Popular hawker brands dominate new centres, raising concerns about diversity

If we don't attract younger customers, this tradition might die out
Kumiko Tan explains why Hakka Leipopo expands to reach younger diners, not just the elderly.
Mark

So these brands are technically following the rules by registering stalls under family members' names. Is that actually a problem, or is it just how business works?

Mimi

It's legal, yes, but it creates a two-tier system. A husband and wife can operate four stalls total. A single hawker can only operate two. That's not really a level playing field, and it advantages people with family capital.

Luke

But wait—the NEA says relatives have to personally operate their stalls. Are they actually checking that? Or is it an honour system?

Mimi

That's the gap. The rule exists, but enforcement is unclear. One brand even pulled out of an interview when asked how they grew, which suggests some uncertainty about whether what they're doing would withstand scrutiny.

Mark

And these established brands—do they actually get preferential treatment when new hawker centres open?

Mimi

Operators say no, but Derek Cheong, who runs Berempah Bros, says it's "100 per cent" easier once you're already in the system. Operators know you, know your food works, know you can handle the operational demands.

Luke

That's his perception, though. Did The Straits Times find evidence that established brands are formally favoured in tender processes?

Mimi

Not formal evidence, no. But the data shows overlap rates of 21 to 38 per cent at some centres, which suggests something is happening. Whether it's preference or just that established brands are better equipped to apply and operate—that's harder to prove.

Mark

What worries the critics most?

Mimi

That homogenisation will discourage new hawkers with unconventional ideas. If you see the same ten brands everywhere, why would you risk your savings on something different?

Luke

But some younger hawkers said seeing successful chains actually made them more interested in becoming hawkers, because they saw it was a viable business model. So does repetition discourage innovation or encourage entrepreneurship?

Mimi

Both, probably. It depends on the person and the food. The real concern is that we're losing the eccentricity and neighbourhood integration that made hawker centres special.

Mark

Is there a fix?

Mimi

Some operators are trying—subsidised rents for heritage dishes, mentorship programmes, assistance for first-timers. Seetoh wants a hawker academy. But the fundamental question is still unresolved: Are these centres supposed to preserve culture or incubate businesses?

  • The same handful of brands — Munchi Pancakes in 11 centres, Eng Kee Chicken Wings in 12, Tong Fong Fatt in over 15 — are quietly reshaping what it feels like to eat at a hawker centre built for community.
  • A two-stall ownership cap exists on paper, but families register stalls under different members' names, keeping the rule technically intact while hollowing out its intent.
  • Established brands enjoy compounding advantages: operator relationships, proven track records, and the simple fact that familiarity opens doors that newcomers cannot yet knock on.
  • Tommy Pang's rapid rise and catastrophic collapse — 30-plus outlets, then half a million dollars lost in six months — stands as a cautionary parable about expansion without infrastructure or soul.
  • Food critic K.F. Seetoh warns that ubiquity silences the symphony of hawker culture, and that unconventional new hawkers may never try if they believe the odds are already stacked against them.
  • Policymakers and operators are beginning to debate mentorship programmes, subsidised stalls for heritage dishes, and hawker academies — searching for a model that honours both success and possibility.

In Singapore's newer hawker centres, a quiet transformation is underway: the same beloved brand names appear again and again across the island, raising a deeper question about what a food culture loses when familiarity crowds out discovery. Regulatory limits on stall ownership exist, but family-registered expansions have allowed popular brands to multiply far beyond the spirit of those rules. What unfolds is not merely a business story, but a civilisational one — about whether a nation's culinary soul is best protected by preserving what is known, or by leaving room for what has not yet been imagined.

Walk into any of Singapore's newer hawker centres and you will likely encounter a familiar name. Munchi Pancakes, Eng Kee Chicken Wings, Tong Fong Fatt Hainanese Boneless Chicken Rice — these brands have multiplied across the island's socially conscious enterprise hawker centres, built after 2015 with community in mind. Their ubiquity is not accidental, and it is beginning to trouble food critics and policymakers alike.

The National Environment Agency limits each individual to two cooked food stalls, a rule designed to preserve diversity. In practice, popular brands have grown far beyond that ceiling by registering stalls under spouses, children, and siblings — a method that is legal, but that quietly dissolves the rule's intent. The NEA permits this arrangement as long as family members personally operate their stalls, and it places no cap on how many outlets a brand may run overall.

Some of those brands tell genuinely human stories. Kumiko Tan of Hakka Leipopo spent years refining thunder tea rice — a childhood taste from Johor Bahru — before winning a stall through a blind taste test. She now operates five locations, each one settled before the next is opened, driven by a mission to show younger Singaporeans that Hakka tradition still has a place at the table. Derek Cheong, the 29-year-old MasterChef Singapore winner behind Berempah Bros, chose his locations strategically and conducts weekly quality checks, knowing that what made a brand worth expanding is also the first thing expansion can destroy.

The Eng Kee family runs their chicken wing empire with similar discipline. Nicholas Lim spent a month learning the marinade before being allowed near daily operations. Consistency, he says, is their greatest challenge — and their greatest obligation to the brand his family built.

Yet the data tells a more complicated story. Across FairPrice-run hawker centres, between 21 and 38 per cent of stalls are brands already present elsewhere. Veteran food critic K.F. Seetoh can rattle off six to eight names he sees everywhere. "Seeing the same thing over and over again doesn't move the symphony of our hawker stalls," he says, warning that aspiring hawkers with unconventional ideas may never try if they believe the landscape is already claimed.

The risks of unchecked expansion are real. Tommy Pang built two chains to over 30 outlets in under a year, then lost half a million dollars in six months when outlets cannibalised each other and franchisees lacked his personal investment. He shut nearly 20 stalls in quick succession — a collapse that illustrated how quickly a brand built on passion can unravel when scaled beyond its foundations.

The deeper question, as one researcher frames it, is what hawker centres are actually for: timeless guardians of culinary heritage, or accessible launchpads for the next generation of food entrepreneurs? Some operators are attempting both — subsidising stalls for young hawkers serving heritage dishes, pairing them with mentorship and marketing. Seetoh envisions a hawker academy teaching different business models entirely. The conversation is not about punishing success. It is about deciding, deliberately, what kind of food culture Singapore chooses to carry forward.

Walk into any of Singapore's newer hawker centres and you will notice the same things: high ceilings, industrial fans, and in the corner, a stall bearing a name you have seen before. Munchi Pancakes appears in 11 of the 16 socially conscious enterprise hawker centres built after 2015. Eng Kee Chicken Wings operates 12 outlets. Tong Fong Fatt Hainanese Boneless Chicken Rice runs more than 15 stalls. These are not anomalies. They are the shape of the hawker landscape now, and they raise a question that food critics and policymakers are beginning to ask: What happens to a food culture when the same names keep appearing everywhere?

The regulatory framework was supposed to prevent this. The National Environment Agency limits each individual to a maximum of two cooked food stalls across all hawker centre types. Yet somehow, popular brands have built sprawling operations. The answer lies in a loophole that is technically legal but philosophically troubling: they register stalls under family members' names. A husband and wife can each hold two stalls. A son can hold two more. The rule remains intact on paper while the spirit of it dissolves in practice.

Kumiko Tan, founder of Hakka Leipopo, arrived at her first stall in Bukit Merah in December 2021 after three failed bids. She and her husband, Khoo Hao Ting, had started making thunder tea rice to recapture a childhood taste from Johor Bahru. The initial location disappointed—seniors preferred stronger flavours like char kway teow—but younger diners embraced the dish. When One Punggol Hawker Centre opened, Tan applied without knowing what the operators wanted. She was invited to a taste test and won a stall. Now Hakka Leipopo operates five locations across Singapore, four in hawker centres registered under her and her husband's names, plus one in a Plaza Singapura foodcourt. She is deliberate about expansion, settling into each new location before moving to the next, driven by a desire to show younger Singaporeans that Hakka tradition is not just for the elderly. "If we don't attract younger customers, this tradition might die out," she says.

Derek Cheong, the 29-year-old MasterChef Singapore winner behind Berempah Bros, chose his locations with similar care. Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre appealed to him because it had strong marketing and lacked a signature offering. Woodleigh Village attracted him for its young population. The economics are straightforward: a hawker stall costs about $25,000 to open, while a restaurant requires $200,000 to $500,000. Hawker centres also sit near MRT stations, making them accessible to ordinary people. But Cheong conducts random quality checks at his outlets weekly, acutely aware that rapid expansion can erode the very thing that made the brand worth expanding. "Food is subjective," he says, "but as a general guideline, if the food gets tastier, I consider it a good job."

The Eng Kee Chicken Wings family runs what they call a tight ship. Nicholas Lim, a 28-year-old who now operates a stall at Buangkok Hawker Centre, spent a month learning how to marinate the brand's famous wings under his uncle's instruction before being allowed to contribute to daily operations. "Our biggest challenge is maintaining consistency and quality across the outlets," he says. The brand started growing around 2022 after opening its fourth outlet, when family members finally provided enough labour to expand at full speed. They have since experimented with cafes but remain committed to opening more hawker stalls, bringing what Lim calls an old-school style of cooking to neighbourhoods.

The NEA acknowledges that hawkers use family members to circumvent the two-stall rule, and it permits this as long as relatives personally operate their stalls. The agency does not restrict franchising or limit how many stalls a brand may operate, provided registered stallholders meet tenancy requirements by personally running their businesses. Yet one prominent brand withdrew from an interview with The Straits Times when the conversation turned to the mechanics of its expansion, declining to create "the impression that we have a backdoor to these things." That hesitation speaks volumes. Derek Cheong is blunt: securing another stall is "100 per cent" easier once you have already set up shop in a hawker centre run by the same operator. "The more people you know, the more doors you'll open," says his business partner Ong Zhen Ning. Operators confirm that established brands with proven track records have a competitive advantage, though they insist all applicants receive fair consideration. Eng Kee Chicken Wings applied unsuccessfully for a stall at Punggol Coast Hawker Centre despite operating at Anchorvale Village Hawker Centre, also run by FairPrice Group. King Grouper Fish Soup, with over 30 outlets, similarly lost out at Punggol Coast. Jennifer Chew, head of operations, wonders if the operator feared the brand would appear to monopolise the area.

The data reveals the extent of the overlap. Across seven FairPrice-run socially conscious enterprise hawker centres, between 21 and 38 per cent of stalls are repeat brands found in other centres. At three of four Fei Siong-run centres, the recurrence rate exceeds 33 per cent. Ci Yuan Hawker Centre is the outlier, sharing only about 11 per cent of brands with other Fei Siong centres. By comparison, NEA-run hawker centres show lower overlap rates: Golden Mile Food Centre at 15.7 per cent, Chomp Chomp at 18.5 per cent, ABC Brickworks at 16 per cent. K.F. Seetoh, the veteran food critic and Makansutra founder, can name six to eight brands he keeps seeing everywhere. "I can easily name you six to eight brands that I keep seeing around, off the top of my head," he says. The ubiquity troubles him. "Seeing the same thing over and over again doesn't move the symphony of our hawker stalls," he observes. "New hawkers with unconventional ideas might fear opening a stall because they might think they can't survive with their type of food, and this stems evolution."

Expansion, however, carries real risk. Tommy Pang, 29, built Shi Nian Pig Leg Rice and Bai Nian Yong Tau Foo into chains with over 30 outlets islandwide in under a year at their 2021 peak. Then the crash came. After losing half a million dollars in six months, he shut nearly 20 outlets in quick succession. The problem was premature expansion without system or strategy. Multiple stalls operated in the same GrabFood delivery radius, cannibalising each other. Franchisees lacked his personal investment. "They didn't put in the same amount of effort as I did because their main goal was to get a return on their investment, whereas for me, this brand is my baby," he says. Now he relies on family and friends to run his remaining outlets and is exploring new concepts like Dudu Cantonese Cuisine. The question beneath all of this, as researcher Jenny Dorsey points out, is fundamental: What are hawker centres supposed to be? Timeless bastions of Singapore's culinary heritage, or low-barrier incubators for aspiring entrepreneurs? The two-stall rule suggests the former, yet the franchise model technically complies with regulations while violating their spirit. Some operators are trying to thread this needle. Fei Siong allocates subsidised stalls to young hawkers serving heritage dishes, pairing them with mentorship and marketing support. Canopy Hawkers Group assists first-timers with regulatory applications. Seetoh proposes an academy to teach hawkers different business models, from single outlets to chains of 20. The conversation is not about stopping successful hawkers from succeeding. It is about making room for both new and established players, and deciding what kind of food culture Singapore wants to preserve.

Seeing the same thing over and over again doesn't move the symphony of our hawker stalls. New hawkers with unconventional ideas might fear opening a stall because they might think they can't survive with their type of food, and this stems evolution.
— K.F. Seetoh, food critic and Makansutra founder
Our biggest challenge is maintaining consistency and quality across the outlets.
— Nicholas Lim, Eng Kee Chicken Wings operator
Fale Conosco FAQ