On the morning of May 28, Malaysia's ringgit found itself navigating a world of competing forces — strengthening against the yen, euro, and pound, yet yielding fractionally to the US dollar as geopolitical uncertainty over US-Iran negotiations and the shadow of Federal Reserve rate decisions kept investors in a posture of careful restraint. The currency's split performance was less a story of Malaysian weakness than a reflection of the broader human condition in markets: the difficulty of acting decisively when the signals refuse to resolve into clarity. In such moments, currencies become mirr
Ringgit mixed as US-Iran tensions weigh on dollar sentiment
Conflicting signals dominate how traders think about risk
Mark
So the ringgit got stronger against most currencies but weaker against the dollar. That seems backwards—why would it strengthen against everything except the one that matters most?
Mimi
It's not backwards if you think about what's driving each move. The dollar is the safe haven right now. When investors get nervous about Iran and the Fed, they buy dollars. But against regional currencies, the ringgit is just doing what it normally does—it's part of a regional basket that moves together.
Luke
But how much of that dollar weakness is actually about the ringgit getting stronger, versus the dollar just being flat? The index barely moved—0.04 percent. That's noise.
Mimi
Fair point. The ringgit fell against the dollar, not the other way around. The strength against yen and euro is real, but it's not because the ringgit is surging. It's because those currencies are weaker.
Mark
And the Iran thing—how much is that actually moving markets versus how much is it just an excuse traders use to explain moves that happened for other reasons?
Mimi
That's the honest question. Rashid says Iran uncertainty is dominating sentiment, but he also mentions record equity highs and AI optimism. Those are pulling in the opposite direction. So which one is actually winning?
Luke
The oil prices tell you something. WTI up 1.4 percent, Brent down 5.3 percent. That's not a coherent signal about geopolitical risk. That's confusion.
Mark
So what's the actual forecast here? Rashid says 3.95 to 3.97 for the ringgit-dollar pair. That's a pretty tight range.
Mimi
It's a holding pattern. He's saying the market doesn't know which way to break until something clarifies—either Iran talks collapse, or the Fed signals its next move, or earnings disappoint.
Luke
Or until Trump says something else about the Strait of Hormuz. That seems to be the real variable here—not the negotiations themselves, but how hostile Trump stays publicly.
Der Puls
- Conflicting signals from US-Iran nuclear talks — progress suggested by Tehran, skepticism broadcast by Washington — left currency traders unable to commit to a clear direction.
- Oil markets amplified the confusion, with WTI crude rising while Brent fell sharply, a rare divergence that exposed just how fractured energy market sentiment had become.
- The looming possibility of US Federal Reserve rate hikes added a second layer of caution, threatening to strengthen the dollar and pressure emerging market currencies like the ringgit.
- Record global equity highs and strong AI-sector earnings pulled sentiment in the opposite direction, partially neutralizing dollar strength and keeping risk appetite alive.
- The ringgit's chief economist forecast a tight trading band of RM3.95–3.97 against the dollar — a narrow corridor that speaks to a market in a holding pattern, not a market with conviction.
On the morning of May 28, Malaysia's ringgit found itself navigating a world of competing forces — strengthening against the yen, euro, and pound, yet yielding fractionally to the US dollar as geopolitical uncertainty over US-Iran negotiations and the shadow of Federal Reserve rate decisions kept investors in a posture of careful restraint. The currency's split performance was less a story of Malaysian weakness than a reflection of the broader human condition in markets: the difficulty of acting decisively when the signals refuse to resolve into clarity. In such moments, currencies become mirrors of collective anxiety, hovering in narrow ranges while the world waits for something to move.
Malaysia's ringgit opened May 28 with a divided character. Against the Japanese yen, euro, and British pound, it gained ground — a sign of relative regional confidence. But against the US dollar, it slipped modestly to 3.9670 from the previous close of 3.9660, a small number carrying a larger meaning.
The source of the tension was twofold. US-Iran negotiations remained unresolved, with Iranian state media suggesting forward momentum while President Trump's public statements — particularly regarding the Strait of Hormuz — projected continued American skepticism. Bank Muamalat's chief economist, Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid, identified the core problem: conflicting signals were paralyzing trader judgment on risk.
Energy markets mirrored this confusion. WTI crude climbed over one percent while Brent crude fell sharply, an unusual divergence that reflected the same fractured sentiment. The US Dollar Index barely moved, sitting near 99.21 — essentially flat, as if the market itself had decided to wait.
Counterbalancing the caution were genuine reasons for optimism. Global equity markets had reached record highs, corporate earnings were beating expectations, and enthusiasm around artificial intelligence continued to draw investor interest — forces that supported riskier assets and capped the dollar's potential gains.
Rashid's outlook for the session was deliberately modest: a ringgit-dollar range of 3.95 to 3.97, a forecast that captured the day's essential truth. The market was not moving — it was waiting. Waiting for Iran, for the Fed, for the next signal from Washington. Until something shifted decisively, the ringgit would remain suspended between regional strength and dollar-driven caution.
The ringgit opened the trading day on May 28 with a split personality. Against most of the world's major currencies, Malaysia's currency gained ground—strengthening against the Japanese yen, the euro, and the British pound. But when it came to the US dollar, the picture inverted. The ringgit slipped to 3.9670 against the greenback, down from Tuesday's closing rate of 3.9660, a modest retreat that reflected something larger moving beneath the surface of the market.
The culprit, according to analysts watching the currency flows, was a familiar cocktail of geopolitical risk and monetary uncertainty. Investors were treading carefully as negotiations between the United States and Iran remained in flux, their outcome still unknowable. The signals coming out of Tehran suggested progress—Iranian state media indicated talks were moving forward—but US President Donald Trump's public posture told a different story. His recent comments about the Strait of Hormuz, asserting that no single country should control the waterway, signaled continued American skepticism about the talks and the Iranian position. Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid, chief economist at Bank Muamalat Malaysia, described the situation plainly: conflicting signals were dominating how traders thought about risk.
Oil markets reflected this same tension. West Texas Intermediate crude rose 1.40 percent to $89.92 per barrel, suggesting some traders were pricing in geopolitical premium. Brent crude, by contrast, fell 5.31 percent to $94.29 per barrel, a divergence that underscored the confusion rippling through energy markets. The US Dollar Index, a measure of the greenback's strength against a basket of currencies, hovered near 99.21 points, up just 0.04 percent—essentially flat, unmoved by the day's developments.
Beyond the Iran question lay another source of caution: the specter of inflation and the possibility that the US Federal Reserve might respond by raising interest rates. Higher US rates would typically strengthen the dollar, making it more attractive to investors seeking yield. Yet this headwind was being offset by other forces. Equity markets globally, including the US, had reached record highs. Earnings reports were coming in stronger than expected, and the artificial intelligence sector continued to draw optimistic investor attention. These currents were pulling sentiment in the opposite direction, supporting riskier assets and limiting the dollar's upside.
Across the currency board, the ringgit's performance that morning painted a nuanced picture. It climbed to 2.4859 against the yen from 2.4917, gained against the euro at 4.6089 from 4.6172, and strengthened versus sterling to 5.3217 from 5.3470. Against the Thai baht, it moved higher to 12.1445 from 12.1485. The Singapore dollar proved slightly stronger, pushing the ringgit down to 3.1041 from 3.1038. Against the Philippine peso and Indonesian rupiah, the ringgit held steady, neither gaining nor losing ground.
Rashid's forecast for the day ahead was measured: he expected the ringgit-dollar pair to trade in a range between 3.95 and 3.97, a narrow band that reflected the underlying uncertainty. The market was waiting—for clarity on Iran, for signals from the Fed, for the next earnings report, for the next Trump statement. Until one of those pieces moved decisively, the ringgit would likely remain caught between the pull of regional strength and the weight of dollar caution.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
Uncertainties around Iran negotiations continue to dominate market sentiment, despite major equity bourses reaching record highs— Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid, Bank Muamalat Malaysia chief economist
There are conflicting signals. Iranian state news suggests negotiations are proceeding well, but US President Trump remains hostile, especially regarding control of the Strait of Hormuz— Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei The Star ↗
Economy & Finance