In a market buoyed by forces that may not endure — geopolitical oil shocks, election-year generosity, and AI exuberance — portfolio manager Darren Sissons is practicing the ancient investor's art of looking where others are not looking. Rather than chasing what has already risen, he turns toward the neglected corners of the market, where underperformance has quietly created opportunity. His counsel is not alarm but calibration: small, deliberate adjustments that honor both the gains already made and the uncertainty that lies ahead.
Portfolio Manager Sissons Eyes Laggard Sectors Amid AI, Oil Gains Questions
Small adjustments generate better risk-adjusted returns than sudden pivots.
You're suggesting investors nibble at sectors that have lagged. But how do you know this isn't just the market telling you those sectors deserve to lag?
Fair question. The point isn't that laggards are automatically good buys. It's that when three specific things—geopolitical risk, election-year stimulus, and AI enthusiasm—have driven most of the year's gains, you're looking at a concentrated bet. Mean reversion isn't guaranteed, but it's a reasonable hedge.
So you're not abandoning AI and oil and financials?
Not at all. I'm saying don't suddenly pivot away from them. But if you've been underweight healthcare or consumer staples because they seemed boring, this might be the moment to add a little.
The buyback programs you mention—Mettler Toledo, JPMorgan—why do those matter so much to you?
Because they're tax-efficient ways to return capital, and they work especially well when the stock is down. If a company buys back shares at depressed prices, the remaining shareholders own a larger piece of the same business. It's compounding in your favor.
You mention that sudden portfolio pivots are unwise. But isn't waiting for the perfect moment also a form of risk?
Absolutely. That's why I'm talking about small tweaks, not waiting. The risk of doing nothing is real. The risk of doing too much too fast is also real. The answer is usually somewhere in the middle.
What happens if the midterms produce a less supportive administration and AI growth actually does slow?
Then the sectors that have lagged—healthcare, consumer staples, logistics—become the places where returns come from. That's the bet. Not that it will happen, but that if it does, you're not caught flat-footed.
Le Pouls
- Three pillars holding up 2026's market gains — an Iranian oil spike, midterm fiscal spending, and AI euphoria — are each showing signs of structural fragility.
- The risk is not a crash but a quiet reversal: as geopolitical tensions ease and election-year policy support fades, the sectors that led may simply stop leading.
- Sissons is nudging portfolios toward consumer discretionary, healthcare, logistics, and medical technology — sectors left behind while capital chased shinier returns.
- His three picks — Mettler Toledo, Alimentation Couche-Tard, and JPMorgan Chase — share a common logic: durable compounding, disciplined buybacks, and resilience across cycles.
- His own recent track record, averaging a negative three percent return across prior recommendations, is a candid reminder that conviction and outcome do not always arrive together.
In a market buoyed by forces that may not endure — geopolitical oil shocks, election-year generosity, and AI exuberance — portfolio manager Darren Sissons is practicing the ancient investor's art of looking where others are not looking. Rather than chasing what has already risen, he turns toward the neglected corners of the market, where underperformance has quietly created opportunity. His counsel is not alarm but calibration: small, deliberate adjustments that honor both the gains already made and the uncertainty that lies ahead.
Darren Sissons, portfolio manager at Campbell, Lee & Ross, is sitting with an uncomfortable question: what happens when the three engines driving 2026's market gains run out of fuel? An Iranian conflict sent oil stocks surging. A White House facing midterm elections kept spending freely and policy accommodative. And artificial intelligence generated wealth at a pace that feels increasingly detached from underlying economics. Each of these forces, Sissons argues, carries an expiration date.
The oil rally was the kind that happens once a decade — sudden and already fading as peace talk rumors circulate. Election-year fiscal support is transparent in its temporariness; administrations change, and the accommodative environment will not survive the midterms. As for AI, the growth has been real, but no trajectory sustains itself indefinitely. The question is not whether a slowdown comes, but when.
Sissons' response is not a dramatic portfolio overhaul but careful, selective exposure to the sectors that lagged while money chased oil, financials, and AI. Consumer discretionary, healthcare, medical technology, and logistics all underperformed — and are now candidates for mean reversion. The logic is old and simple: buy what is cheap after others have ignored it. Large sudden shifts, he cautions, generate tax liabilities and invite the dangers of overconfident market calls. Small adjustments, by contrast, compound quietly into better risk-adjusted returns.
His three picks embody this philosophy. Mettler Toledo, a global weighing solutions leader, has sold off in 2026 despite two decades of steady revenue and profit growth. Its annual buyback program — averaging three percent of shares over twenty years — becomes especially powerful when the stock is down. Alimentation Couche-Tard, the second-largest gas and convenience store operator in the United States, has grown revenue and net income at nearly ten and thirteen percent annually since 2016, and continues expanding through acquisitions. JPMorgan Chase, yielding two percent with a thirteen percent annual dividend growth rate, has demonstrated crisis-tested risk management across multiple downturns — twice receiving distressed banks from the Federal Reserve at discount, a mark of institutional trust few peers can claim.
Sissons' own recent picks offer a grounding note. Novo Nordisk is down twenty-one percent from his August 2025 recommendation. Visa has slipped eight percent. Tourmaline Oil has gained thirteen percent. The average across the three sits at negative three percent — a quiet reminder that even seasoned managers navigate the same fog of uncertainty as everyone else.
Darren Sissons, a portfolio manager at Campbell, Lee & Ross Investment Management, is sitting with a puzzle. The year 2026 has been generous to investors—markets are up substantially—but the gains rest on three pillars that feel unstable the moment you lean on them. Oil stocks spiked because of geopolitical tension in Iran. The White House, facing midterm elections, has been spending freely and keeping policy accommodative, a pattern as predictable as it is temporary. And artificial intelligence has generated wealth at a pace that feels almost detached from the underlying economics. Sissons is asking the question that keeps portfolio managers awake: what happens when these three things stop working?
The Iranian conflict created the kind of oil rally that happens once a decade—sudden, outsized, and already fading as peace talk rumors circulate. That retracement, Sissons notes, made profit-taking prudent. The election-year dynamics are even more transparent. A president facing midterms wants to avoid becoming a lame duck, so fiscal spending flows and policy tilts favorable. But administrations change. The supportive environment will not last. As for AI, the wealth creation has been real, but the current growth trajectory cannot sustain itself indefinitely. A slowdown is coming. The question is not whether, but when.
Given this landscape, Sissons is considering a tactical shift—not a dramatic portfolio overhaul, but careful nibbling at the sectors that lagged in 2026. Consumer discretionary stocks, consumer staples, logistics plays vulnerable to tariff policy, and healthcare and medical technology all underperformed while money chased oil, financials, and artificial intelligence. These laggards are candidates for what investors call mean reversion: a return to historical performance levels after a period of underperformance. The appeal is straightforward: buy what is cheap after others have ignored it.
But Sissons is cautious about the mechanics. Large, sudden shifts in portfolio composition trigger substantial tax bills. They also tend to be unwise if they rest on a major bet about market direction or sector rotation. Small adjustments, by contrast, generate better risk-adjusted returns. The move is not to abandon AI, oil, or financials—those may well continue delivering outsized gains. It is to selectively increase exposure to the parts of the market that have been left behind.
His three top picks reflect this philosophy. Mettler Toledo, a global leader in scales and weighing solutions, has sold off in 2026 despite a structural business model. The company generates more than five percent revenue growth annually and has done so for two decades. Its profit growth runs even faster—more than nine percent over ten years, a four-point premium to revenue growth. The company does not pay a dividend but instead runs an annual buyback program averaging three percent of shares outstanding over twenty years. With the stock down, that eight-hundred-million-dollar buyback becomes especially valuable for long-term holders. The absence of a dividend means the stock tends to get hit during market weakness, creating entry points for patient investors.
Alimentation Couche-Tard has grown from modest roots to become the second-largest gas and convenience store operator in the United States, with significant European operations. The company operates seventeen thousand three hundred locations globally, of which thirteen thousand two hundred provide roadside refueling. It is a serial dividend increaser yielding one point one percent, and it has grown revenue and net income at annual rates of nine point nine percent and twelve point nine percent respectively since 2016. A recent acquisition of two hundred thirty-five gas stations from Giant Eagle signals continued expansion. The company also runs a buyback program that has retired an average of two percent of shares annually.
JPMorgan Chase rounds out the trio. The bank yields two percent and has grown its dividend at thirteen percent annually since 2016. More importantly, it has demonstrated industry-leading risk management through multiple crises, most notably the global financial crisis when other banks failed or required government rescue. The Federal Reserve has twice sold JPMorgan distressed banks at substantial discounts—Washington Mutual in 2008 and First Republic in 2023—a sign of the bank's standing as a lender of last resort. Earnings per share have grown at thirteen percent annually over the past decade, and the company has retired an average of three percent of shares annually through buybacks.
Sissons' past picks offer a mixed record. Novo Nordisk, recommended in August 2025 at fifty-five dollars thirty-four cents, has fallen to forty-three dollars eighty-one cents, a loss of twenty-one percent. Tourmaline Oil, meanwhile, has risen from fifty-seven dollars ninety-eight cents to sixty-five dollars fifty-five cents, a gain of thirteen percent. Visa has declined from three hundred fifty-one dollars eighteen cents to three hundred twenty-two dollars fifteen cents, a loss of eight percent. The average total return across the three is negative three percent—a reminder that even experienced managers navigate uncertainty.
Citations marquantes
Sustainability of the current growth cadence is questionable, so a growth slowdown is inevitable.— Darren Sissons on artificial intelligence
Small tweaks typically generate a better risk adjusted reward than sudden portfolio pivots.— Darren Sissons on portfolio strategy