In Palm Springs, ninety-five students received scholarships this year from an unlikely benefactor: their local police department, partnering with the nonprofit Do the Right Thing. The gesture is small in the ledger of systemic change, yet significant in what it signals — that institutions long defined by enforcement are searching for a different way to be present in young people's lives. Across the country, police departments are experimenting with models that lead with investment rather than suspicion, asking whether trust can be built one recognized student at a time.
Police departments partner with nonprofits to build trust through youth scholarships
Showing up with scholarships instead of citations
Mark
So the Palm Springs police department is giving out scholarships now? That seems like a pretty significant pivot from what we typically think of as police work.
Mimi
It's a partnership with a nonprofit called Do the Right Thing. The police don't fund it alone—they identify students who are doing good work, and the organization awards the scholarships. Ninety-five students got them this year in Palm Springs.
Luke
Do we know the dollar amounts? Is this meaningful money or symbolic?
Mimi
The source doesn't specify the scholarship amounts, which is a real gap. We know the number of awards but not their scale.
Mark
What's the theory behind this? Why would a police department think scholarships are part of their job?
Mimi
It's about relationship-building. If young people in a community see police as people who invest in their futures rather than just enforce rules, it changes the dynamic. It's part of what departments call "changing the culture."
Luke
That's the stated goal, but do we have evidence it actually works? Does this program measurably improve community trust or reduce crime?
Mimi
The source doesn't provide outcome data. We know the program exists and is operating in multiple cities, but not whether it's achieving those goals.
Mark
So this is happening in other places too?
Mimi
Do the Right Thing has chapters across the country, though Palm Springs is the one specifically mentioned here. It's part of a broader movement toward community-centered policing.
Luke
Is this replacing traditional policing or supplementing it? Because there's a difference between a department that gives scholarships and one that's actually changed how it polices.
Mimi
That's the real question, isn't it? The source frames it as a cultural shift, but we don't know if it's changing enforcement practices or just adding a good-will program on top of existing ones.
Le Pouls
- Decades of fractured relationships between law enforcement and low-income communities have created a trust deficit that enforcement alone cannot repair.
- Ninety-five Palm Springs students — most from families without substantial resources — received scholarships through a police-backed nonprofit, turning a precinct into a patron of possibility.
- The Do the Right Thing program operates nationally, identifying students of strong character and connecting them with financial support for college or vocational training.
- Police departments are under pressure to move beyond reactive, adversarial policing, and scholarship initiatives represent one concrete experiment in that cultural shift.
- The program lands as both a financial lifeline for recipients and a symbolic statement: that officers can choose to see young people as community assets rather than problems to manage.
In Palm Springs, ninety-five students received scholarships this year from an unlikely benefactor: their local police department, partnering with the nonprofit Do the Right Thing. The gesture is small in the ledger of systemic change, yet significant in what it signals — that institutions long defined by enforcement are searching for a different way to be present in young people's lives. Across the country, police departments are experimenting with models that lead with investment rather than suspicion, asking whether trust can be built one recognized student at a time.
In Palm Springs this year, ninety-five students opened letters telling them someone had decided to invest in their futures. That someone was the police department, working alongside a nonprofit called Do the Right Thing — an organization with chapters across the country that partners with law enforcement to identify and reward students demonstrating character and commitment despite real obstacles. For most of these young people, from families without substantial resources, the scholarships meant the difference between a deferred dream and a real path forward.
The program's premise is straightforward: recognize students doing good work, academically or civically, and back that recognition with money for college or vocational training. But the architecture underneath carries weight. Police departments in many American communities have long operated as enforcers first and neighbors second, and their relationships with young people in economically disadvantaged areas have too often been built on stops and suspicion rather than investment and belief.
The Palm Springs initiative is a deliberate attempt to rewire that dynamic. Showing up with scholarships instead of citations, officers are signaling that they see these students as assets — each of the ninety-five awards a statement that someone in uniform believes in a young person's potential enough to help fund it. This sits within a broader reckoning across departments experimenting with community policing, mentorship, and mental health response — all attempts to move from an us-versus-them framework toward shared investment.
For recipients, the benefit is immediate and tangible: tuition, books, housing — the things that make college possible for families living paycheck to paycheck. But there is also something symbolic in being chosen by a police department for recognition. It says: we see you, you belong, you matter here. Whether scholarships alone can meaningfully shift the deeper relationship between law enforcement and underserved communities remains an open question — they cannot erase systemic inequality or the lived weight of over-policing. But they represent one concrete way institutions can choose to show up differently.
In Palm Springs, ninety-five students opened acceptance letters this year knowing that someone had decided to invest in their futures. The money came through an unlikely source: the police department, working alongside a nonprofit called Do the Right Thing. The organization, which operates chapters across the country, exists to recognize and reward students who demonstrate character and commitment despite the obstacles in their way. For these ninety-five young people, most from families without substantial resources, the scholarships meant the difference between a dream deferred and a path forward.
Do the Right Thing operates on a straightforward premise: police departments and community organizations identify students who are doing good work—academically, civically, or both—and the program honors that effort with financial support for college or vocational training. It is, in structure, a simple transaction. But the architecture underneath carries weight. Police departments have spent decades in many American communities as enforcers first and neighbors second. The relationship between law enforcement and young people in economically disadvantaged areas has often been fractured, built on stops and suspicion rather than recognition and investment.
The Palm Springs initiative represents a deliberate attempt to rewire that dynamic. By showing up not with citations or warnings but with scholarships and public recognition, officers are trying to demonstrate that they see these young people as assets to their community, not problems to be managed. The ninety-five awards distributed in Palm Springs are concrete evidence of that shift—each one a statement that someone in uniform believes in a student's potential enough to help fund it.
This kind of partnership between police and nonprofits reflects a broader reckoning happening in departments across the country. The traditional model of policing—reactive, enforcement-focused, often adversarial in low-income neighborhoods—has proven insufficient for building the kind of trust that actually makes communities safer. Departments are experimenting with different approaches: community policing, youth mentorship programs, mental health response teams. The scholarship model sits within that landscape as a tool for what some departments call "changing the culture"—shifting from an us-versus-them framework to one built on shared investment in young people's success.
For the students receiving these scholarships, the immediate benefit is tangible: money for tuition, books, housing, the things that make college possible for families living paycheck to paycheck. But there is also a symbolic dimension. Being selected by a police department to receive recognition and support sends a message about belonging and possibility. It says: we see you, we believe in you, you matter to this community.
The Palm Springs chapter's distribution of ninety-five scholarships in a single year suggests the program has gained real traction in that community. It is not a token gesture—it is a substantial commitment of resources and attention. Whether this kind of initiative can meaningfully shift the relationship between police and young people in underserved neighborhoods remains an open question. Scholarships alone do not solve systemic inequality or erase the lived experience of over-policing. But they represent one concrete way that institutions can choose to show up differently, to invest in young people's futures rather than simply manage their present.
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur CBS News ↗
Crime & Justice