Quebec separatists poised for power as PQ surges on identity politics

They've hardened on these issues, and don't see themselves in the left's recent fixation on identity issues
A radio host explains why Quebecers are voting for the PQ despite its separatist platform.
Mark

So the PQ is going to win, but they're not actually winning on separatism. That seems like a contradiction.

Mimi

It is, but it's not uncommon in politics. The party's brand is independence, but the voters who are putting them in power are voting for their stance on immigration and religious symbols. Those are the issues that moved the needle.

Luke

But we should be careful here. The polls show 30 percent. That's not a majority. We don't know yet if they'll actually form government or what kind of government it will be.

Mimi

True. But the reporting is clear that they're the most likely outcome. The vote is split on the right, which helps them.

Mark

And Plamondon has basically said he won't hold the referendum while Trump is president. So he's defusing his own party's central promise.

Mimi

Exactly. He's using Trump as a shield. It lets him campaign on the issues that actually resonate—immigration, secularism—without having to defend the referendum that most Quebecers don't want.

Luke

The source says "an overwhelming majority" don't want a referendum. That's strong language. But we should note that's based on polling, not a vote. And polling can shift.

Mark

What about Carney? He seems to be the real obstacle here.

Mimi

He does. He's popular in Quebec specifically because he's standing up to Trump. As long as that threat feels real, Carney has a shield too.

Luke

And we don't know how long that lasts. If Trump's threat recedes, or if the trade war ends, Carney's advantage could evaporate.

Mark

So this is really a story about what happens next, not what's happening now.

Mimi

Exactly. The election is Monday. But the real story is what Plamondon does with power, and whether he can hold together a coalition that's united against immigration but divided on independence.

  • A separatist party is on the verge of reclaiming Quebec's government for the first time in over a decade, despite most voters actively opposing the independence referendum it has promised.
  • Party leader Plamondon has recast the PQ's appeal around immigration restrictions and bans on religious symbols in schools, trading the party's social-democratic heritage for the rhetoric of the hard right.
  • The referendum pledge remains a persistent liability — Quebecers, preoccupied with a trade war with the United States, have signalled they want national solidarity, not constitutional upheaval.
  • A fractured opposition, with the nationalist vote splitting four ways outside Montreal, is handing the PQ an advantage that its 30% polling share alone would not normally deliver.
  • A PQ government would almost certainly move to defund the lieutenant-governor's office and legislate the severing of ties with the monarchy, setting up an immediate collision with Ottawa and Prime Minister Carney.

Once again, Quebec stands at the threshold of a familiar crossroads — a people weighing the pull of sovereignty against the gravity of belonging. The Parti Québécois, long dormant from the halls of provincial power, appears poised to return not on the old dream of independence, but on a harder-edged politics of identity, immigration, and cultural anxiety. If Paul St-Pierre Plamondon leads his party to victory on Monday, the question will not simply be what Quebec wants to become, but whether a government can be built on grievance without eventually being consumed by it.

Quebec heads to the polls on Monday with the Parti Québécois positioned to return to power for the first time in more than a decade. A victory would send reverberations well beyond the province's borders — yet the party's resurgence rests on a platform that would have been unrecognisable to its founders.

Paul St-Pierre Plamondon, a 49-year-old Oxford-educated lawyer, has rebuilt the PQ not around the traditional case for sovereignty but around identity politics: blaming immigrants for overcrowded schools and housing shortages, pledging to slash immigration levels, and promising to ban conspicuous religious symbols worn by teachers and students. He has dismissed left-wing critics as "woke" and adopted the tone of hard-right commentators. Radio host Patrick Lagacé has noted that while Quebecers still identify broadly with the left, public opinion has hardened sharply on immigration and religious accommodation — a fracture between the province's self-image and its actual mood.

The one persistent drag on Plamondon's support is his promise to hold an independence referendum within his first term. Most Quebecers oppose it, especially while Canada is locked in a trade dispute with the United States. In last year's federal election, Quebec chose Liberal leader Mark Carney and his defiant stance toward Washington over the separatist Bloc Québécois — a clear statement of priorities. Plamondon has since retreated tactically, saying he would not hold a referendum while Trump remains in power, allowing him to steer the campaign back toward immigration.

The PQ's path to government is also eased by a fragmented opposition. Outside Montreal, the nationalist vote is splitting four ways, with the upstart Parti Conservateur du Québec making significant inroads near Quebec City. Analysts note that the PQ benefits less from its own strength than from its opponents' inability to consolidate around an alternative.

Should Plamondon form a government, he has already telegraphed confrontation with Ottawa — defunding the lieutenant-governor's office, legislating the end of Quebec's ties to the monarchy, and attacking Carney's immigration plans as an abuse of power. These moves echo the PQ's combative posture from the 1970s, and carry similar risks: Carney remains popular in Quebec, and as long as the American threat dominates the national conversation, the constitutional battles Plamondon wants to pick may find little appetite among the very voters who brought him to power.

Quebec voters are heading to the polls on Monday with the Parti Québécois positioned to return to power for the first time in more than a decade—a separatist party that has promised to hold a referendum on independence from Canada within two years. The province, home to roughly nine million people, has not elected a PQ government since the early 2010s, and a victory would reshape the political landscape in ways that extend far beyond Quebec's borders.

The party's resurgence rests almost entirely on the shoulders of Paul St-Pierre Plamondon, a 49-year-old Oxford-educated lawyer and polyglot who has positioned himself as a generational alternative to François Legault, Quebec's long-serving premier who stepped down earlier this year. Plamondon has become a fixture on TikTok and other platforms where younger voters congregate, but his electoral appeal has little to do with the traditional separatist argument. Polls show that most Quebecers do not actually support independence. Instead, Plamondon has built his campaign on identity politics of a different sort—blaming immigrants for overcrowded schools, rising crime, and housing shortages, while pledging to slash immigration levels and prohibit what he calls "conspicuous" religious symbols worn by teachers and students. He has dismissed critics from the left-leaning Quebec Solidaire party as "woke" and adopted the rhetorical style of hard-right columnists.

This represents a sharp departure from the PQ's historical roots in social democracy, yet it resonates with a significant portion of the electorate. Radio host Patrick Lagacé observed that while most Quebecers traditionally identify with the political left, they have hardened considerably on social questions—immigration, religious accommodation, systemic racism—and no longer see themselves reflected in what they perceive as the left's recent preoccupations. The shift reveals a fracture between Quebec's self-image as a progressive society and the actual drift of public opinion on these particular issues.

The one element that has consistently dragged on Plamondon's popularity is his repeated promise to hold a referendum during his first term as premier. An overwhelming majority of Quebecers oppose such a move, particularly given that Canada is currently locked in a trade war with the United States. In last year's federal election, Quebec voters chose Liberal leader Mark Carney and his "elbows up" stance against the Trump administration over the separatist Bloc Québécois, a clear signal of where the province's priorities lay. Plamondon initially said he would not hold a referendum while Trump remained in power, a tactical retreat that allowed him to shift the campaign's focus back to immigration and away from the constitutional question that most voters wanted to avoid.

The PQ has also benefited from a fragmented right-leaning vote. Beyond Montreal, which remains a reliable Liberal stronghold, the nationalist vote is splitting four ways, with the upstart Parti Conservateur du Québec making significant gains, particularly around Quebec City. Poll analyst Philippe Fournier noted that the PQ's advantage stems partly from the fact that voters opposed to the party cannot agree on an alternative. Current polling puts the PQ at roughly 30 percent—below the threshold typically needed for a majority government, leaving the shape and strength of any mandate uncertain.

If the PQ does form the next government, Plamondon has already signaled his intention to provoke confrontation with Ottawa. He has suggested defunding the office of Quebec's lieutenant-governor, the Crown's representative in the province, and promised legislation to sever Quebec's ties with the monarchy—a symbol that separatists have long viewed as emblematic of French-Canadian oppression. He has also attacked Prime Minister Carney's stated intention to increase immigration, calling it an "abuse of power" that would further damage French-language services in the province.

These moves carry an anachronistic quality, echoing the PQ's confrontational posture from the 1970s when the party was at its ideological height. They are also potentially risky. Carney remains popular in Quebec and is likely to maintain that support as long as the Trump threat looms large enough to dominate voters' concerns. The question facing Plamondon is whether he can sustain a government built on identity grievances while avoiding the constitutional crisis that most Quebecers have explicitly rejected.

Most Quebecers traditionally see themselves as being on the left. Increasingly, though, they are on the right when it comes to social issues like systemic racism and accommodation of religious behaviour.
— Patrick Lagacé, radio host
The Parti Québécois is benefiting from a massive vote split because those who don't like the PQ don't agree on who to vote for.
— Philippe Fournier, poll analyst
Contattaci Domande frequenti