In the blood of newborns drawn over a decade and a half in Los Angeles County, researchers found traces of a vast family of industrial chemicals that do not easily leave the body or the earth. Years later, those few drops of stored life became a quiet witness: children who would go on to develop the most common childhood cancer had carried higher levels of certain of these compounds from their first days. The study cannot yet say that the chemicals caused the illness, only that they may add to the risk, and so it stands as a careful signal rather than a verdict. It is part of a longer human in
Prenatal 'Forever Chemical' Exposure Linked to Childhood Leukemia in New UC Irvine Study
Seventeen different forever chemicals were found in newborn blood
Why does measuring blood from newborns matter so much here?
Because it captures what babies carry at birth. Vieira described it as looking at a critical window of development, rather than guessing at exposure later.
What did they actually find?
Seventeen PFAS compounds, mostly PFOA and PFOS. Higher levels went with greater likelihood of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and the two together showed an even stronger link.
Let's be clear about the limits. Does this show PFAS cause leukemia?
No. The researchers say it can't show that, only that the chemicals might contribute to risk.
And the sample? 125 cases and 219 controls is not large, and it's one county.
Rena Jones said exactly that, that it should be read cautiously. She wasn't involved, but she called it added evidence nonetheless.
The socioeconomic pattern surprised me.
Children of older, more educated, privately insured parents had higher PFOS. Vieira's explanation is that these chemicals appear in nonessential or costlier products, so levels work as an indirect marker of status.
That's her explanation, though. The reporting doesn't test it.
True. And the 26 other PFAS compounds are the open question: how toxic they are is unknown.
So the hopeful part is the decline?
Later births had lower levels, suggesting some chemicals were phased out. But that's a trend, not an all-clear.
El Pulso
- Newborn blood samples from Los Angeles County, collected years ago, are reopened and reveal 17 PFAS compounds in every child tested.
- Children later diagnosed with leukemia carried higher levels of PFOA and PFOS, and the two together appeared to raise the risk further.
- Scientists urge restraint: the sample was small, the region narrow, and the chemicals may contribute to cancer rather than cause it.
- Reassuring signs appear as later births show lower PFAS levels, yet 26 other compounds remain largely unstudied and their toxicity unknown.
In the blood of newborns drawn over a decade and a half in Los Angeles County, researchers found traces of a vast family of industrial chemicals that do not easily leave the body or the earth. Years later, those few drops of stored life became a quiet witness: children who would go on to develop the most common childhood cancer had carried higher levels of certain of these compounds from their first days. The study cannot yet say that the chemicals caused the illness, only that they may add to the risk, and so it stands as a careful signal rather than a verdict. It is part of a longer human inquiry into how the things we make and spread across the world find their way into the youngest bodies.
The blood was taken from tiny heel pricks on newborns in Los Angeles County hospitals between 2000 and 2015. Years later, researchers at UC Irvine returned to those samples and found traces of PFAS, a family of roughly 14,000 man-made chemicals often called forever chemicals, in every one. They detected 17 different compounds, most of them PFOA and PFOS.
The team, publishing in April, compared 125 children later diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia against 219 who stayed cancer-free. Because the chemicals were measured at birth, the researchers could see what the babies carried from the very start, rather than relying on memories of exposure. Higher levels were linked to greater leukemia risk, and the link grew stronger when both PFOA and PFOS were present.
The researchers were careful. They cannot say the chemicals cause leukemia, only that they may contribute to it. Outside experts, including Rena Jones of the National Institutes of Health, urged caution given the small, regional sample, while noting that the work adds to growing evidence linking pregnancy exposure to the disease.
The data also revealed who tended to carry more: children of older, U.S.-born, highly educated parents with private insurance. Vieira explained that these chemicals appear in pricier or nonessential goods, making them an indirect marker of social status.
There was hope in the later births, which showed lower levels as some persistent compounds were phased out. Still, 26 other PFAS chemicals remain poorly understood, and larger studies covering newer compounds are needed.
The blood came from heel pricks on newborns, drawn in Los Angeles County hospitals between 2000 and 2015. Years later, researchers at UC Irvine went back to those samples and found, in each of them, traces of the industrial compounds known as PFAS. In all, they detected 17 different ones.
The study, published in April in the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, compared two groups. One was 125 children who were later diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the most common childhood cancer. The other was 219 children who stayed cancer-free. Because the chemicals were measured in blood taken at birth, the team was looking at what the babies carried from the very start rather than relying on later recollections of exposure.
The compounds that turned up most were PFOA and PFOS. Higher levels were linked to a greater likelihood of developing the leukemia, and when both were present together, the association with cancer risk was stronger still.
PFAS is shorthand for a family of roughly 14,000 man-made compounds, often called forever chemicals because they break down slowly and can accumulate in the body. They show up in drinking water, nonstick cookware, food and drink packaging, and cosmetics. They have been tied to cancers and fertility problems.
The researchers are careful about what the results do and do not show. They cannot say the chemicals cause leukemia; the finding is that they may contribute to risk. Veronica Vieira, the study's corresponding author and a UCI professor of environmental and occupational health, said the work moves scientists closer to understanding what babies are exposed to by measuring PFAS present at birth. Capturing a critical window of development, she said, gives a clearer picture of how contaminants may bear on childhood cancer risk.
Outside voices urged restraint. Rena Jones, a National Institutes of Health researcher who studies environmental contaminants and was not part of the study, said the findings should be interpreted cautiously because the work was confined to Los Angeles County and the sample was small. Still, she said, it adds to growing evidence that PFAS exposure in pregnancy may contribute to acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Childhood cancer rates have risen in recent decades in industrialized countries including the U.S., which the study says hints at environmental factors. The same team had earlier tied elevated PFOA and PFOS to other childhood cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia and Wilms tumor.
The data also showed who tended to carry more. Children whose parents were older, born in the U.S., more highly educated and covered by private insurance had higher PFOS exposure. Vieira explained that these chemicals turn up often in nonessential or pricier goods, such as Scotchgard, weather-resistant clothing and makeup, so high levels can serve as an indirect measure of socioeconomic status.
There was encouraging news as well. Children born later in the period had lower PFAS levels, which suggests that some of the more persistent compounds have been phased out of production. Vieira said they are slowly degrading in the environment and being excreted, and she noted that drinking filtered water is one simple way to cut exposure further.
But the researchers also identified 26 additional PFAS chemicals, some of them poorly studied, and Vieira said it is unclear how toxic they are. Jones said the findings point to the need for larger studies covering a broader range of PFAS, including newer compounds.
Citas Notables
The study moves us closer to understanding what babies are exposed to from the start by directly measuring PFAS present at birth.— Veronica Vieira, UC Irvine professor and corresponding author
The findings should be interpreted cautiously but add to growing evidence on PFAS in pregnancy and leukemia.— Rena Jones, National Institutes of Health researcher