Rising Seas Threaten Habitats of Over 40% of the World's Land Vertebrates by 2100

Only 5.9% of these species are considered at risk from climate change
Most species facing habitat loss to rising seas are not flagged as climate-threatened on the IUCN Red List.
Mark

The headline number is 42%. What does that actually mean?

Mimi

It means those species lose some part of their habitat, not that they vanish. Between 14,325 and 15,324 species are exposed by 2100, depending on the emissions scenario.

Luke

Right, and exposure is not extinction. For most, the loss is small. At the 10% threshold under the highest emissions, it's 109 species by 2100.

Mark

So why does the study matter if most losses are modest?

Mimi

Because only 5.9% of the exposed species are currently listed as at risk from climate change. The Red List isn't capturing this threat.

Mark

And the refugia finding?

Mimi

Ninety-six percent of the areas likely to stay above water sit outside protected areas. That's the gap Jiang describes.

Luke

Worth saying that's the authors' modeling. Refugia are projected, not observed, and the source doesn't say how much of that land is actually available for protection.

Mark

Why Southeast Asia, if the Amazon delta loses more?

Mimi

Many coastal species there have small ranges and are already threatened. Borneo, Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia host nearly three times as many threatened species in flooded areas as elsewhere.

Luke

And the authors say their numbers are conservative, since storm surges and salt spray aren't included. That's their claim; the article doesn't give a figure for how much worse it could be.

Mark

What comes next?

Mimi

Protection decisions in places like Myanmar, Vietnam and Indonesia, where funding is thin.

  • More than 14,000 species now face coastal inundation of their habitat, yet only 5.9% are currently flagged as at risk from climate change.
  • Sea level is climbing at 4.7 millimeters a year, more than double the pace of the early 1990s, and the losses compound with every decade of high emissions.
  • Reptiles bear the heaviest burden, and three species could lose over half of their global range, including the Catalina chuckwalla and a Brazilian worm lizard.
  • Roads, dykes and seawalls are blocking mudflats, saltmarshes and mangroves from retreating inland, a squeeze that threatens migratory bird stopovers.
  • Ninety-six percent of the refugia that could shelter these species lie outside protected areas, and the countries holding them often lack funding to guard them.
  • Experts are pressing for international funding and limits on coastal hard infrastructure before the refugia are lost to the tide.

A Science study has given numerical weight to a concern that conservationists have long voiced in pieces: by 2100, rising seas may erode habitat for more than four in ten of the world's land vertebrates. Mapping roughly ninety percent of known amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals against sea level projections from five climate scenarios, the researchers reveal a pattern in which the most vulnerable creatures are often the least noticed, and the places they might retreat to are largely unguarded. The question the study poses is less about whether the water will advance than about whether humanity will act while there is still dry ground to hold.

A study published in Science has traced the rising sea across the lives of tens of thousands of land animals. Researchers laid habitat maps for some 34,120 amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals over five projections of sea level rise, and found that between 14,325 and 15,324 species could lose part of their range to coastal flooding by 2100. Only a sliver of those species, 5.9 percent, are currently recognized as threatened by climate change on the IUCN Red List, which suggests how much of this risk has gone unseen.

The damage grows with emissions and with time. Under the highest scenario, the number of species losing more than a tenth of their habitat rises from 18 in 2050 to 109 by 2100, most of them reptiles. Some face near-total loss: the Catalina chuckwalla, the Restinga toadlet and a Brazilian worm lizard could each lose more than half of their global range. Co-author Zhong-Wen Jiang argues that stronger mitigation could still shrink both the number of species exposed and the severity of their losses.

The Amazon delta stands out, with more than 100,000 hectares of forest and wetland expected to flood by 2050, while Borneo, Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia shelter far more threatened species than anywhere else in the flooded zones. The study also found that 96 percent of the refuges where animals might survive lie beyond protected boundaries. Myanmar, Vietnam and Indonesia could expand protection, but their conservation budgets and expertise are limited, which is why the authors call for international support.

The effects are already appearing, from flooded shorebird nests in Europe to the expected loss of most Sundarbans mangroves for Bengal tigers by 2070. The Bramble Cay melomys, declared extinct in 2016, stands as an early warning. The authors consider their figures conservative, since they exclude marine zones, salt spray and stronger storms. Ecologist Jennifer Magel warns that coastal defenses can trap wetlands against the sea, and the message from the researchers is that the choices about where to protect land must be made now, while the refuges remain above water.

A study published in Science has put a number on something conservationists have mostly discussed in fragments: more than 42% of the world's land vertebrates could lose some of their habitat to the sea by 2100. The researchers overlaid habitat suitability maps for 34,120 species, roughly 90% of all known amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, with sea level rise projections drawn from five IPCC climate scenarios, from low to high emissions.

Depending on the scenario, between 14,325 and 15,324 of those species would be exposed to habitat loss from coastal inundation by the end of the century. Yet only 5.9% of them are currently listed as at risk from climate change in their IUCN Red List assessments. Up to 63% of birds, 52% of mammals, 36% of reptiles and 24% of amphibians are likely to be affected. Reptiles, narrow-ranging species and already threatened species stand out as especially vulnerable, and reptiles are expected to lose nearly twice as much habitat as birds or mammals.

The losses grow with emissions and with time. Under the highest emissions scenario, the number of species losing more than 10% of their habitat climbs from 18 in 2050 to 109 by 2100, with more than half of those being reptiles. Three species are projected to lose over half of their global habitat: the Catalina chuckwalla, the Restinga toadlet, and a Brazilian worm lizard, Amphisbaena littoralis. At the 1% threshold, 395 species are affected under low emissions and 1,180 under high emissions, according to co-author Zhong-Wen Jiang of Sun Yat-sen University. Stronger mitigation, she said, could reduce both the number of species exposed and the severity of loss.

The pace of the underlying change is not slow. The World Meteorological Organization reports that global mean sea level rose an average of 4.7 millimeters a year between 2015 and 2024, more than double the rate of 1993 to 2002.

Geographically, the Amazon River delta is expected to see the greatest extent of habitat loss, partly because of its exceptional biodiversity. More than 100,000 hectares of riparian forest and coastal wetland there could be inundated by 2050. Central America and Southeastern Africa are also high-risk coasts. Southeast Asia has proportionally less habitat at risk than the Amazon delta, but many of its coastal species have small ranges and are already threatened. Flooded habitats in Peninsular Malaysia, Borneo and Sumatra support nearly three times as many threatened species as the rest of the world.

The study also mapped refugia, areas within species' ranges likely to stay above water. Ninety-six percent of them lie outside existing protected areas. Myanmar, Vietnam and Indonesia are singled out as places where protection could be extended to such refugia, though Jiang noted that these countries often lack conservation funding and technical capacity, which is why she argues for international cooperation to direct resources there.

The effects are already visible. European shorebirds face habitat loss and flooded nests. In the Bangladesh Sundarbans, the Bengal tiger is expected to lose most of its mangrove habitat by 2070. In 2016, the Bramble Cay melomys, a rodent from a small coral islet in the Torres Strait, was declared the first mammal extinct because of human-caused sea level rise.

The authors call their results conservative. They count only terrestrial habitat, leaving out marine and intertidal zones, and do not account for salt spray, stronger hurricanes or storm surges. Jennifer Magel, a University of British Columbia conservation scientist not involved in the work, said she expects all but a handful of shorebird species to be exposed. Her 2026 review describes "coastal squeeze," where roads, dykes and seawalls stop mudflats, saltmarshes and mangroves from migrating inland. Losing even a few key stopover sites can hurt whole migratory populations. She urges limiting infrastructure and permanent coastal defenses so wetlands have room to move.

The researchers' message is about timing: decisions on where to protect land are being made now, while the refugia are still dry.

Conservation planning needs to consider not only where species occur today, but also which parts of their habitat are projected to remain above water in the future.
— Zhong-Wen Jiang, Sun Yat-sen University
Decision-makers need to factor the impacts of future sea level rise into land use and conservation decisions that are being made now.
— Jennifer Magel, University of British Columbia
Contáctanos FAQ