In the crowded arena of budget smartphones, Xiaomi's Poco X3 Pro enters as a capable but conflicted contender — a device that does much right yet cannot escape the shadow of its own sibling. Priced under $300 and armed with a powerful chipset and exceptional battery life, it represents genuine value, yet the existence of the Poco F3 at a similar price forces an uncomfortable question about who this phone is truly for. It is a story as old as markets themselves: a good thing made lesser not by its own failings, but by the presence of something better standing just beside it.
Poco X3 Pro review: Solid budget phone overshadowed by better Poco F3
A good phone trapped between two price points
Mark
So the X3 Pro is good, but the F3 is better at the same price. Why would anyone buy this one?
Mimi
Battery life is genuinely exceptional—two days easily, sometimes two and a half. And it has a headphone jack, which the F3 doesn't. If those things matter to you, the X3 Pro makes sense.
Luke
But how much better is the F3's performance? The source says the X3 Pro is "faster than the Pixel 4 XL." That's a real claim, but it's also comparing to a 2019 phone. We don't get a direct F3 comparison.
Mimi
Fair point. The source doesn't give us the exact performance gap between them. It just says the F3 has "enough leaps in performance" to make it the smarter choice.
Mark
What about the display? Is it actually bad?
Mimi
It's not bad, it's just compromised. 120Hz LCD instead of AMOLED, so blacks look gray, there's light bleed in corners, and you see ghosting when scrolling fast. But for under $300, it's acceptable.
Luke
The source says "it's not a dealbreaker" multiple times. That's the reviewer's judgment, not a fact. Someone who cares deeply about display quality might find it genuinely frustrating.
Mimi
Absolutely. The camera is where the real weakness shows. It's described as "middling" and "slap bang in the middle of the road." That's not a strong point.
Mark
Is there anything this phone does better than the F3?
Mimi
The headphone jack and battery life are the main differentiators. Also, the design is subjective—some people will love the chunky form factor and the bold Steel Blue color.
Luke
The source doesn't actually tell us if the F3 has worse battery life. We're inferring that the X3 Pro's strength is battery, but we don't have a direct comparison.
Mark
So it's a phone for a very specific buyer.
Mimi
Exactly. Someone who values battery life and a headphone jack over the latest performance and design refinements. That's a real person, but it's a narrower audience than Xiaomi probably hoped for.
Le Pouls
- The Poco X3 Pro enters a brutally competitive budget segment where every dollar is scrutinized and every compromise is magnified.
- Its chunky polycarbonate build, mediocre LCD display, and underwhelming camera system create real friction for buyers expecting more at this price point.
- Xiaomi counters with a Snapdragon 860 chipset that outpaces phones costing twice as much, and a 5,120mAh battery that comfortably survives two full days of use.
- The phone attempts to carve its niche through stamina, a retained headphone jack, and raw performance — but the strategy feels incomplete.
- The Poco F3, nearly identical in price, offers superior performance and design, quietly pulling the rug from under the X3 Pro's value proposition.
- The X3 Pro lands as a capable fallback rather than a confident recommendation — useful, but not the phone Xiaomi should be championing.
In the crowded arena of budget smartphones, Xiaomi's Poco X3 Pro enters as a capable but conflicted contender — a device that does much right yet cannot escape the shadow of its own sibling. Priced under $300 and armed with a powerful chipset and exceptional battery life, it represents genuine value, yet the existence of the Poco F3 at a similar price forces an uncomfortable question about who this phone is truly for. It is a story as old as markets themselves: a good thing made lesser not by its own failings, but by the presence of something better standing just beside it.
Xiaomi's Poco X3 Pro is a budget phone caught in an uncomfortable position — solid enough to respect, but difficult to recommend without hesitation. Its polycarbonate body is chunky and recognizable, sharing its DNA with the earlier X3 NFC. The Steel Blue finish is visually striking, though the thick frame becomes unwieldy with a case, and button placement — particularly a mushy, high-mounted power key — is a genuine annoyance. The fingerprint scanner embedded within it, however, is fast and reliable.
The 120Hz LCD display is a double-edged offering. Scrolling feels smooth, but the panel struggles with brightness, produces grayish blacks, and shows light bleed in corners during dark content. Ghosting appears under fast motion. Stereo speakers and a 3.5mm headphone jack are welcome inclusions that many competitors have quietly abandoned.
Where the X3 Pro earns genuine admiration is performance. The Snapdragon 860 — essentially an overclocked 855+ — punches well above its price class, outbenchmarking Google's Pixel 4 XL. Gaming is smooth, daily use is snappy, and MIUI 12, while not universally loved, is feature-rich. Aggressive background app management is the main software quirk, though it rarely disrupts real-world use.
The cameras are the weakest chapter. The 48-megapixel main sensor handles good light adequately, but the ultrawide is soft, colors trend toward oversaturation, and Xiaomi has inexplicably capped video at 4K 30fps despite the chipset supporting more. Battery life, by contrast, is exceptional — two full days under heavy use, with a 33W charger restoring it in under two hours.
The X3 Pro's true adversary isn't a rival brand — it's the Poco F3, which offers better performance and design at nearly the same price. For buyers who prize battery endurance and a headphone jack above all else, the X3 Pro remains a worthy option. For everyone else, the smarter path leads elsewhere.
Xiaomi's Poco X3 Pro arrives as a capable budget phone caught in an awkward middle ground. It's a solid device that does most things well, but it exists in the shadow of a better alternative—the Poco F3—that costs roughly the same and delivers more.
The phone itself is a chunky, weighty device that feels good in the hand despite being made primarily of polycarbonate. The Steel Blue model is visually striking, with soft satin sides interrupted by a brighter blue strip running down the back where the Poco logo sits embossed. The design is instantly recognizable if you've seen the earlier X3 NFC, with only minor refinements. The phone is thick enough that adding a protective case makes it even more unwieldy. Button placement is a genuine frustration—the volume rocker sits too high on the upper right side, and the power button feels mushy and cheap, though it does house a fast and accurate fingerprint scanner.
The display is a 120Hz LCD panel, which Xiaomi has pushed aggressively even into its budget lines. This is both a strength and a weakness. The higher refresh rate makes scrolling smooth, but the LCD technology itself has familiar limitations. It doesn't get as bright as competitors, and blacks look more like deep grays. Light bleed appears in the corners when viewing dark content, and there's noticeable ghosting when scrolling quickly. For the price, these aren't dealbreakers, but they're visible compromises. The phone does include stereo speakers—a bottom-firing speaker paired with the earpiece—and mercifully retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, something increasingly rare.
Performance is where the X3 Pro shines. The Snapdragon 860 chipset is essentially a rebranded and overclocked Snapdragon 855+, which means it's not quite flagship-level but still remarkably capable. The phone benchmarks faster than Google's Pixel 4 XL, a feat that's genuinely impressive for a device priced well under $300. Gaming runs smoothly at high settings, and day-to-day performance is snappy. Xiaomi's MIUI 12 software is feature-rich if not everyone's first choice for an Android skin. The main software quirk is aggressive background app culling to preserve battery life, but this rarely causes real problems in practice.
The camera system is the weakest link. The 48-megapixel main sensor produces solid shots in good light, but the overall setup is middling for the price segment. The 8-megapixel ultrawide produces noticeably softer images, and there's visible digital sharpening when you crop in. Colors can be oversaturated. Video recording tops out at 4K 30fps, a limitation that seems arbitrary given the chipset's capability to handle 4K 60fps—Xiaomi simply hasn't enabled the option.
Battery life is exceptional. The 5,120mAh cell easily lasts two days under heavy use, and can stretch to two and a half days with lighter usage. The 33W charger isn't the fastest available, but it refills the battery in under two hours from near-empty, which is acceptable for someone who doesn't want to charge daily.
The real problem is context. The Poco X3 Pro is a genuinely good phone, but the Poco F3 exists at nearly the same price point with meaningfully better performance and design. For someone hunting the absolute best value, the F3 is the smarter choice. That said, if you specifically want longer battery life, a headphone jack, and don't mind the thicker form factor, the X3 Pro remains a capable option that delivers impressive specs for the money. It's just not the phone Xiaomi should be pushing hardest.
Citations marquantes
The result is a great smartphone that may be labelled 'Pro' but ends up coming across more 'Lite' in execution.— Reviewer's assessment
If you simply must have the best bang for your buck, then I suggest looking squarely at the Poco F3.— Reviewer's recommendation
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur 9to5Google ↗
Economy & Finance