renewed calls for foreign nationals and diplomats to evacuate. President Zelensky offered a different interpretation — telling the Financial Times that Putin had decided there were 'no rules now,' and that having failed to occupy Ukraine by force, Russia had shifted to mass destruction of civilian infrastructure: bridges, hospitals, schools, internet networks. 'They want people to flee their cities,' he said.
Experts cautioned that drones alone were unlikely to bring the bridges down, but repeated strikes would force closures and weaken structures already strained beyond their original design. Ukrainian lawmakers had begun discussing contingency measures — ferries and pontoon bridges — to maintain some connection across the river if the main crossings were destroyed.
Putin, speaking at the Valdai forum, framed the campaign as retaliation for Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil refineries and Black Sea naval assets, acknowledging those attacks had cost Russia roughly 1% of its GDP. Ukraine maintained it had targeted Russian energy infrastructure precisely because it funds the war.
The destruction extended far beyond Kyiv. A sailor aboard a civilian vessel was killed and three crew members wounded in a Russian strike on an Odesa port facility. At least twelve people were injured in overnight attacks across the Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkiv, and Kyiv regions. Moldova reported that five Russian drones and missiles had crossed its airspace and detonated near populated areas. The bridges of Kyiv had become both a strategic target and a symbol — of the city's connectivity, and of Moscow's determination to sever it.
On Saturday morning, Russian drones struck the Pivnichnyi Bridge, the second major crossing in Kyiv to be hit within days. The attack injured two people and tore into the road surface and the overhead wires that power the city's trolleybuses, forcing traffic to back up across the span. Mayor Vitaliy Klitschko announced the strike on Telegram as emergency services mobilized, noting that the bridge's westbound lanes had been closed.
The two bridges—the Pivnichnyi and the Pivdennyi, which sits to the south—cross the Dnipro River and form the only major road and rail connections between Kyiv's eastern and western halves. Until Thursday of that week, neither had been targeted. Now both had been struck repeatedly. The damage severed not just vehicle traffic but also the rail lines and trolleybus routes that move people across the river. A second day of traffic gridlock settled over the capital, though not quite as severe as Friday's paralysis. The city's roughly three million residents, many of whom depend on the metro to navigate Kyiv's width, now faced a new vulnerability: the possibility that Moscow's strategy would be to keep hammering these bridges until the city was effectively cut in two.
Russia's military claimed the drones had targeted the bridges because they were used to move Ukrainian troops and military cargo. The Kremlin also issued another call for foreign nationals, including diplomats, to evacuate Kyiv. But Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky framed the assault differently. In an interview with the Financial Times, he said Putin had decided there were "no rules now" in how Russia would wage war. The Russians had failed to occupy Ukraine by force, Zelensky explained, so they had shifted to a campaign of mass destruction—not just bridges, but data centers, internet infrastructure, mobile networks, hospitals, schools, universities. "They want people to flee their cities," he said.
Experts cautioned that Russian drones alone were unlikely to collapse the bridges outright. But the repeated strikes would force closures for inspection and repair, and each impact risked weakening the structures further. Some of Kyiv's bridges were already in poor condition, having carried far heavier traffic for far longer than their original design intended. More destructive weapons—cruise missiles, for instance—could bring them down entirely. Ukrainian lawmakers had apparently begun contingency planning: discussions had taken place about using ferries and temporary pontoon bridges to maintain some connection across the Dnipro if the main crossings were destroyed.
Klitschko, speaking after the Pivdennyi Bridge was attacked earlier in the week, had warned that Kyiv was now in a "very dramatic situation." Moscow was battering the city's critical infrastructure, its logistics networks, its housing stock, and other essential systems. The defense council had convened a crisis meeting on Friday to assess the damage and coordinate response.
Russian President Vladimir Putin justified the campaign as retaliation for Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil refineries and naval vessels in the Black Sea. At the Valdai foreign policy forum on Thursday, he said Russia had been receiving calls to stop the attacks but insisted Ukraine had started this escalation. He acknowledged that Ukraine's refinery strikes had achieved some results and that Russia had lost roughly 1% of its GDP to the damage. Ukraine, for its part, maintained that it had begun targeting Russian oil infrastructure precisely because those facilities fund the Kremlin's war effort.
The strikes extended beyond Kyiv's bridges. On Saturday, a sailor aboard a Liberian-flagged civilian vessel was killed and three crew members wounded when Russian forces attacked a port facility in the Odesa region. At least twelve people were injured in overnight Russian strikes across the Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkiv, and Kyiv regions. In the eastern Luhansk region, which Russia occupies, a Russian drone attack killed two people and injured three, according to the Moscow-installed regional administrator. Moldova, Ukraine's southwestern neighbor, reported that five Russian drones and missiles had crossed its airspace and detonated near populated areas in four districts, though no casualties were reported there.
The pattern was clear: Russia was widening and intensifying its assault on Ukrainian infrastructure and civilian targets. The bridges of Kyiv had become a focal point—symbols of the city's connectivity and, now, symbols of Moscow's determination to sever it.
Citazioni salienti
The Russians have failed to occupy us. So now they are carrying out massive attacks and mass killings. They want to destroy our bridges, our data centres, the internet, mobile networks, hospitals, kindergartens, schools, universities—everything.— Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in an interview with the Financial Times
Now from every direction we're receiving calls 'let's stop'. But they started it.— Russian President Vladimir Putin, at the Valdai foreign policy forum, defending Russia's strikes as retaliation for Ukrainian attacks on Russian refineries and ships