Prison system 'one major event from disaster' after early release U-turn

PC Andrew Harper, 28, was fatally injured during a quad bike theft response in 2019; his killers remain incarcerated. Domestic abuse victims face continued risk from dangerous abusers unable to be released.
one major incident away from disaster
Prison reform experts warn that the reversal leaves the system with almost no capacity to absorb any disruption.
Mark

So the Prime Minister reversed the early release scheme because of pressure over PC Harper's killers. But that seems to have created a different problem entirely.

Mimi

Exactly. The prisons are at 98 percent capacity. The early release scheme was meant to create space. Now that space won't materialize, and the system is extremely tight.

Luke

How much space was the scheme actually going to free up? The reporting says up to 6,000 prisoners were due to be released, now it's 4,600. That's a difference of 1,400. But what percentage of the total prison population is that?

Mimi

It's significant, but the reporting doesn't give us the total prison population, so we can't calculate the exact percentage. What we do know is that experts are saying even with the original scheme, alternative measures like deporting foreign prisoners wouldn't have freed enough space.

Mark

And the indefinite sentences—IPPs—those are supposed to help now?

Mimi

That's the theory. But the reporting makes clear it's complicated and will take time. There are over 2,000 people still serving IPPs even though they were abolished more than a decade ago. Releasing them won't happen quickly.

Luke

So Burnham is betting that deporting hundreds of foreign prisoners, plus eventually releasing some IPP inmates, will be enough to keep the system from collapsing. But nobody seems confident about that.

Mimi

Right. The prison reform experts are saying the system is now "one major incident away from disaster." A riot, a disturbance—anything could tip it over.

Mark

What about the sentencing reforms that Gauke led? Are those actually being abandoned?

Luke

The reporting says the reversal "threatens to undermine" them and has "undone some of that work." But it doesn't specify exactly which reforms are affected or how much progress is actually lost. That's a gap.

Mimi

The reforms were designed to improve rehabilitation and free up space. By narrowing the early release scheme, you're reducing one of the mechanisms that was supposed to make that work.

Mark

And the domestic abuse commissioner said victims won't feel safer. That's a human cost that doesn't get resolved by keeping abusers in prison longer if the system can't function.

Mimi

Exactly. The decision solves one political problem—PC Harper's killers stay in prison—but creates or worsens several others. It's a choice, not a solution.

  • The Harper family's years-long campaign forced a sitting prime minister to reverse course on a policy designed to prevent the prison system from collapsing — a rare and politically charged capitulation.
  • With prisons at 98 percent capacity, reform advocates warn the system is now 'one major incident away from disaster,' leaving officials with almost no margin to absorb a riot, outbreak, or surge in remand prisoners.
  • Alternative relief measures — deporting foreign nationals and releasing those on abolished indefinite sentences — are expected to free only hundreds of spaces, far short of what the original scheme was designed to provide.
  • Sentencing reforms built on a year-long independent review are now at risk of being quietly dismantled, with rehabilitation programmes, remand conditions, and long-term capacity planning all caught in the reversal's wake.
  • Domestic abuse victims and prison reform charities warn that the political victory obscures a human cost: dangerous individuals remain incarcerated in an overstretched system that cannot guarantee safety for anyone inside or out.

In the final days of August, Prime Minister Andy Burnham reversed a plan to release thousands of prisoners early in England and Wales, bowing to sustained public and familial pressure following the 2019 death of PC Andrew Harper. The decision spares roughly 1,400 offenders from early release, including those convicted of Harper's killing, but leaves a prison system operating at 98 percent capacity with little room to absorb the unexpected. It is a moment that reveals the enduring tension between the demands of public grief and the quieter, less visible imperatives of a justice system straining under its own weight.

On a Sunday in late August, Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced he was walking back a plan to release thousands of prisoners early across England and Wales. The reversal came after weeks of pressure from the family of PC Andrew Harper, a 28-year-old officer killed in 2019 while responding to a quad bike theft in Berkshire. The two men convicted of his manslaughter — both teenagers at the time — would have been freed under the original scheme. Now they will not.

The change affects around 1,400 prisoners. The government had planned to release up to 6,000 people early; that figure will now fall to approximately 4,600. Burnham described the decision as pushing the system to its absolute limits. Harper's mother, Debbie Adlam, welcomed the reversal but admitted the campaign had left her family exhausted and no further forward than where they began.

The relief, however, is largely symbolic. England and Wales prisons are running at 98 percent capacity, and the early release scheme existed precisely to create breathing room in a system ministers have long warned is near collapse. The alternatives Burnham offered — deporting foreign prisoners and releasing those still held on abolished indefinite sentences — are expected to yield only hundreds of additional spaces, not the thousands needed.

Prison reform advocates are sounding the alarm. The Howard League warned the estate is now one serious incident away from catastrophe. The reversal also threatens to unravel sentencing reforms drawn from a year-long independent review, reforms designed to improve rehabilitation and ease the flow of people through the system. With 18 percent of those imprisoned currently on remand awaiting trial, campaigners warn that full prisons become warehouses — places where self-harm rises and meaningful intervention disappears.

The political logic of Burnham's decision is legible: absorb the system's strain rather than face the backlash of releasing men convicted of killing a police officer. But the cost is now being counted in the currency of institutional fragility — a justice system that has traded one crisis for another, and may not survive the next unexpected shock.

On a Sunday in late August, Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced he was reversing a plan to release thousands of prisoners early. The decision came after weeks of sustained pressure from the family of PC Andrew Harper, a 28-year-old police officer killed in August 2019 while responding to a quad bike theft in Sulhamstead, Berkshire. Two men, Jessie Cole and Albert Bowers, who were both 17 at the time and passengers in the stolen vehicle, were sentenced to 13 years for manslaughter. Under the original early release scheme, they would have walked free. Now they will not.

The reversal affects roughly 1,400 prisoners across England and Wales. The scheme, which had been scheduled to begin that week, would have shortened sentences for offenders convicted of manslaughter in all its forms, as well as rapists, child sexual abusers, and groomers. The government had initially planned to release up to 6,000 prisoners early; that number is now expected to drop to around 4,600. Burnham framed the decision as a necessary boundary. "The truth is I wanted to go even further," he told the BBC. "But I've pushed the system to the very limits of what's possible without risking the prison system collapsing within months, putting the public at enormous risk."

Debbie Adlam, Harper's mother, expressed mixed feelings about the outcome. She told BBC Breakfast that while she was grateful for the reversal, the campaign to achieve it had been exhausting and ultimately left her family back where they started. "We're not making any headway or anything, we are just literally fighting to get back to where we were," she said. Police forces welcomed the decision. Jason Hogg, chief constable of Thames Valley Police, the force Harper served, said the announcement was about remembering the officer and acknowledging the lasting impact of his death on his colleagues, the communities he protected, and policing more broadly.

But the reversal has created a different crisis. England and Wales prisons are operating at 98 percent capacity. The early release scheme, despite its moral and political complications, was designed to create breathing room in a system that ministers have repeatedly warned is on the brink of collapse. Burnham's alternative measures—deporting foreign prisoners and releasing some inmates serving indefinite sentences—are unlikely to free up sufficient space. Officials acknowledged that only hundreds of foreign prisoners could realistically be deported. Indefinite sentences, or IPPs, were abolished more than a decade ago but still hold more than 2,000 people behind bars; releasing them would be complicated, take time, and free up few places in the short term.

Prison reform advocates are alarmed. Andrea Coomber, chief executive of the Howard League, a penal reform charity, said the decision leaves the prison estate "one major incident away from a disaster." A serious riot or public disturbance, she warned, could consume whatever limited capacity remains. The reversal also threatens to undermine sentencing reforms introduced after a year-long independent review led by former Justice Secretary David Gauke. Those reforms were designed to improve rehabilitation rates and create space for people entering the system. By narrowing the early release scheme, Burnham has effectively undone some of that work.

Nicole Jacobs, the domestic abuse commissioner for England and Wales, raised another concern: the decision offers no reassurance to domestic abuse victims. Dangerous abusers will remain in prison longer, but the system cannot guarantee their safety or the safety of others. Pia Sinha, chief executive of the Prison Reform Trust, pointed to a separate problem: 18 percent of those in prison are on remand awaiting trial. When prisons are full, she said, they become warehouses. Interventions cannot be delivered. Self-harm increases. Rehabilitation declines. The Gauke reforms, she emphasized, were not a cure-all, but they represented brave investment in the future. That progress, she warned, must not be lost.

Nick Timothy, the shadow justice secretary, accused the government of avoiding parliamentary scrutiny. He called for the scheme to be delayed, emergency primary legislation brought forward, and the worst offenders properly excluded. The political calculation is clear: Burnham chose to absorb the prison system's strain rather than face the public backlash of releasing the men convicted of killing a police officer. But the cost of that choice is now being measured in a different currency—the fragility of an already fractured system, the reversal of reform efforts, and the knowledge that one unexpected event could push the entire apparatus past its breaking point.

I've pushed the system to the very limits of what's possible without risking the prison system collapsing within months, putting the public at enormous risk.
— Prime Minister Andy Burnham
We're not making any headway or anything, we are just literally fighting to get back to where we were.
— Debbie Adlam, PC Harper's mother
All it will take is something like a serious riot or public disturbance and any capacity will be gone. It is just too close to the bone.
— Andrea Coomber, chief executive of the Howard League
Contact Us FAQ