Putin's Kuril Islands visit signals punishment for Japan's Ukraine support

Russia has made the islands a matter of constitutional law and nationalist pride.
Analysts explain why even a change in Russian leadership would not resolve Japan's territorial claims.
Mark

Why would Putin make this visit now, at this particular moment?

Mimi

The timing is the whole point. He visited just before the anniversary of Japan's surrender in World War II—the exact moment when the Soviets took the islands. It's a symbolic reassertion of control, and a message that Japan's support for Ukraine has consequences.

Mark

But Japan has wanted these islands back for eighty years. Why would this visit change anything?

Mimi

It doesn't change the territorial reality. What it does is foreclose the possibility of negotiation. Putin is signaling that Russia will not budge, and he's doing it in a way that strengthens his domestic standing while weakening Japan's Prime Minister politically.

Mark

Can Japan do anything about it?

Mimi

Not much. Japan depends on Russian energy, especially now. It's already imposed sanctions over Ukraine. Adding more would hurt Japan's own economy. Tokyo filed a protest, but that's largely symbolic.

Mark

What if Putin falls from power?

Mimi

Analysts don't think it matters. Russia amended its constitution in 2020 to ban ceding territory. That's not a Putin policy—it's now written into Russian law. Any successor would face the same constitutional barrier.

Mark

So this is permanent?

Mimi

For all practical purposes, yes. The diplomatic window that existed after the Soviet collapse has closed. Russia has made the islands a matter of constitutional law and nationalist pride. Japan's ambitions concerning the islands are effectively over.

  • Putin's first-ever landing on Iturup island, timed two days before Japan's WWII surrender anniversary, was read by analysts as a calculated provocation rather than a routine inspection.
  • Tokyo responded with immediate condemnation, but the diplomatic exchange — sharp words met with sharper words — revealed how little leverage Japan actually holds.
  • Russia's 2020 constitutional ban on ceding territory has legally sealed off any negotiated resolution, leaving Japan's decades-long claim with no viable path forward.
  • Japan's dependence on Russian energy and Prime Minister Takaichi's weakening poll numbers further constrain Tokyo's ability to respond with anything beyond formal protest.
  • Analysts warn the visit may be part of a coordinated pressure campaign involving China and North Korea, designed to test and undermine Takaichi's security credibility at home.

On the eve of Japan's World War II surrender anniversary, Vladimir Putin made his first visit to the disputed Kuril Islands, a chain of territory seized by Soviet forces in 1945 and claimed by Japan ever since. The gesture was less a diplomatic act than a geopolitical sermon — a deliberate reminder, delivered in stone and symbolism, that Russia holds what it holds, and that Japan's alignment with Ukraine and NATO carries a price. In a world where territory has become both shield and message, the visit signals not a new conflict but the quiet closing of an old door.

When Vladimir Putin stepped onto Iturup island last week — his first visit to any of the Kuril Islands — he was not simply touring a school or a hospital. He was delivering a message. The timing, two days before August 15, the anniversary of Japan's World War II surrender and the moment Soviet troops seized these islands from a defeated Japan, was understood by analysts as entirely deliberate. Tokyo's response was swift: Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi called the visit "absolutely unacceptable," while Russia's Foreign Ministry declared the islands an integral part of Russian territory. But beneath the diplomatic exchange lies a colder logic — according to analysts, Putin's visit was designed to punish Japan for its support of Ukraine and its deepening ties with NATO.

The dispute itself is nearly eighty years old. No peace treaty has ever been signed between Russia and Japan, and successive Japanese governments have maintained that the Soviet seizure was illegal. When the Soviet Union collapsed, Japan saw an opening, and former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe pursued negotiations with Putin more persistently than any of his predecessors. None of it yielded results. In 2020, Russia amended its constitution to explicitly forbid ceding any territory — a legal closure that ended what little diplomatic possibility remained.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 severed what was left of the relationship. Japan imposed sanctions alongside the West, but remains dependent on Russian energy, a vulnerability that limits its options. Analysts note that Prime Minister Takaichi's softening domestic poll numbers further reduce her room to maneuver, and suggest Putin may be coordinating with China and North Korea to compound pressure on her government.

For Japan, the conclusion drawn by experts is stark: the window for resolving this dispute has closed. Putin's visit to Iturup was not an overture — it was a declaration of possession. The islands are likely to remain in Russian hands, and barring a fundamental transformation of Russian politics or the global order, no future leader in Moscow would have reason to think otherwise.

Vladimir Putin stepped onto the island of Iturup last week, and in doing so, he delivered what analysts describe as a carefully calibrated insult to Japan. It was the Russian president's first-ever visit to one of the Kuril Islands, a chain of territory that sits in the waters between Russia and Japan, claimed by both nations and disputed for nearly eighty years. He toured a school, a hospital, industrial facilities. The timing was deliberate: the visit came just two days before August 15, the anniversary of Japan's surrender in World War II—the very moment when Soviet troops seized these islands from a defeated Japan, forcing 17,300 residents to abandon their homes over the following year.

Tokyo's response was immediate and sharp. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi called the visit "absolutely unacceptable" on social media, reasserting Japan's claim to what it calls the "Northern Territories." Russia's Foreign Ministry fired back, declaring the islands an "integral part" of Russian territory. But beneath the diplomatic volleys lies a deeper calculation. According to James Brown, a professor of international relations at Temple University's Tokyo campus, Putin's visit was a message—one aimed at punishing Japan for its unwavering support of Ukraine and its deepening ties with NATO members in Europe. "There is a clear desire to punish Japan," Brown told Deutsche Welle. Yet the move also serves a domestic purpose: it generates patriotic fervor among Russians across the political spectrum, a useful tool for any leader seeking to consolidate support.

The territorial dispute between Russia and Japan stretches back to the end of World War II, but it has never been resolved. No formal peace treaty exists between the two nations. For decades, successive Japanese governments have maintained that the Soviet seizure was illegal, a position that has poisoned bilateral relations. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Japan saw an opening. Economic hardship in Russia created an opportunity: perhaps Moscow could be persuaded to return the islands in exchange for financial aid or joint development agreements. Former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe pursued this possibility more aggressively than most, meeting repeatedly with Putin to make the case. None of it worked. In 2020, Russia amended its constitution to explicitly prohibit the ceding of any territory to a foreign power—a legal lock that effectively closed the door on negotiation.

Then came Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, and Japan's relationship with Moscow deteriorated sharply. Tokyo imposed sanctions alongside the West. Yet Japan remains dependent on Russian energy, a vulnerability that has only deepened given tensions with Iran. This dependency constrains Tokyo's options. Toshimitsu Shigemura, a professor of politics at Waseda University, told Deutsche Welle that Japan has already summoned the Russian ambassador and filed a formal protest, but adding new sanctions would be difficult given the energy situation. "Japan is in a relatively weak position," Shigemura said.

Analysts believe Putin's move is also a test of Prime Minister Takaichi herself. Her domestic poll numbers are softening, and Putin likely calculates that she lacks the political capital to respond with anything more forceful than words. Shigemura suggests that Putin may be coordinating with China and North Korea to weaken Takaichi's standing on security issues—a coordinated pressure campaign against a leader who has taken a firm line in the region. More broadly, Shigemura argues that Russia's revised constitution and the nationalist sentiment cultivated by state propaganda have made the return of the islands "impossible." Even if Putin were to fall from power tomorrow, a successor would have no incentive to reverse course. Brown agrees: the islands were not returned during the Soviet collapse or the economic chaos that followed, and there is no reason to believe any future Russian leader would entertain the idea.

For Japan, the window for resolving this dispute has effectively closed. Putin's visit to Iturup was not a negotiating overture. It was a statement of possession, a reminder that Russia holds the territory and intends to keep it, and a signal that Japan's support for Ukraine comes with a cost. Tokyo has few levers to pull and limited room to maneuver. The islands remain in Russian hands, and barring a seismic shift in Russian politics or a fundamental change in the global order, they are likely to stay there.

This was clearly a message to Japan. Russia has been angered by Japan's support for Ukraine and for the closer ties that Tokyo has been building with European members of NATO.
— James Brown, professor of international relations at Temple University
Japan is importing Russian energy and, because of the situation with Iran, that has become even more important, which leaves Tokyo in a relatively weak position.
— Toshimitsu Shigemura, professor of politics at Waseda University
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei Deutsche Welle ↗
Kontakt FAQ