Reform UK secures £72m in two days as crypto donors fuel donation debate

A start-up party needs more money than membership fees alone
Harborne's explanation for why Reform required such extraordinary funding to compete with established parties.
Mark

So two people gave Reform UK £72 million in two days. That's more than every party raised last year combined. How is that even legal?

Mimi

It's legal because there are currently no caps on donations from UK-based donors. The government has capped donations from British expats at £100,000 and plans to do the same for recent returnees, but Delo and Harborne are both UK-based now, so those rules don't apply to them.

Luke

Wait—Delo moved back from Hong Kong in April. Is he technically a "recent returnee"? The source says the government plans to introduce a cap for those people, but it doesn't say whether that's already law or still pending.

Mimi

Good catch. The source says the government "plans to introduce" it, so it sounds like it hasn't happened yet. That's why these donations are legal right now.

Mark

And both donors are crypto investors. Delo got a pardon from Trump for anti-money laundering violations. Harborne is Thailand-based. Does that matter?

Luke

It matters contextually, but the source doesn't establish any wrongdoing by either man in these specific donations. Delo's pardon was about BitMEX in the past. Harborne's location is just stated as fact. The real scrutiny is about whether the donations themselves broke electoral law—and that's what police are investigating.

Mimi

Right. The Channel 4 investigation showed Reform aides discussing ways around electoral law for foreign donations. That's separate from these two donations, which are from UK-based donors.

Mark

So what's the actual threat people are worried about?

Mimi

The sheer scale. Seventy-two million pounds lets Reform hire 400 campaign managers and build policy infrastructure that other parties can't match. It's not about legality—it's about whether one party having that much more money than others creates an unequal playing field.

Luke

Though Farage and Delo both argue the opposite—that these donations level the playing field because Reform doesn't have the institutional resources of Labour or the Conservatives. That's their stated rationale.

Mark

And what's actually happening with regulation?

Mimi

Labour proposed a £100,000 annual cap in an amendment to the Representation of the People Bill. The Greens want £500,000. The Lib Dems want emergency legislation. But the government said it would set up a task force instead, so the amendment was never debated.

Luke

The bill goes to the House of Lords on Monday, so there's still a chance for debate there. But as of now, no cap has passed into law.

  • Two crypto investors handed Reform UK £36 million each within 48 hours, a sum that eclipses the entire annual fundraising of British politics combined.
  • Reform's leadership moved immediately to convert the windfall into infrastructure — 400 campaign managers, policy teams, and social media operations — framing it as levelling a tilted playing field.
  • One donation was deliberately structured as an upfront lump sum to outrun anticipated legislation, a manoeuvre that has deepened suspicions about the party's relationship with democratic norms.
  • The donations land against a backdrop of active police investigations, a parliamentary standards inquiry into Farage, and footage of senior aides apparently discussing ways to circumvent electoral law.
  • Opposition parties and transparency advocates are now demanding emergency legislation, with proposed caps ranging from £100,000 to £500,000 per year, warning that democracy itself is under acute financial threat.

In the span of a single weekend, two cryptocurrency investors handed Reform UK a combined £72 million — more than every British political party raised together in the previous year — reshaping the financial landscape of British democracy in ways the existing rules were never designed to contain. The donations, each £36 million, arrived from men who framed their giving as a corrective to institutional advantage, yet critics see in them the very concentration of private power that democratic systems were built to resist. The moment has forced an old and unresolved question back to the surface: in a democracy, how much should wealth be permitted to speak?

In forty-eight hours last weekend, Reform UK received two donations of £36 million each from cryptocurrency investors Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne — a combined £72 million that exceeded the total raised by all British political parties across the whole of 2025. Both men announced their gifts through opinion pieces in the Telegraph, framing them as investments in a party they believed could address Britain's deeper troubles. Harborne, already a significant Reform donor, argued that a start-up party without centuries of institutional patronage needed exceptional funding to compete. Delo made a similar case, adding that his donation was structured as an upfront payment specifically so that future Labour legislation could not prevent it — with spending planned over two to three years.

Reform's leadership welcomed the money as a democratic equaliser. Nigel Farage said it would allow the party to contest the next general election on a level playing field, while deputy leader Richard Tice outlined plans to hire up to 400 campaign managers and recruit specialists in policy, social media, and campaign strategy. The party insisted the funding would strengthen rather than corrode democratic participation.

The reaction elsewhere was swift and sharp. Labour's Bridget Phillipson accused Reform of being mired in sleaze and demanded answers, while the Liberal Democrats called for emergency legislation, describing the situation as a clear and present threat to democracy. The Greens proposed a £500,000 annual cap; Labour backbenchers had already tabled an amendment capping donations at £100,000, though it was never debated. Transparency International called the moment a watershed and said the case for an annual cap was now irrefutable.

The donations arrived amid a cluster of existing controversies. Farage faces a parliamentary standards investigation over an earlier £5 million gift from Harborne. Police are examining separate allegations about foreign donation schemes and other financial arrangements connected to the party. Delo himself received a presidential pardon from Donald Trump in 2024 following a guilty plea over anti-money laundering violations at his crypto exchange BitMEX. Together, the circumstances have made Reform's sudden financial dominance one of the most contested moments in recent British political history.

In the span of forty-eight hours, Reform UK received two donations of £36 million each from cryptocurrency investors, a combined sum that exceeded the total amount raised by every political party in Britain over the previous year. The first came late Friday from Ben Delo, a crypto trader who had recently relocated to Britain from Hong Kong. The second arrived Saturday from Christopher Harborne, a Thailand-based investor who had already given millions to Reform and its leader Nigel Farage. Both men announced their gifts through opinion pieces in the Telegraph, framing their contributions as investments in a party they believed could address what they saw as Britain's serious troubles.

The £72 million represents the largest donations ever recorded to a UK political party since disclosure requirements began in 2001. For context, in 2025, nine donations of £1 million or more went to political parties across the country. Reform received five of them, including Harborne's £9 million gift that year. Labour received five such donations totaling nearly £10 million. The Conservatives received three. The two new donations dwarf this landscape entirely.

Reform's leadership framed the money as a democratic equalizer. Party leader Nigel Farage said the donations would allow the party to "fight and win the next general election on a level playing field." A spokesman announced the party would now hire up to 400 campaign managers across target constituencies and employ what the party described as "the brightest and best minds" to develop policy. Deputy leader Richard Tice told BBC Radio 4 that the funding would enable Reform to focus on hiring skilled staff in social media, policy, and campaign management—work he characterized as beneficial to democracy rather than corrosive to it. Tice also revealed that Delo's donation was structured as an upfront payment specifically so that "the Labour Party can't legislate against it," with spending planned over two to three years.

Harborne's justification in print emphasized the structural disadvantage facing newer parties. He noted he had accumulated sufficient personal wealth and that Reform, as a "start-up party," lacked "the benefit of hundreds of years of patronage" that established parties enjoyed. A start-up party, he argued, needed more money than membership fees could provide to build itself and prepare for government. Delo made a similar point, saying Reform should spend less time raising funds to compete on equal terms and more time preparing to govern. Both men insisted they expected nothing personal in return.

The donations immediately triggered scrutiny and calls for reform. The Labour government has already introduced a £100,000 cap on donations from British citizens living overseas and plans a similar cap for those who recently returned to the UK—a measure that would have applied to Delo. Labour's party chairwoman Bridget Phillipson said Reform and Farage had "serious questions" to answer and accused them of being "drowning" in "sleaze and scandal." She demanded they "come clean" and cooperate with ongoing police investigations.

Other opposition parties escalated their demands for legislative action. The Green Party's deputy leader Rachel Millward called the donations "absolutely staggering amounts" and expressed frustration with the influence of extreme wealth in politics. She proposed a £500,000 annual cap on individual donations. The Liberal Democrats' Cabinet Office spokeswoman Lisa Smart called the sums "eye-watering" and urged the government to introduce emergency legislation to cap donations, describing the situation as "a real emergency for our democracy" and "a very clear and present threat."

Labour MP Stella Creasy and other backbenchers had already proposed an amendment to the Government's Representation of the People Bill that would cap donations at £100,000 per year, but the amendment was never debated after the government said it would establish a task force to investigate the issue. Duncan Hames, director of policy at Transparency International UK, called the moment a "watershed" and said the situation was "now completely out of control," making "an irrefutable case" for an annual cap on political donations.

The donations also arrived amid existing controversies surrounding Reform's finances. Farage is under investigation by the parliamentary standards commissioner over whether he should have declared a £5 million cash gift from Harborne ahead of the 2024 election. Farage has argued the gift was "purely private" and unrelated to his parliamentary or political activities. Last week, Channel 4 News broadcast footage of two senior Reform aides apparently discussing ways to circumvent electoral law to secure foreign party donations. The Metropolitan Police is investigating that matter, and the party denies wrongdoing. Police are also examining donations given to Reform by Fiona Cottrell, mother of a Farage ally, and a company controlled by Tice. Delo himself received an unconditional pardon from US President Donald Trump in 2024 over a breach of anti-money laundering laws at his crypto trading platform BitMEX, to which he had pleaded guilty in 2022.

A start-up party needs more money than can be provided by membership fees alone, to build and sustain itself and be ready for government.
— Christopher Harborne, in written statement
This is a watershed moment, with two billionaires pledging £72m to one political party in less than 48 hours. This situation is now completely out of control.
— Duncan Hames, Transparency International UK
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur BBC News ↗
Nous contacter FAQ