After fourteen hours of face-to-face negotiation in Islamabad, American and Iranian delegations parted without agreement, leaving a two-week ceasefire that began on April 8 hanging by a thread. The disputes that resisted resolution are the old and deep ones: how far Iran's nuclear work may go, who moves through the Strait of Hormuz and on what terms, and the unresolved war in Lebanon. As is often the case when two adversaries cannot yet speak their way to peace, a third power has stepped forward offering to carry messages, and whether that offer finds a willing hand remains an open question fo
Putin Offers Mediation After US-Iran Islamabad Talks Collapse Without Agreement
Fourteen hours across a table, and the differences remained
Mark
Fourteen hours of talks and no deal. Why does that matter so much right now?
Mimi
Because the ceasefire that began April 8 is described as a two-week arrangement. The Islamabad meeting was the first face-to-face effort to firm it up, and it ended without agreement.
Mark
What exactly were they stuck on?
Mimi
According to Vance, three things: Iran's nuclear program, movement through the Strait of Hormuz, and the conflict in Lebanon.
Luke
Worth noting that's Vance's account. We don't have Iran's own description of where the talks broke down.
Mark
Then Putin enters. What did he actually offer?
Mimi
In a call with Pezeshkian, he said he was ready to facilitate a political and diplomatic settlement and to mediate toward a lasting peace, per the Kremlin's readout.
Luke
That's an offer, not a mediation. There's no report that Washington or Tehran has accepted it, or that the US was even consulted.
Mark
And Pezeshkian's side of the call?
Mimi
Iranian media quote him saying Iran is ready for a balanced and fair agreement guaranteeing lasting peace and security.
Luke
Again, that's Iranian media relaying him. And phrases like balanced and fair don't tell us what Iran would concede on enrichment or Hormuz.
Mark
Where does Netanyahu fit?
Mimi
He says Israel's military action stopped Iran from becoming nuclear-armed, and he alleges Iranian backing of Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis.
Luke
Those are assertions in a video message. The reporting doesn't offer independent confirmation of either claim.
Il Polso
- A ceasefire measured in weeks is now running down while the two sides failed to find common ground after an exhausting 14-hour session.
- Nuclear work, shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, and fighting in Lebanon remain deadlocked, each one a potential spark.
- Moscow has moved quickly, with Putin offering to mediate and Iran's president signaling openness to a balanced deal.
- Israel's prime minister insists earlier military action stopped an Iranian bomb, and that framing will shape how any mediation is received.
After fourteen hours of face-to-face negotiation in Islamabad, American and Iranian delegations parted without agreement, leaving a two-week ceasefire that began on April 8 hanging by a thread. The disputes that resisted resolution are the old and deep ones: how far Iran's nuclear work may go, who moves through the Strait of Hormuz and on what terms, and the unresolved war in Lebanon. As is often the case when two adversaries cannot yet speak their way to peace, a third power has stepped forward offering to carry messages, and whether that offer finds a willing hand remains an open question for the coming days.
The talks in Islamabad lasted fourteen hours and ran into Saturday night, but they ended without a deal. Delegations from Washington and Tehran had sat face to face in Pakistan's capital, hoping to turn a fragile ceasefire into something more lasting. They left with their differences still intact.
The American team was led by Vice President JD Vance, joined by envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. Iran sent Parliament Speaker Mohammad Ghalibaf together with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. The war between the two countries began on February 28, and a ceasefire took effect on April 8. It was framed as a two-week arrangement, which gave the Islamabad meeting its urgency. Vance named three sticking points: Iran's nuclear program, the movement of ships through the Strait of Hormuz, and the conflict in Lebanon.
Hours later, Russian President Vladimir Putin telephoned Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. The Kremlin said Putin pledged to help find a political and diplomatic settlement and offered to mediate toward a just and lasting peace. Pezeshkian, according to Iranian media, replied that Tehran wants peace and is ready for a balanced, fair agreement with the United States that secures lasting stability.
In a video message, Benjamin Netanyahu argued that without Israel's military action Iran would already possess a nuclear weapon, and he accused Tehran of backing Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis. The reporting does not reveal the specific proposals exchanged in Islamabad, nor whether either side has accepted Russia's offer. What remains clear is that the ceasefire is short, the first direct talks produced no agreement, and a new intermediary has volunteered. Whether that mediation can bridge gaps this wide on nuclear and regional questions is still unknown.
The talks in Islamabad ran for 14 hours, continuing late into Saturday night, and ended without a deal. Delegations from the United States and Iran had sat down face to face in Pakistan's capital to try to turn a fragile ceasefire into something more durable. They left with their differences intact.
The American side was led by Vice President JD Vance. With him were Steve Witkoff, a special envoy for Donald Trump, and Jared Kushner, the president's son-in-law. Iran sent Parliament Speaker Mohammad Ghalibaf, accompanied by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.
The context is a war that began on February 28 between Iran and the United States. A ceasefire took effect on April 8, and it is described as a two-week arrangement, which gives the Islamabad session its urgency. According to Vance, the sticking points were Iran's nuclear program, the movement of ships through the Strait of Hormuz, and the conflict in Lebanon. The failure of the meeting has raised doubts about whether the truce can hold.
Within hours, a new voice entered. Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke by phone with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and, according to the Kremlin's readout of the call, stressed his readiness to help in the search for a political and diplomatic settlement. The Kremlin said he offered to mediate efforts toward what it called a just and lasting peace in the Middle East.
Pezeshkian, according to Iranian media, used the call to say that Iran wants peace. He said Tehran is prepared for a balanced and fair agreement with the United States, one that guarantees lasting peace and security. Both accounts of the call come from the parties' own channels: the Kremlin's readout and Iranian media reports.
Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, offered a different framing in a video message. He claimed that had Israel not taken military action, Iran would already be a nuclear-armed state. He also alleged that Iran has supported Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis. These are his claims, made as the diplomacy stalled.
What the reporting does not show is any detail of the specific proposals exchanged in Islamabad, or how far apart the two delegations ended up on each of the three disputed issues. It also does not say whether either side has accepted Russia's offer. What is on the record is that the ceasefire is short, the first direct talks produced no agreement, and a third power has put itself forward as a go-between. Whether Moscow's offer finds takers will depend on positions that, after 14 hours across a table, remain sharply divided over nuclear and regional questions.
Citazioni salienti
Putin stressed his readiness to facilitate a political and diplomatic settlement and to mediate toward a just and lasting peace in the Middle East.— Kremlin readout of call with Pezeshkian
Iran is prepared for a balanced and fair agreement that guarantees lasting peace and security.— Masoud Pezeshkian, per Iranian media
Vuoi la storia completa?
Leggi l'originale su India.com ↗
Politics & Governance