Researchers Keep Five Silicon Qubits Near 99.9% Accuracy by Taming a Hidden Phase-Shift Error

Five qubits, one shared microwave line, and accuracy holding near 99.9%
RIKEN researchers ran five silicon spin qubits simultaneously on a shared control line with high accuracy.
Mark

Five qubits doesn't sound like many. Why is this a big deal?

Mimi

Because of how they were run. All five shared one microwave control line and operated simultaneously, and accuracy still stayed around 99.9%. The count is small, but the approach is what's meant to scale.

Mark

What was going wrong before?

Mimi

The AC Stark shift. The microwave signals change a qubit's effective energy levels, which shifts the phase of its quantum state, and that gets worse when several qubits are driven together.

Mark

And the fix?

Mimi

Calibrating between pairs of qubits rather than every possible combination. That keeps the workload manageable as devices get bigger.

Luke

Worth noting that five qubits is the extent of what was demonstrated. The source says the method is more practical for larger systems, but it doesn't show it working on larger ones.

Mark

So the headline number is a bit of a mixed picture?

Mimi

Yes. Individually, qubits were well above 99.99%, with the best near 99.999%. Up to three at once stayed above 99.99%. Five at once dropped to about 99.9%.

Luke

And the researchers say that's approaching what fault-tolerant computing needs, not that it meets it. Whether this holds with more qubits is unknown.

Mark

What causes the remaining loss?

Mimi

Drive-induced decoherence, from the extra microwave power needed to run several qubits. It's a different problem from the phase shifts, and the calibration doesn't fix it.

Luke

Camenzind says device design improvements could help, but that's an expectation, not a result.

  • Five silicon qubits sharing one microwave line began to interfere with each other as soon as they ran in parallel.
  • The AC Stark shift quietly bent each qubit's phase, threatening to unravel the precision that quantum operations demand.
  • A pairwise calibration method now corrects these shifts without requiring a separate procedure for every possible qubit combination.
  • Accuracy holds near 99.9 percent with all five running together, though drive-induced decoherence still leaves a stubborn residue of error.
  • The result points toward shared control lines as a practical path to scaling, with device design improvements the next frontier.

In a silicon chip no larger than a fingernail, five electron spins now answer to a single shared microwave line and still hold their quantum states with about 99.9 percent accuracy. Quantum computing has long hoped to scale by weaving many such bits together, yet each added qubit has tended to disturb its neighbors through subtle shifts in phase. Researchers at RIKEN and their collaborators have shown that these disturbances can be measured and corrected pair by pair, without an impossible catalogue of calibrations, and what remains is a quieter error that comes from simply driving the system harder. It is a modest but meaningful step toward machines that might one day solve problems no classical computer can.

Five silicon qubits, all fed by one shared microwave control line, have been run simultaneously while holding accuracy near 99.9 percent. The result, reported in Nature Physics by researchers at RIKEN and their collaborators, tackles a problem that has blocked the path to larger silicon quantum processors.

The qubits store information in the spin of single electrons confined in silicon. Unlike ordinary bits, they can exist in combinations of 0 and 1, and their reliability depends on precise microwave control. The difficulty is that driving several at once causes unwanted effects. The team traced much of this to the AC Stark shift, which alters a qubit's phase during control and matters most when many are operated together.

Their answer was a calibration method that works between pairs of qubits, so it does not need a separate procedure for every combination. Yi-Hsien Wu, the first author, carried out the experiments during his PhD. Paired with an improved device design and refined microwave pulses, the approach kept single-qubit fidelity above 99.99 percent, approaching 99.999 percent at best, and held roughly 99.9 percent when all five ran at once.

The method does not erase every error. What remains comes from drive-induced decoherence, caused by the extra microwave power needed for simultaneous operation. Leon Camenzind, who supervised the work, called it a limitation that better device design could help mitigate.

The broader stakes concern architecture. Giving each qubit its own control system would become unmanageable as devices grow, while shared lines offer a more practical route. Combined with silicon's compatibility with established semiconductor manufacturing, this could help build larger processors. The longer aim, as Seigo Tarucha of JST's Moonshot Goal 6 project put it, is a fault-tolerant silicon quantum computer, and reliable parallel control is an essential step toward it. The question now is whether design changes can reduce the decoherence that remains.

A row of five silicon qubits, all fed by a single shared microwave control line, has been run at the same time while holding accuracy near 99.9%. That result, reported in Nature Physics by researchers at the RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science and their collaborators, addresses a problem that has stood in the way of building bigger silicon quantum processors.

The qubits in question store information in the spin of individual electrons confined within silicon. Unlike the bits in a conventional computer, which are either 0 or 1, a qubit can exist in combinations of both states. Reliable calculation depends on extremely precise control of those spins, and microwave signals provide that control. The trouble is that driving several qubits at once can produce unwanted effects that degrade accuracy.

The team traced much of the problem to the AC Stark shift. When a microwave control signal alters a qubit's effective energy levels, the phase of its quantum state changes. Those phase shifts can disrupt the intended operation of individual qubits, and the effect matters most when several are being controlled together.

Their answer was a calibration method that compensates for the shifts. Calibrating every possible combination of qubits separately would quickly become unmanageable as devices grow. Instead, the technique relies on calibrations between pairs of qubits. Yi-Hsien Wu, the first author, who carried out the experiments during his PhD research, said the method avoids needing an entirely separate procedure for each combination.

The researchers paired the calibration with an improved device design and carefully adjusted microwave pulses. Tested one at a time, each of the five qubits achieved single-qubit gate fidelity well above 99.99%, and the best approached 99.999%. Fidelity describes how closely a quantum operation matches its intended result. With up to three qubits running simultaneously, fidelity stayed above 99.99%. With all five controlled at once, it held at roughly 99.9%, which the researchers describe as approaching the levels needed for practical fault-tolerant quantum computing.

The method did not remove errors entirely. The remaining loss of accuracy was linked to drive-induced decoherence, caused by the greater microwave power needed to operate multiple qubits at once. This differs from the phase shifts the new technique corrects: decoherence is the loss of the delicate quantum coherence that reliable operations require. Leon Camenzind, a RIKEN research scientist and co-first author who supervised the experiments, called it a limitation but said further improvements to device design could help mitigate it.

The stakes are about architecture. Giving every qubit its own independent control system would make increasingly complex devices hard to manage, whereas shared control lines could offer a more practical route to expansion. Camenzind said the study supports shared lines as a practical approach to scaling, and that, combined with silicon's compatibility with established semiconductor manufacturing, it could help pave the way toward larger processors capable of more complex computations.

The longer goal is a fault-tolerant quantum computer, one that calculates reliably despite the errors and disturbances that affect quantum systems. Seigo Tarucha, project manager of a silicon quantum computing project under JST's Moonshot Goal 6, said that goal is to build such a machine from silicon spin qubits, and that reliable parallel control is an essential step. The next thing to watch is whether device design changes can bring down drive-induced decoherence, the error that remains.

This is a limitation, but further improvements to device design could help mitigate this source of error.
— Leon Camenzind, RIKEN research scientist and co-first author
Our long-term goal is to build a fault-tolerant quantum computer based on silicon spin qubits, and reliable parallel control is an essential step toward that goal.
— Seigo Tarucha, project manager, JST Moonshot Goal 6 silicon quantum computing project
Contact Us FAQ