In Paris — a city that has long served as a stage for humanity's grandest arguments about itself — Pope Leo stood before UNESCO and asked a question older than any algorithm: what does it mean to be human when the tools we build begin to resemble us? His warning was not against technology itself, but against the ancient temptation to let power outrun wisdom, to optimize the world while forgetting the dignity of those who live in it. Eighty years after the founding of UNESCO, born from the ruins of a war that showed what science without conscience could do, the pontiff urged the world's institu
Pope warns AI must serve humanity, not become tool of 'domination' at UNESCO speech
Intelligence attributed to machines, dignity denied to humans
Mark
So the Pope is saying technology itself is the problem, or is it how we're using it?
Mimi
He's careful about that distinction. He's not saying machines are inherently evil. He's saying that when we build them without an ethical foundation—when we treat human life as a commodity rather than a gift—the technology amplifies that corruption. It becomes a tool of domination.
Luke
But he doesn't really specify what that ethical foundation looks like, does he? Or who decides what it is? That's where it gets vague.
Mimi
True. He's speaking as a moral authority, not as a technologist or policy maker. He's naming the problem—the dehumanization, the efficiency metrics—and calling for shared ethical grounding. The specifics would have to come from others.
Mark
He mentions that people are being "rejected and discarded" when they're no longer productive. Is he talking about AI replacing workers, or something broader?
Mimi
I think it's broader. He's talking about how a society that measures human worth by productivity will inevitably discard those who don't produce—the elderly, the disabled, the unemployed. AI accelerates that logic, but it didn't invent it.
Luke
The speech was at UNESCO, which is an institution he himself says is in crisis. How much weight does his warning carry if the very bodies meant to implement ethical frameworks are losing effectiveness?
Mimi
That's the tension he's naming, actually. He's not pretending UNESCO has all the answers. He's saying we need to restore trust in dialogue itself, in the possibility that institutions can work. It's a call to rebuild, not a declaration that the system is already broken beyond repair.
Mark
What about his criticism of world leaders treating law as a commodity? Is he naming specific countries?
Luke
He's not naming names, but the implication is clear enough. He's talking about leaders who use law instrumentally—invoke it when convenient, ignore it when inconvenient. That's a pretty direct critique of how power actually operates in several places right now.
Mimi
And he connects it back to corruption of the heart. He's saying you can't fix the law without fixing the people who make and enforce it. That's a spiritual diagnosis of a political problem.
Mark
So what's the actual ask here? What does he want to happen?
Mimi
He wants technology developed with wisdom, not just capability. He wants dialogue and diplomacy prioritized over domination. He wants people to recognize human dignity as something that can't be measured by efficiency. It's a reorientation of values.
Luke
But none of that is new. Philosophers and ethicists have been saying this for years. The question is whether a papal warning changes anything about how AI is actually being built and deployed right now.
O Pulso
- The urgency is existential: as machines are granted the language of human faculties, actual human beings are increasingly measured by the cold metrics of productivity and discarded when they fall short.
- The disruption runs deeper than technology — it corrodes the architecture of trust itself, as global communication accelerates while truth thins out and dialogue hardens into performance.
- International institutions are fracturing under the weight of leaders who invoke the rule of law when convenient and abandon it when it constrains them, turning justice into a transaction.
- The Pope reached for the Tower of Babel not as ancient myth but as live warning: unchecked power, whether technological or geopolitical, tends to collapse under the inhumanity it generates.
- Against this, Leo offered not retreat but what he called realistic hope — the stubborn conviction that the good being sought is always, still, attainable — as his pilgrimage carried that message to Notre Dame, Lourdes, and Metz.
In Paris — a city that has long served as a stage for humanity's grandest arguments about itself — Pope Leo stood before UNESCO and asked a question older than any algorithm: what does it mean to be human when the tools we build begin to resemble us? His warning was not against technology itself, but against the ancient temptation to let power outrun wisdom, to optimize the world while forgetting the dignity of those who live in it. Eighty years after the founding of UNESCO, born from the ruins of a war that showed what science without conscience could do, the pontiff urged the world's institutions to remember that intelligence — artificial or otherwise — is only as humane as the values that guide it.
Pope Leo arrived in Paris for the first papal visit to France in eighteen years carrying a pointed question at its center: what does it mean to be human in an age that increasingly attributes intelligence to machines while judging human lives by their efficiency?
Speaking at UNESCO, he began with the body — with the fact of human vulnerability, of being born naked and dependent, in need of bread and words and care. This condition, he argued, is not incidental to how we build our technologies. When life comes to be understood not as a gift but as a commodity to be optimized, the technologies we create will reflect that reframing. A world that grants intelligence to computational systems while discarding people deemed no longer productive risks becoming, in his phrase, a paradise of machines and a wasteland of human purpose.
His concern extended to the broader infrastructure of global communication. Technology without shared ethical foundations, he warned, multiplies false information and empties language of meaning. Communication has grown faster, but speed is not truth, and abundance of information is not wisdom. The result is dialogue hindered rather than deepened.
He turned then to the crisis of international institutions, where some nations now treat multilateral dialogue as obstacle rather than opportunity. What the world needs, he said, is trust — trust that difference is not threat, that honest exchange can achieve more than unilateral force. But trust cannot survive where the rule of law is treated as a tool of convenience, invoked by the powerful when it serves them and discarded when it does not.
Invoking the Tower of Babel, he named the recurring temptation: the presumption of unchecked power, whether in the form of technological monopoly, neocolonialism, or ideological imposition. Empires have always revelled in dominance before being consumed by it. The pattern, he suggested, is not history — it is a live warning.
Yet he closed not in despair but in what he called realistic hope: not the optimism that ignores difficulty, but the perseverance to believe the desired good remains attainable. His four-day pilgrimage would continue to Notre Dame, Lourdes, and Metz, with up to a million people expected across the weekend's events.
Pope Leo arrived in Paris on the first papal visit to France in eighteen years with a stark warning about the trajectory of artificial intelligence and technological progress. Speaking at UNESCO in mid-afternoon, he framed the question of what it means to be human as the central challenge of our moment—one that every culture, every form of knowledge, every art and religion must confront anew, even in the twenty-first century.
The pontiff grounded his argument in a simple observation about human vulnerability. We are born naked and dependent, he said, in need of bread and words and care. Yet as we mature, we risk forgetting this fundamental condition. Humanity becomes betrayed or cast aside, exploited or deceived. Life itself shifts from being understood as a gift—a summons to care and responsibility—into something else entirely: a commodity to be extracted, a product to be optimized. This reframing, he suggested, is not incidental to how we build our technologies. It is foundational to how we will use them.
He drew a line from the Second World War, when humanity learned that scientific progress severed from wisdom could become an instrument of destruction. Eighty years later, UNESCO's founding charter still stands on that recognition. But the nature of the threat has evolved. Machines now perform tasks once done by human hands and minds. Artificial systems have been given names borrowed from human faculties—intelligence itself. The paradox, he warned, is stark: while we attribute intelligence to computational systems, we struggle to recognize the inalienable dignity of human persons. Their lives are judged by efficiency. When they are deemed no longer productive, they are rejected and discarded. A paradise of machines, he called it, risks becoming a wasteland of human purpose.
The Pope's concern extended beyond AI to the broader architecture of global communication and power. Technology must remain at the service of humans, he insisted, not become another instrument of domination and injustice. Without a shared ethical foundation, the many channels of communication risk multiplying false information and giving currency to words devoid of meaning. Communication has become faster, he observed, but not necessarily more truthful. Information is abundant, but abundance is not wisdom. The result, he warned, is dialogue hindered rather than fostered.
He also addressed the crisis of effectiveness facing international institutions. Some countries now view dialogue as an obstacle to action, a charade rather than a genuine attempt to resolve differences. The world needs what seems greatly desired but rarely found: the virtue of trust. Trust that differences do not constitute a threat. Trust that honest dialogue can achieve more than individual nations acting alone. Yet this trust cannot exist where the rule of law itself has been corrupted. He criticized world leaders who invoke law when it serves their interests and disregard it when it restrains them, treating justice itself as a commodity to be bought and sold. Without truth, language becomes subject to the logic of violence and the arbitrary will of the powerful.
The Pope invoked the Tower of Babel as a metaphor for the temptation of unchecked power. The more power seeks to oppress, the more it weakens itself, exposing its inhumane face. Many empires have revelled in their power before being consumed by it and collapsing. Today, he said, this temptation reappears in globalization pursued without fraternity and in rapacious forms of neocolonialism and ideological imposition. The presumption of making oneself like God and subjecting peoples to a single yoke leads only to confusion of languages, to failure to understand one another.
Yet he ended not with despair but with a call to action grounded in what he called realistic hope. Every people has a precious part to play in the pursuit of authentic human progress, which peace alone can guarantee. This is not naive optimism that ignores difficulties, he said, but rather the perseverance to believe that the desired good is always attainable. His four-day pilgrimage would continue with visits to Notre Dame Cathedral, Lourdes, and Metz, with up to a million people expected to attend the events across the weekend.
Citações Notáveis
Our efforts in this domain must ensure that new technologies remain at the service of the human person, rather than becoming yet another instrument of domination and injustice.— Pope Leo, at UNESCO
While intelligence is attributed to computational systems, we struggle to recognise the inalienable dignity of human persons whose lives are judged according to the criterion of efficiency and, when deemed no longer productive, the rejected and discarded.— Pope Leo, at UNESCO
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em The Guardian ↗
Technology