In Rotorua, a fifteen-year-old named Niksha Pardal stood before judges and made the case that imagination precedes all human achievement — that before any discovery, any act of compassion, or any cultural meaning, there must first be the capacity to picture what does not yet exist. Her speech, woven from mythology, science, and philosophy, won a national competition and earned her an invitation to Parliament, where she and her fellow finalists will soon debate in the very chamber where such ideas are tested against reality. It is a quiet reminder that the voices shaping tomorrow's institutions
Rotorua teen wins national speech competition, earns Parliament invitation
Imagination tells us what the world could be, not just what it is
What was her actual argument? I want to understand what she said, not just that she won.
She started with Einstein—imagination is more important than knowledge. But she didn't just repeat the quote. She built it. Knowledge is what we learn through experience and observation. Imagination is the mind's power to form ideas that have never existed in reality. She said every invention begins with someone imagining what could exist before knowledge makes it real.
That's a fair framing. But did she define her terms clearly enough for a judge to follow? Or was it more poetic than argumentative?
She used examples. The Wright brothers imagining flight. Early humans creating myths like Papatūānuku and Ranginui to explain the world. She said those stories weren't just explanations—they were sources of hope.
So she was arguing that imagination drives hope, which drives human progress?
Yes, but also that imagination builds empathy. By imagining ourselves in someone else's position, we understand their emotions. She connected that to aroha—the Māori concept of compassion—and said that's crucial to New Zealand culture.
That's a stronger argument than it sounds. But I want to know: did the judges say why she won? Was it the content, the delivery, the originality? The article doesn't say.
It doesn't. We know she also did an impromptu speech on "courage is contagious" in three minutes, and she said that went well. But there's no feedback from the judges about what made her stand out.
What about the other finalists? What were they arguing?
The article says they followed a more scientific path—talking about how imagination led to inventions. So Niksha's approach was different. She was drawing on cultural and philosophical ground, not just technological innovation.
That could explain why she won, actually. If everyone else was making the same scientific argument, and she brought mythology and empathy into it, that's distinctive. But again, we don't have confirmation of that from the judges.
What happens next for her?
She and the finalists go to Parliament on October 19 for a mock debate. She's thinking about studying medicine or law after school. This is experience-building for her.
And we don't know yet what the mock debate will be about, or how it will be structured, or what comes after that. It's an invitation, not a guarantee of anything. But for a fifteen-year-old, it's a real opportunity.
Le Pouls
- A fifteen-year-old from Rotorua entered a national speech competition with an argument that cuts against the grain of how schools typically measure intelligence — placing imagination above knowledge.
- The stakes sharpened in the impromptu round, where finalists had just three minutes to prepare a speech on 'courage is contagious,' a test of composure that Pardal had never faced before — and passed.
- Her speech stood apart from competitors by refusing the purely scientific path, instead braiding Māori mythology, Einstein, and the concept of aroha into a single argument about what imagination does for the human spirit.
- The win has opened a door to Parliament, where on October 19 she and the other finalists will participate in a mock debate — a rehearsal for a future in law or public life that suddenly feels within reach.
In Rotorua, a fifteen-year-old named Niksha Pardal stood before judges and made the case that imagination precedes all human achievement — that before any discovery, any act of compassion, or any cultural meaning, there must first be the capacity to picture what does not yet exist. Her speech, woven from mythology, science, and philosophy, won a national competition and earned her an invitation to Parliament, where she and her fellow finalists will soon debate in the very chamber where such ideas are tested against reality. It is a quiet reminder that the voices shaping tomorrow's institutions are already forming their arguments today.
Niksha Pardal was fifteen when she told a panel of judges that imagination matters more than knowledge. The Rotorua student had spent two weeks shaping the idea into something real — an argument drawn from mythology, invention, and empathy — and it won her a national speech competition. She and the other finalists have now been invited to Parliament for a mock debate on October 19.
The prompt could have stayed shallow. Instead, Pardal went looking for what imagination actually does. She acknowledged that schools prize knowledge — the facts and understanding built through learning — but argued that imagination comes first. Before the Wright brothers built a plane, they had to picture one. Before anyone named the stars, someone had to wonder. She traced this capacity not only through scientific history but through culture: the Māori story of Papatūānuku and Ranginui, earth and sky separated to create the world, was never just an explanation. It was a source of hope in an unknowable universe.
She also argued that imagination is the engine of empathy. To understand another person's experience without having lived it requires an imaginative leap — and that leap, she suggested, is the foundation of aroha, the Māori concept of compassion extended to others, to the land, and to oneself. Imagining better days, she said, is what carries people through hardship.
When the impromptu round arrived, Pardal had never done one before. Given three minutes to prepare on 'courage is contagious,' she found a hook, built her points, and landed a conclusion. It went better than expected. Her mother, Manjula, who had watched her daughter perform since she was nine, called the national win a reflection of the confidence and dedication Niksha had grown into over years.
Now Niksha is thinking about medicine or law, and the mock parliamentary debate will offer her a first look at the room where such thinking becomes consequential. For a teenager already arguing that imagination shapes the world, the invitation feels less like a reward and more like a beginning.
Niksha Pardal was fifteen when she stood before a judging panel and told them that imagination matters more than knowledge. The Rotorua student had spent two weeks writing and rehearsing the speech, turning an abstract idea into something concrete—a argument built on mythology, invention, and the human capacity for empathy. She won the national competition. Now she and the other finalists have been invited to Parliament for a mock debate on October 19, a chance to test what they've learned in a room where real decisions get made.
The prompt itself might have seemed unpromising. Imagination versus knowledge—the kind of thing that sounds like a school assembly cliché. But Pardal went deeper. She acknowledged the obvious tension: schools teach us to value knowledge, the accumulated facts and understanding we gain through learning and observation. Yet imagination, she argued, is what comes first. It's the mind's capacity to form ideas that have never existed in reality. Before the Wright brothers built an airplane, they had to imagine one. Before anyone named the stars, someone had to wonder what they were.
She drew on Einstein's famous claim that imagination is more important than knowledge, but she didn't stop there. She traced imagination through human history—not just through scientific discovery, but through culture and meaning-making. Early humans used imagination to explain the world around them through stories that still endure. Papatūānuku and Ranginui, the earth mother and sky father pushed apart by their children to create the world—these weren't just explanations. They were sources of hope, ways of finding meaning in an unknowable universe. Without that imaginative capacity, Pardal suggested, humans would have had no reason to move forward, no sense that better days were possible.
In her view, imagination does something else too: it builds empathy. By imagining ourselves in someone else's position, we develop the ability to understand their emotions without having lived their exact experience. This matters in a New Zealand context, she argued, because aroha—the Māori concept of compassion and care—depends on that imaginative leap. We show aroha to each other, to the land, and to ourselves. And showing it to ourselves means imagining better days than the ones we're living through, which becomes crucial for anyone facing hardship.
When the competition moved to the impromptu round, finalists were given three minutes to prepare a speech on "courage is contagious." Pardal had never done an impromptu speech before. She stayed calm, thought of a hook and key points, and structured a conclusion. It went better than she expected. Other finalists had taken more scientific paths, focusing on how imagination led to concrete inventions. Pardal's approach was different—she wove together mythology, philosophy, and lived experience into an argument about what imagination actually does for human beings.
Her mother, Manjula Pardal, has watched her daughter's confidence grow over years. When Niksha was nine, she did a character recital on stage after just a few weeks of classes. Her mother was struck by how impressed the judges were, how naturally the girl performed. Now, at fifteen, Niksha has won a national competition and earned an invitation to Parliament. Her mother called it a wonderful achievement, a reflection of the confidence, dedication, and effort her daughter brought to the work.
Niksha is thinking ahead to university, considering either medicine or law. The mock parliamentary debate on October 19 will give her and the other finalists a chance to see what formal debate looks like in the actual place where it happens. For a teenager considering a future in law or public life, that's not a small thing. It's a glimpse into a world where the ability to think clearly, argue persuasively, and imagine what could be—rather than just accepting what is—becomes the work itself.
Citations marquantes
Imagination allows us to put ourselves in the shoes of others, lets us form empathy, lets us form hope throughout history.— Niksha Pardal, in her speech
This is a wonderful achievement for Niksha, and we are extremely proud of the confidence, dedication and effort she put into the competition.— Manjula Pardal, Niksha's mother