In England, the government has decided that the school day should be one in which children do not carry their phones at all, moving beyond the familiar habit of keeping a device out of sight but within reach. The change, due from September 2027, asks schools to take on a more demanding kind of care for childhood attention and friendship, and it arrives at a moment when the people who must carry it out are asking who will pay for the lockers and pouches it requires. Across the nations of the United Kingdom, each place is answering the same question in its own way, as education is held separatel
Pupils in England to be barred from carrying phones at all during the school day under stricter guidance
School is for learning and friendship, not scrolling
What actually changes for a pupil in England?
Under the current rules, a phone can sit in a bag if nobody sees or hears it. From September 2027 the phone can't be on them at all during the school day.
So the June guidance wasn't enough?
It made schools legally responsible for a phone-free day, but the government says the stricter version goes beyond "no see, no hear" policies. Campaigners like Charlotte Ashton say those weren't working.
That's her view, though. The reporting doesn't give any data on how well "no see, no hear" works.
Fair. It's an argument from a campaigner, not a measured result.
And the unions' objection is money?
Yes. Pepe Di'Iasio said pouches or secure storage for every pupil would be very costly and not feasible without funding.
Notably, he said "if" schools are expected to provide that. Schools choose their own method, and some already use pouches, lockers or collection. No cost figure is given anywhere.
Is this the same as the social media ban?
No, that's separate. It's due in March and covers platforms like Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok.
And Vinted and eBay are only a possibility, according to the culture secretary. That isn't settled.
O Pulso
- The government is tightening its phone rules so pupils cannot carry phones at all during the school day, pushing past the 'no see, no hear' compromise many schools rely on.
- Head teachers' unions warn that lockable pouches and secure storage for every child would cost a great deal and are not workable without government money.
- Campaigners say 'no see, no hear' has failed, with pupils still secretly scrolling in toilets, and they want a future where a personal device is no longer a constant companion.
- Schools must now decide how to comply by September 2027, while Scotland prepares a law, Northern Ireland consults on one, and Wales has rejected a national ban for now.
In England, the government has decided that the school day should be one in which children do not carry their phones at all, moving beyond the familiar habit of keeping a device out of sight but within reach. The change, due from September 2027, asks schools to take on a more demanding kind of care for childhood attention and friendship, and it arrives at a moment when the people who must carry it out are asking who will pay for the lockers and pouches it requires. Across the nations of the United Kingdom, each place is answering the same question in its own way, as education is held separately in each, and the answer in England is still being shaped by schools, unions and the wider argument about what childhood should look like under the constant pull of the screen.
Under stricter guidance announced for England, pupils will no longer be allowed to have their phones on them at any point in the school day. The change goes beyond the rules that came into force in June, and it is due to take effect from September 2027. It aims at the "no see, no hear" approach used in some schools, where a phone could stay in a bag so long as nobody noticed it. Education Secretary Lucy Powell said the message to families was that school is for learning and friendship, not scrolling.
Schools will still choose how to comply. Some have already bought sealed pouches or lockers, others collect phones at the start of the day, and some have banned them from their sites altogether. Head teachers' leaders accept that phones can cause safety problems and distraction, but they warn that supplying secure storage for every pupil would be very expensive and is not feasible without government funding.
Supporters, including the Children's Commissioner and the campaign group Generation Focus, say softer rules have not worked and that children are still using phones in toilets. The Shadow Education Secretary welcomed the tougher line, while criticising the lack of a clear view on which new technologies belong in classrooms. Elsewhere in the UK the picture differs: Scotland is preparing a law, Northern Ireland is consulting on one, and Wales has voted against a national statutory ban. For now, the central question in England is who will pay for the storage.
Under stricter government guidance announced for England, pupils will no longer be allowed to have their phones on them at any point in the school day. The change goes further than the statutory guidance that came into force in June, which already made schools and trusts legally responsible for keeping the school day phone-free.
The new version is due to take effect from September 2027. Its target is the "no see, no hear" approach used in some schools, where a phone can stay in a pupil's bag as long as nobody sees or hears it. Under the tighter rules, the phone would not be on the pupil at all. Education Secretary Lucy Powell said the government's "clear message" to parents and pupils was that school is for learning and friendship, not scrolling. The government argued that access to phones risks pulling children away from their learning and from each other.
Schools will still choose how to comply. Some have already bought sealed pouches or secure lockers. Others collect phones at the start of the day, and some have banned them from their sites entirely.
Head teachers' unions raised the question of cost. Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the NAHT school leaders union, agreed that phones can raise safety issues and be an unhelpful distraction. But he said the more robust measures recommended in the guidance would come at a cost. Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said the guidance at least provides some clarity, but that school leaders cannot simply make phones disappear. If every school is expected to provide lockable pouches or other secure storage for every pupil, he said, the cost would be very significant, and it is not feasible unless government supplies the funding.
Others welcomed the tougher line. Dame Rachel de Souza, Children's Commissioner for England, backed strong action to stop phones distracting pupils and disrupting the school day. Charlotte Ashton, co-founder of the campaign group Generation Focus, said "no see, no hear" policies were not working and that pupils were still "TikToking in the toilets". She said the aim should be a point where it is no longer normal for every child to carry a personal internet-enabled device at all hours.
Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott said she was delighted that Labour had finally listened and agreed to properly ban smartphones in schools. She also said it was right for the government to review safety standards for technology used in schools, a review announced alongside the guidance after calls for improvement. But she criticised what she called a lack of joined-up thinking about which new technology is being allowed into classrooms.
Because education is devolved, the picture differs across the UK. Scotland's government has said it will bring in a new law restricting personal phone use in schools, and ran a consultation over the summer. In Wales, the Senedd recently voted down a motion for a national statutory ban on phones in classrooms; schools are encouraged to restrict use, but heads keep flexibility over their own rules. In Northern Ireland, Education Minister Paul Givan opened a 12-week consultation in August on whether to ban phones from schools by law, calling for a stronger and more consistent approach.
These school rules are separate from the UK's coming social media ban for under-16s, due in March. Children will be barred from platforms such as Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok, and the culture secretary has said Vinted and eBay could also be added to the list. For now, the open question in England is who pays for the storage, with the new rules due to apply from September 2027.
Citações Notáveis
If all schools are going to be expected to have lockable pouches or other secure storage facilities for every pupil, the cost involved will be very significant indeed.— Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary, Association of School and College Leaders
School is for learning and friendship, not scrolling.— Lucy Powell, Education Secretary