Prince Harry and Meghan return to U.K. after six years in California

Non-working members of the royal family, coming home to stay apart
Harry and Meghan return to the U.K. after six years but maintain their distance from official royal duties.
Mark

Why come back at all if they're not returning to royal duties? What's the point of the move?

Mimi

They have children now who are old enough to understand where they come from. The statement they made back in 2020 was always about balance—raising their kids with a sense of the royal tradition while maintaining independence. Maybe they felt six years in California was enough to build that independence, and now they can afford to be closer to home without losing what they've created.

Mark

But they lost a security case and just got hit with a multimillion-dollar court judgment. That doesn't sound like a position of strength.

Mimi

No, it doesn't. Those losses are real setbacks. But they're separate from the decision to move. The court rulings might actually make living in the U.K. more complicated, not less. They'll need to figure out security without government support, which is expensive and difficult.

Mark

So why risk it? Why not stay in California where they have their operation running smoothly?

Mimi

Children need roots. And maybe after six years, the idea of being permanently exiled from your own country wears on you, regardless of how successful you've become elsewhere. The Cotswolds is a compromise—close enough to London to be part of the fabric, far enough away to maintain the privacy and separation they've always wanted.

Mark

Do you think the royal family is ready for them to be back?

Mimi

Ready or not, they're coming. The Prime Minister's response was polite but distant—a "wish them well" that doesn't commit to anything. That's probably the tone of the whole thing now. They're not enemies, but they're not integrated either. They'll be living in Britain as outsiders to the institution they were born into.

  • Harry and Meghan touched down in Birmingham after six years in California, bringing their children Archie and Lilibet back to a country they barely know.
  • The couple returns not in triumph but in the shadow of consecutive legal losses — a failed security challenge in 2024 and a costly defamation ruling against the Daily Mail's publisher handed down the same week as their arrival.
  • Despite relocating to Britain, the Sussexes have made clear they will not resume any official royal duties, maintaining the non-working status they have held since 2020.
  • Prime Minister Andy Burnham offered only a measured, arms-length acknowledgment of their return, signaling that the government — and perhaps the institution — has moved on.
  • The family is expected to settle in the Cotswolds, where their children will begin school the following week, framing the move less as a royal event and more as a family starting over.

Six years after stepping away from royal duties amid family fracture and public scrutiny, Prince Harry and Meghan have returned to British soil — not to reclaim what was left behind, but to begin something quieter. Landing in Birmingham with their two young children, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are settling in the Cotswolds as private individuals, shaped by legal defeats and the long passage of time. Their return asks an old question in a new register: what does it mean to come home when home itself has changed?

Prince Harry and Meghan landed in Birmingham on a Wednesday afternoon, six years after leaving the United Kingdom in a cloud of family tension and public controversy. They had departed in early 2020 with a stated desire for balance — to raise their son with an understanding of royal tradition while building financial independence apart from the institution. That chapter unfolded in California, where they constructed a media and philanthropic life largely separate from the family they left behind.

Their return was not a reversal. A spokesperson declined to comment on travel arrangements, and the couple made clear they had no intention of resuming official duties. They would remain non-working royals, as they had been throughout their years abroad. The BBC reported the family planned to settle in the Cotswolds, where Archie, now seven, and Lilibet, now five, were set to begin at a new school the following week.

The move came against a backdrop of legal setbacks. Harry's 2024 challenge against the downgrading of his U.K. security detail had failed in court. Then, in the same week as his return, he and six other claimants were ordered to pay several million dollars to the Daily Mail's publisher after a judge found their defamation claims unreasonable to a high degree. The losses had compounded.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham described the return as a private matter, wishing the couple well without ceremony or resistance. What remained was a quieter, more human question — how a family that had spent six years remaking itself across an ocean would now learn to live in Britain again, not as working royals or public figures with official function, but simply as people navigating the distance between who they were and who they had become.

Prince Harry and Meghan landed in Birmingham on Wednesday afternoon after six years away, touching down in a private aircraft with their two children in tow. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex had departed the United Kingdom in early 2020 in a cloud of family tension, announcing their intention to step back from senior royal duties and build financial independence on their own terms. Now they were coming home—though not, by any measure, to resume the roles they had abandoned.

The couple's statement in January 2020 had framed the move as a search for balance: they wanted their son to grow up understanding the royal tradition into which he was born, while carving out space for their family to pursue what came next. That next chapter had unfolded in California, where they built a media and philanthropic operation largely separate from the institution they left behind. The decision to leave had rippled through the royal family, creating fractures that remained unhealed six years later.

Their return to Britain was not a reversal. A spokesperson made clear the couple would not be commenting on their private travel arrangements, citing security and privacy concerns. More significantly, Harry and Meghan had no intention of reclaiming any official capacity. They would remain non-working members of the royal family—a status they had maintained throughout their California years and would continue to hold now. The BBC reported they were expected to settle in the Cotswolds, an affluent region about two hours west of London, where their two children—Archie, now seven, and Lilibet, now five—were due to start at a new school the following week.

The timing of the move came against a backdrop of legal setbacks. In 2024, Harry had mounted a challenge against a government decision to downgrade his security detail on visits back to the U.K., a consequence of his departure from royal duties. The court had ruled against him. Then, on Friday of the same week as his return, Harry and six other high-profile claimants were ordered to pay several million dollars to the Daily Mail's publisher after a court found their defamation claims against the paper to be unreasonable to a high degree. The legal losses had accumulated.

When asked about security arrangements for the couple's return, Prime Minister Andy Burnham characterized it as a private matter for the Sussexes themselves, offering a measured wish that they would fare well in their new chapter. The statement carried no warmth, but neither did it carry resistance. The machinery of government had moved on from the drama of their departure. What remained was the practical question of how a family that had spent six years building a life on the other side of the Atlantic would now navigate living in Britain again—not as working royals, not as public figures with official function, but simply as members of a family that had learned to live apart.

This geographic balance will enable us to raise our son with an appreciation for the royal tradition into which he was born, while also providing our family with the space to focus on the next chapter, including the launch of our new charitable entity.
— Harry and Meghan's statement from January 2020
Prime Minister Andy Burnham said the security arrangements were a private matter for the Sussexes and expressed that he and his family wish them well in the moves they are making.
— Prime Minister Andy Burnham
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su CBS News ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti