Putin meets Dilma as BRICS foreign ministers gather amid Middle East tensions

The fact that they're meeting is positive, and we hope it leads to a way forward.
A former Indian diplomat on BRICS' chances of producing a unified statement despite deep divisions over Middle East conflict.

BRICS foreign ministers convene in New Delhi to forge unified position despite member divisions over Iran-UAE-Saudi tensions in Middle East conflict. Expanded BRICS bloc now includes 10 nations with competing interests; Iran seeks condemnation of US-Israel actions while UAE and Saudi Arabia oppose Iranian positions.

  • BRICS foreign ministers convene in New Delhi on May 14-15, 2026
  • The bloc has expanded from 5 to 10 members, including Iran and UAE on opposite sides of Middle East conflict
  • Iran seeks BRICS condemnation of US-Israel actions; UAE and Saudi Arabia oppose this position
  • China sending ambassador instead of foreign minister due to Trump's visit to Beijing

Putin met with ex-Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff, head of BRICS' development bank, as the bloc prepares foreign minister talks in New Delhi amid divisions over Middle East conflicts.

Vladimir Putin sat down with Dilma Rousseff at the Kremlin on Wednesday to discuss the machinery of BRICS—the bloc of emerging economies that has grown from an informal club into a genuine geopolitical force. Rousseff, who once led Brazil, now runs the New Development Bank, the financial institution the five founding members created in 2015 to offer an alternative to Western-dominated lending. She was not alone in the room. Roman Serov, the bank's vice president, was there. So were Maxim Oreshkin from Putin's office and Anton Siluanov, Russia's finance minister. The meeting was a small ceremony of alignment, a chance for Moscow to coordinate before the real test began.

That test arrives Thursday in New Delhi, where the foreign ministers of BRICS will gather to do something that has become increasingly difficult: agree on anything. The bloc started in 2009 as Russia's idea—a platform for countries tired of American dominance to speak with one voice. For years it was just five: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. But it has swollen. Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates have all joined. Ten nations now, each with its own interests, its own enemies, its own survival to think about.

The problem is immediate and acute. Iran has asked India, which holds the BRICS presidency this year, to use the bloc to condemn American and Israeli actions in the Middle East. But the UAE and Saudi Arabia—both now BRICS members—are on the opposite side of that conflict. They have reportedly launched military strikes against Iran in retaliation for Iranian attacks. The war that began on February 28 has divided the bloc along lines that no diplomatic formula can easily erase. Energy prices have spiked across the region. India itself has had to introduce emergency measures to shield its economy and its people from the shock.

India's foreign ministry spokesman, Randhir Jaiswal, acknowledged the reality in March: some BRICS members are directly involved in the fighting, which makes building consensus "difficult." Yet India is hoping. Officials told Reuters they believe a joint statement is still possible after these meetings. Manjeev Singh Puri, a former Indian diplomat, offered a measured optimism. "It's good that the foreign ministers of all BRICS countries except China are arriving," he said. China will send its ambassador instead—Wang Yi, the foreign minister, cannot travel because Donald Trump is visiting Beijing this week. "The fact that they're meeting is positive," Puri continued, "and we hope it leads to a way forward."

But the arithmetic is grim. China has chosen nominal neutrality, bound as it is to both Iran and the Arab states. Russia, under sanctions and isolated from the West, has its own reasons to align with Iran. The UAE and Saudi Arabia have their own security calculations. India, caught in the middle, must somehow forge language that all ten can sign. The energy crisis is real. The divisions are real. The hope, fragile as it is, rests on the simple fact that they are showing up to talk at all.

Some members of BRICS are directly involved in the conflict, which makes forming consensus difficult.
— Randhir Jaiswal, Indian Foreign Ministry spokesman
The fact that they're meeting is positive, and we hope it leads to a way forward.
— Manjeev Singh Puri, former Indian diplomat
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why does it matter that Dilma met with Putin before the foreign ministers convene?

Model

It's a signal. When the head of BRICS' development bank sits down with Russia's president just before a contentious meeting, it's coordination. They're aligning on what they want to say and do.

Inventor

But BRICS is supposed to be a bloc of equals. Doesn't that look like Russia pulling strings?

Model

It does, and that's part of the tension. Russia founded BRICS, but it's also isolated by sanctions. It needs the bloc more than the bloc needs Russia right now. The meeting is as much about Russia reassuring itself that it still has influence.

Inventor

What's the actual problem they're trying to solve in New Delhi?

Model

Getting ten countries with conflicting interests to sign one statement. Iran wants BRICS to condemn America and Israel. The UAE and Saudi Arabia—both now members—are fighting Iran. They won't sign anything that looks like they're siding against their own military operations.

Inventor

So they'll fail to produce a statement?

Model

Maybe not. India's officials are hopeful. But hope and reality are different things. The energy crisis is real. Countries are hurting. That might force them to find common ground, or it might make them more defensive about their own interests.

Inventor

What about China?

Model

China is sending its ambassador instead of its foreign minister because Trump is in Beijing. That's telling. China is hedging. It has relationships with both Iran and the Arab states. It's not going to risk either one by taking a strong position.

Inventor

So India is alone in trying to make this work?

Model

Essentially, yes. India holds the presidency. The success or failure of this meeting is India's responsibility. And India is already feeling the economic pain from the conflict—energy prices, supply chain disruptions. They need BRICS to function, but they're the ones who have to make it happen.

Contact Us FAQ