Prenatal 'Forever Chemical' Exposure Linked to Childhood Leukemia in UC Irvine Study

Children diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the most common childhood cancer, were part of the study cohort.
The blood samples were drawn when the children were only days old.
UC Irvine researchers analyzed newborn blood from Los Angeles County children, some later diagnosed with leukemia.
Mark

Why does it matter that they used newborn blood?

Mimi

Because it measures what was in the baby at birth, not what parents remember using or eating. Vieira says that directly captures a critical window of development.

Luke

But it's 125 cases and 219 controls, all from Los Angeles County. That's small and local.

Mimi

Rena Jones says the same, that it should be read cautiously. She wasn't part of the study, and she still calls it added evidence.

Mark

So do forever chemicals cause leukemia?

Luke

The study doesn't say that. The researchers say they can't claim cause, only that the chemicals might contribute to risk.

Mark

What about the finding that wealthier families had higher PFOS?

Mimi

Vieira ties it to products like Scotchgard, weather-resistant clothing and makeup. Higher levels become an indirect marker of socioeconomic status.

Luke

Which also means income-related factors could tangle with the result. The source doesn't say how the team handled that, so I can't tell you.

Mark

Is there anything reassuring?

Mimi

Children born later had lower levels, which suggests phase-outs are working. Filtered water is one easy step, Vieira says.

Luke

Against that, 26 other PFAS showed up, and nobody knows how toxic they are.

  • Newborn blood samples, drawn within days of birth, now hold clues that may connect prenatal chemical exposure to later childhood leukemia.
  • Forever chemicals with names like PFOA and PFOS, found in cookware, packaging, and water, sit at the center of a cancer question that researchers cannot yet answer with certainty.
  • The study's small size and single-county scope have prompted experts to urge caution, even as the signal lines up with earlier findings on other childhood cancers.
  • Children born later in the study period carry lower PFAS levels, suggesting that phase-outs are working, while 26 lesser-known compounds remain unstudied and larger research is still needed.

Before a child has taken a first breath of the world's air or drunk its water, the chemical traces of that world are already present in the blood. In Los Angeles County, researchers at UC Irvine looked back at newborn samples from children born between 2000 and 2015, some of whom would later be diagnosed with leukemia, and found that higher levels of the long-lived compounds known as PFAS, particularly PFOA and PFOS, were associated with greater risk. The findings hint at a quiet inheritance from an age of manufactured durability, yet the researchers are careful to say that association is not the same as cause. Still, as later-born children show lower levels, there is a measured reason for cautious hope that the most persistent of these substances are slowly leaving our shared environment.

The blood samples were taken when the children were only days old. Researchers at UC Irvine returned to those newborn samples, gathered from babies born in Los Angeles County between 2000 and 2015, to ask what chemicals had already settled into their bodies at birth, and whether those chemicals might say something about the cancer some of these children would later develop.

The study compared 125 children later diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the most common childhood cancer, with 219 who remained cancer-free. Seventeen PFAS compounds, the so-called forever chemicals, appeared in the samples, mostly PFOA and PFOS. Higher levels were linked to greater leukemia risk, and the association grew stronger when both compounds were present together.

The researchers are careful not to overstate what they found. They cannot say these chemicals cause cancer, only that they may contribute to risk. Veronica Vieira, the study's corresponding author, described the value of measuring exposure at the very start of life, when development is most sensitive. Outside expert Rena Jones urged caution given the limited geography and sample, while noting that the work adds to growing evidence linking PFAS in pregnancy to this leukemia.

The data also revealed patterns in who carried higher levels. Children of older, U.S.-born, more educated parents with private insurance had more PFOS exposure, a pattern Vieira explained by the chemicals' presence in pricier and nonessential products, making them an indirect marker of socioeconomic status.

There was a note of relief as well. Children born later in the period had lower levels, a sign that some persistent compounds may be fading from production and slowly leaving the body. Filtered drinking water offers one simple way to reduce exposure further. Yet 26 additional PFAS remain poorly understood, and both researchers agree that larger studies are needed to learn what they mean for children.

The blood samples were drawn when the children were only days old. Researchers at UC Irvine went back to those newborn samples, collected from babies born in Los Angeles County between 2000 and 2015, to ask what chemicals were already in their bodies at birth, and whether that might tell them something about the cancer some of them developed later.

The study compared two groups: 125 children who were later diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the most common childhood cancer, and 219 children who stayed cancer-free. Seventeen different PFAS, the group of compounds known as "forever chemicals," turned up in the samples, mostly PFOA and PFOS. Higher levels were associated with a greater likelihood of developing the leukemia, and when both PFOA and PFOS were present together, the association with cancer risk was stronger still. The work was published in April in the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.

The researchers are careful about what this does and does not show. They cannot say that forever chemicals cause cancer, only that the chemicals may contribute to risk. PFAS is a catch-all label for roughly 14,000 man-made compounds, tied in other research to cancers and fertility problems. They earned the nickname because they break down so slowly and can accumulate in the body. They turn up in drinking water, nonstick cookware, food and drink packaging, and cosmetics.

"This research moves us closer to understanding what babies are exposed to from the very start by directly measuring PFAS present at birth," said Veronica Vieira, the study's corresponding author and a UCI professor of environmental and occupational health. She said that capturing exposure during a critical window of development gives a clearer picture of how environmental contaminants may feed into childhood cancer risk.

Outside experts see the results as meaningful but limited. Rena Jones, a National Institutes of Health researcher who studies environmental contaminants and was not involved, said the findings should be interpreted cautiously because the study covered only Los Angeles County and used a small sample. Still, she said, it adds to growing evidence that PFAS exposure during pregnancy may contribute to this leukemia. Childhood cancer rates have risen in recent decades in industrialized countries, including the United States, which the study says hints at environmental factors. The same team previously linked elevated PFOA and PFOS to other childhood cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia and Wilms tumor.

The data also showed who tended to carry more of these chemicals. Children whose parents were older, born in the U.S., more highly educated and covered by private insurance had higher PFOS exposure. Vieira explained that forever chemicals are common in nonessential or pricier products such as Scotchgard, weather-resistant clothing and makeup, so high levels can serve as an indirect measure of socioeconomic status.

There was some encouraging news. Children born later in the study period had lower PFAS levels, which suggests that some of the more persistent compounds have been phased out of production. "They're slowly degrading in the environment and being excreted," Vieira said. She noted that drinking filtered water is one easy way to cut exposure further.

The researchers also found 26 additional PFAS beyond the 17 most prominent ones, including compounds that have not been well studied. Vieira said it is unclear how toxic they are. Jones said the findings point to a need for larger studies covering a broader range of PFAS, newer compounds among them.

This research moves us closer to understanding what babies are exposed to from the very start by directly measuring PFAS present at birth.
— Veronica Vieira, UC Irvine professor and corresponding author
The findings should be interpreted cautiously, but add to growing evidence that prenatal PFAS exposure may contribute to leukemia.
— Rena Jones, NIH researcher not involved in the study
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei The Mercury News ↗
Kontakt FAQ