In the quiet farmland near Piddington in Oxfordshire, a decision has been made about a former Ministry of Defence storage site that has become a place where a national argument about who is housed, where, and at whose cost now meets a village's sense of being overlooked. The communities secretary has granted planning permission for temporary asylum use of the site, a step that shapes the ground without yet committing the state to walk onto it. Residents who feel they were not consulted have answered with a symbolic vote and a legal challenge, the oldest tools a community has when power seems t
Rayner Approves Planning Permission for Piddington Asylum Site Despite Local Opposition
Up to 1,256 asylum seekers, some detained, would be housed at the site, with local residents strongly opposed to the plans.
A village of a few hundred, and a site for 1,256 people
Mark
Rayner has approved planning permission. So is the Piddington site going ahead?
Mimi
Not yet, not formally. Planning permission lets the Home Office keep progressing the plan, but its spokesperson says a final decision to proceed has not been taken.
Mark
What did the village itself say?
Mimi
In September, 285 people voted to leave the UK in a symbolic referendum and 26 voted against. It was organised by campaigners to show opposition to housing 1,256 people at the site.
Luke
Worth being careful there. It was a campaigner-organised protest poll, not an official vote. We know the tally, but not the turnout as a share of residents.
Mark
And the legal fight?
Mimi
Wrong Plan Wrong Site went to the High Court last month seeking a judicial review. They dispute the August decision that no environmental assessment was needed, citing credible concerns about significant environmental effects.
Luke
Those concerns are the group's claim. The reporting doesn't say what a court would find, or whether the challenge has been accepted.
Mark
What does the government say it's doing?
Mimi
It says it's closing asylum hotels, spreading accommodation more fairly, and using self-contained military sites with 24/7 security and CCTV. It also claims over £1bn saved since the election.
Luke
That saving is the Home Office's own figure, with no breakdown given. And the Conservative line that residents are overwhelmingly opposed is a political characterisation, though the referendum result points the same way.
Mark
So what's the next date that matters?
Mimi
The six-week window for a legal challenge to the permission.
The Pulse
- Planning permission for up to 1,256 asylum seekers has landed on a former MoD site near Piddington, and the village is already reeling.
- Residents answered with a September protest vote, and campaigners have taken the environmental assessment question to the High Court.
- A six-week window to challenge the permission is open, and every day of it carries the weight of a possible court fight.
- The Home Office has not yet committed to proceeding, leaving the village and the government suspended in an unresolved standoff.
- Political opponents accuse the government of ignoring local voices, while ministers insist the sites are needed to close hotels.
In the quiet farmland near Piddington in Oxfordshire, a decision has been made about a former Ministry of Defence storage site that has become a place where a national argument about who is housed, where, and at whose cost now meets a village's sense of being overlooked. The communities secretary has granted planning permission for temporary asylum use of the site, a step that shapes the ground without yet committing the state to walk onto it. Residents who feel they were not consulted have answered with a symbolic vote and a legal challenge, the oldest tools a community has when power seems to have decided before the conversation began. What happens next depends on whether the courts are asked to look again and whether the government chooses, in the end, to proceed.
Angela Rayner, the communities secretary, has granted full planning permission for an asylum centre on a former Ministry of Defence site near Piddington in Oxfordshire, close to the town of Bicester. The permission covers temporary, phased use of the former storage site. But planning consent is not the final word: the Home Office says it has not yet decided to proceed, and has only committed to continuing to progress the use of the site.
The plans would house 1,256 asylum seekers, some of them detained, in a village where opposition is strong. In September, residents held a symbolic referendum asking whether to leave the UK; 285 voted in favour and 26 against. It was a protest, a way of making feelings visible when the decision felt made elsewhere. Last month, a group called Wrong Plan Wrong Site took the matter to the High Court, challenging the government's August conclusion that no environmental assessment was needed.
The Home Office argues that a fairer national spread of accommodation is needed, that it is closing asylum hotels, and that former military sites offer self-contained housing with round-the-clock security. Opposition figures, led by shadow housing secretary Katie Lam, say the village has been told its voice counts for nothing. For now, the question is whether a legal challenge is lodged within six weeks, and whether the government decides to go ahead.
Angela Rayner, the communities secretary, has granted full planning permission for an asylum centre at a Ministry of Defence site near the village of Piddington in Oxfordshire. The decision clears the way for the refurbishment and redevelopment of a former barracks, known as MoD Bicester, which sits near the town of Bicester. The ministry describes the permission as covering the temporary, phased use of the former storage site.
Planning consent is not the last word. The Home Office says a final decision to proceed has not yet been taken. In a statement on Thursday, a spokesperson said the permission allows the department to continue progressing the use of the site, but stopped short of committing to it.
The plans would house 1,256 asylum seekers, some of them detained. Piddington's residents have made their objection plain. In September, campaigners organised a symbolic referendum in the village in which people were asked whether to leave the UK. The result was 285 in favour of independence and 26 against. The poll was a protest, a way for residents to show how they felt about accommodation planned on their doorstep.
The opposition has also moved into the courts. Last month, a group called Wrong Plan Wrong Site took its complaint to the High Court, seeking a judicial review of the Home Office proposals. At issue is an August government conclusion that no environmental assessment was needed for the development. The campaigners disputed that, saying there were credible concerns about potentially significant environmental effects.
The Home Office defends the broader approach. Its spokesperson said the government is working toward a fairer distribution of asylum accommodation across the country, and claimed more than £1bn in savings since the election. The department says it is closing all asylum hotels and moving people into alternatives, including former military sites, which it describes as self-contained, with round-the-clock security and CCTV intended to limit the effect on local communities. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government declined to say more, noting that the decision could face a legal challenge.
That window is now open: there are six weeks in which the permission can be challenged in court.
The political reaction came quickly. Katie Lam, the shadow housing secretary, said Rayner had told Piddington's people their voices counted for nothing, and described a village of a few hundred being asked to host 1,256 male migrants against the wishes of almost everyone living there. She also pointed to Andy Burnham, who said last summer that people in more affluent parts of the UK must play their part in housing asylum seekers, and argued that moving people from hotels to military bases was not the answer. Her position was that people should be removed as soon as they arrive.
MoD Bicester is one of several sites in play. In June the Home Office said it was exploring three former military locations: Bicester, MoD Barnham and MoD Linton-on-Ouse. The government is also seeking to extend two existing sites, Crowborough until 2030 and Wethersfield beyond 2027.
What to watch now is whether a legal challenge is filed within the six weeks, and whether the Home Office takes the final decision to go ahead.
Notable Quotes
Planning permission allows us to continue to progress the use of MoD Bicester. However, a final decision to proceed is yet to be taken.— Home Office spokesperson
Angela Rayner has told the people of Piddington that their voices count for nothing.— Katie Lam, shadow housing secretary
Want the full story?
Read the original at The Guardian ↗