Raj Thackeray and K Annamalai Trade Barbs Over 'Bombay' Remark and Mumbai's Identity

If I were to get scared of such threats, I would have remained in my native village
Annamalai answered a Saamna threat by saying he would still come to Mumbai.
Mark

Let's start simply. What did Annamalai actually say that set this off?

Mimi

On January 9, during campaign remarks, he said 'Bombay' was not a Maharashtrian city but an international one. Raj and Uddhav Thackeray took it as a slight on Mumbai's Maharashtrian identity.

Luke

Worth noting that's the reported gist. The piece doesn't give his exact words, so how the sentence was phrased in full is not something we can check here.

Mark

How did the Thackerays respond?

Mimi

Raj played a video of the remark at a rally and called Annamalai 'rasmalai'. Akhil Chitre of the Sena (UBT) shared it too, saying it showed the BJP wanted to separate Mumbai from Maharashtra.

Luke

That's Chitre's allegation. Nothing in the report offers evidence of such an intention; it's attributed, not established.

Mark

And the threat about cutting off his legs?

Mimi

Annamalai says it appeared in Saamna, the Sena (UBT) mouthpiece. He said he'd come to Mumbai anyway.

Luke

Again, that's his account of the Saamna piece. The report doesn't quote the paper's wording or say who wrote it.

Mark

Why does Fadnavis bring up 'Madras'?

Mimi

He's saying the 'Bombay' usage was a language slip from trying to speak Hindi, like his own mistake with Chennai, and not an insult.

Luke

That's his reading of Annamalai's intent. Annamalai himself didn't offer that explanation here; he defended the substance of the remark.

  • A single word, 'Bombay,' ignited a sharp row between Annamalai and the Thackeray cousins.
  • Saamna's threat to cut off his legs turned a political exchange into a personal menace.
  • Annamalai answered defiantly, vowing he would not be frightened out of Mumbai.
  • Fadnavis is working to cool tempers, calling the remark a language slip rather than an insult.
  • BJP Tamil voices stress coexistence, but the Maharashtrian identity question is still unsettled.

In a quarrel that began with a single word, a former Tamil Nadu BJP chief and Maharashtra's rival political families have found themselves at the old fault line of who a great city belongs to. Annamalai's insistence that Bombay is a world city, and that global stature does not erase the hands of the Marathi people who built it, echoes a familiar human tension between a place's universal character and its rooted community. Chief Minister Fadnavis has chosen to read the slip as a stumble of language rather than a wound, and Tamil leaders in Mumbai are urging coexistence. Whether the word fades or keeps resurfacing, the larger question of belonging seems set to outlive this particular week.

On Monday in Chennai, K Annamalai told reporters he would not be frightened out of Mumbai. He was answering a threat printed in Saamna, the Shiv Sena (UBT) mouthpiece, warning that his legs would be cut off if he returned to the city. "I will come to Mumbai. Do what you will," he said.

The quarrel began on January 9, when Annamalai called Bombay an international city rather than a Maharashtrian one. Raj Thackeray of the MNS and his cousin Uddhav took offence, and Raj played the clip at a rally, mocking Annamalai as 'rasmalai.' Annamalai pushed back, asking why such a minor figure merited a public assault, accusing the cousins of tarnishing Bal Thackeray's legacy, and arguing that calling a leader national does not strip him of his home identity.

Chief Minister Fadnavis tried to lower the heat, saying Mumbai's international status does not sever it from Maharashtra and blaming the word on an attempt to speak Hindi. Captain Tamil Selvan, the BJP's Tamil legislator in Mumbai, echoed that call, pointing to the large South Indian population and decades of peaceful coexistence.

The BJP is now stressing harmony, while the Thackerays keep pressing who Mumbai belongs to. That question seems likely to remain in public debate.

On Monday, in Chennai, K Annamalai told reporters he was not going to be frightened out of Mumbai. The former Tamil Nadu BJP president was answering a threat printed in Saamna, the mouthpiece of the Shiv Sena (UBT), which said his legs would be cut off if he entered the city again. "I will come to Mumbai. Do what you will," he said. If he scared that easily, he added, he would have stayed in his native village forever.

The row goes back to January 9, when Annamalai said during a campaign appearance that 'Bombay' was not a Maharashtrian city but an international one. The remark angered both Raj Thackeray, who heads the MNS, and his cousin Uddhav Thackeray, and it grew into a major political controversy.

Raj Thackeray then played a video of the statement at a rally. In that speech he referred to Annamalai as 'rasmalai'. Akhil Chitre of the Shiv Sena (UBT) also shared the video, alleging that the remark exposed what he called the BJP's real intention: to separate Mumbai from Maharashtra.

Annamalai questioned the scale of the reaction. He asked whether he had become so important a leader that Raj and Uddhav had to organise a public meeting to attack him, and demanded to know who they were to threaten him. He accused the cousins of damaging the legacy of Bal Thackeray, saying he held the Shiv Sena founder in great respect. The slogan Raj used at the rally, the report notes, was itself coined when Bal Thackeray led the Shiv Sena.

He also restated his original point and argued it carried no insult. If Prime Minister Narendra Modi is called a leader of India, he asked, does he stop being a Gujarati? If the late Congress chief minister Kamaraj is called a great national leader, does he stop being a Tamil? In the same way, he said, calling Mumbai a global capital does not mean it was not built by the hard work of Marathi brothers and sisters.

Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis tried to lower the temperature. Calling Mumbai an international city, he said, does not mean it does not belong to Maharashtra. He put Annamalai's use of 'Bombay' down to an attempt to speak Hindi. Fadnavis recalled that he had once been corrected after saying 'Madras' for Chennai in a speech, and described that as a genuine mistake, not an insult.

Captain Tamil Selvan, the BJP's only Tamil legislator in Mumbai, backed that line. He said Fadnavis had vastly improved Mumbai and made it like an international city, but that no one can take it away from Maharashtra. He noted that his constituency has 90,000 South Indians and that 13% of Mumbaikars are South Indians. Selvan condemned what he called an attempt to create fissures between Maharashtrians and Tamilians, saying the two communities have coexisted peacefully in Mumbai for decades. Tamilians, he added, respect and honour Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and the Bhonsale family, who have lived peacefully in Thanjavur for ages.

The BJP's Maharashtra leadership and its Tamil figures are now stressing coexistence, while the Thackerays continue to press the question of who Mumbai belongs to. That question looks set to stay in active political debate.

I will come to Mumbai. Do what you will.
— K Annamalai, to reporters in Chennai
No one can take it away from Maharashtra.
— Captain Tamil Selvan, BJP legislator
Fale Conosco FAQ