On a Monday in Southwark Crown Court, a former comedian known for his public persona heard his life rearranged by a single sentence: ten years and six months in prison, the consequence of a jury's finding, delivered only a week earlier, that he had raped one woman and sexually assaulted others across the years 2004 to 2009. The judge, Joel Bennathan, named the attitude beneath the acts, a 'casual arrogant disregard' for any woman's right to refuse, and in doing so placed the case within a familiar human pattern where fame and entitlement can make consent seem optional. The defendant, who is 51
Russell Brand Sentenced to 10 Years and Six Months for Rape and Sexual Assault
Four women were subjected to rape and sexual assault by Brand between 2004 and 2009, as found by the jury.
On a Monday in Southwark Crown Court, a former comedian known for his public persona heard his life rearranged by a single sentence: ten years and six months in prison, the consequence of a jury's finding, delivered only a week earlier, that he had raped one woman and sexually assaulted others across the years 2004 to 2009. The judge, Joel Bennathan, named the attitude beneath the acts, a 'casual arrogant disregard' for any woman's right to refuse, and in doing so placed the case within a familiar human pattern where fame and entitlement can make consent seem optional. The defendant, who is 51, sat without visible emotion while the terms were read, and what follows now is an appeal or nothing at all.
Russell Brand was sentenced at Southwark Crown Court on Monday to ten years and six months in prison, a week after a jury found him guilty of rape and three counts of sexual assault. The BBC's senior UK correspondent, Sima Kotecha, was in the courtroom as Judge Joel Bennathan passed sentence, and her account noted that the defendant showed no emotion.
The term is built from several parts. The rape carried nine years, and the three sexual assaults added terms of eighteen months, nine months and eight months. Brand is 51 and is described as a former comedian. The jury's verdicts concerned four women and offences committed between 2004 and 2009. The available reporting does not say which woman was involved in which count, nor does it set out the circumstances of each offence.
In his remarks, the judge spoke directly to Brand's attitude, saying he had shown a 'casual arrogant disregard to any woman's right to say no to you'. The phrase framed the sentence as a response not only to individual acts but to a pattern the court found in the evidence.
The human weight of the case rests with the four women whose accounts the jury accepted, and with a trial that asked jurors to weigh events more than fifteen years old. What comes next is not yet set out. A challenge to the conviction or the sentence on appeal is the development to watch.
Russell Brand was sentenced on Monday at Southwark Crown Court to 10 years and six months in prison, a week after a jury found him guilty of rape and three counts of sexual assault. The BBC's senior UK correspondent, Sima Kotecha, was in the courtroom as Judge Joel Bennathan passed sentence, and her account of the hearing was headlined with the observation that the defendant showed 'no emotion'.
The sentence is made up of several parts. For the rape, Brand received nine years. On top of that came separate terms for the three sexual assaults: 18 months, nine months and eight months. Together they make up the total of 10 years and six months.
Brand is 51 and is described in the BBC's reporting as a former comedian. The jury's verdicts, delivered last week, related to four women and to offences between 2004 and 2009. The source material does not break down which woman was involved in which count, and it does not set out the circumstances of each offence, so those details are not given here.
In his sentencing remarks, Judge Bennathan addressed Brand's attitude toward the women directly. He said Brand had shown a 'casual arrogant disregard to any woman's right to say no to you'. It is a pointed phrase from a judge, and it frames the sentence as a response not only to individual acts but to a pattern of attitude that the court found in the evidence.
The human cost of the case is carried by the four women whose accounts the jury accepted. The offences took place between 2004 and 2009, so the case reaches back well over a decade and a half, and the verdicts came after a trial in which the jury weighed events from that long-ago period.
What the BBC report offers beyond the figures is a description of the courtroom itself. Kotecha was present when the sentence was handed down, and the report's framing, 'what happened in court', points to Brand's demeanour as the thing observers noted: he showed no visible emotion as the term was read out.
What comes next is not set out in the material available. In cases of this kind, a defendant may seek to challenge a conviction or a sentence on appeal, and that is the development to watch. For now, the court's position is clear: guilty on all four counts, and more than ten years in prison.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
Brand showed a 'casual arrogant disregard to any woman's right to say no to you'.— Judge Joel Bennathan, sentencing remarks
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei BBC News ↗
Crime & Justice