Philippines condemns 'racist' Chinese AI video depicting it as abused monkey

Chinese Coast Guard water cannon attacks on Philippine vessels have caused injuries and property damage in disputed waters.
The video signals Beijing has abandoned even the pretense of diplomatic restraint.
As China escalates its campaign against the Philippines over disputed South China Sea territory.
Mark

Why does a propaganda video matter? It's just an image, not a military action.

Mimi

Because it signals a shift in how Beijing is willing to conduct itself. For years, the dispute was framed in legal and diplomatic language. Now they're openly mocking the Philippines as subhuman—that's a different kind of aggression. It prepares the ground for worse.

Mark

Prepares the ground how?

Mimi

When you've already dehumanized someone in the eyes of your own population, it becomes easier to justify harsher actions against them. The video isn't the threat itself. It's the permission structure.

Mark

But the Philippines has the Hague ruling on its side. Doesn't that matter?

Mimi

It mattered in 2016. Now it's just a piece of paper. Beijing ignored it then and ignores it now. The ruling had no enforcement mechanism, no teeth. What matters now is who controls the water and who's willing to use force.

Mark

So the video is China saying what, exactly?

Mimi

That they don't care what the international court said. That they'll do what they want. And that they're comfortable humiliating the Philippines publicly while doing it. That's new.

Mark

What happens next?

Mimi

The water cannons keep firing. The barriers go up and down. And the rhetoric gets darker. Once you've called someone a monkey, the next step is easier.

  • China Daily's AI video depicting Filipinos as a monkey being water-cannoned into the sea has ignited a formal diplomatic crisis, with Manila calling it racist propaganda unworthy of any responsible state.
  • The video's release was timed to coincide with the tenth anniversary of a Hague ruling that Beijing has spent a decade ignoring — turning a legal milestone into an occasion for public humiliation.
  • Physical confrontations in disputed waters have grown increasingly dangerous, with Chinese Coast Guard vessels deploying water cannons against Philippine ships and crews reportedly armed with bladed weapons.
  • Manila's foreign and defence ministries have demanded the video's removal and condemned it as moral and intellectual bankruptcy — but the clip remains online and Chinese authorities have offered no response.
  • The escalation suggests Beijing has abandoned even the appearance of diplomatic restraint, replacing it with a sustained campaign of mockery that frames the Philippines as a foreign-manipulated pawn rather than a sovereign claimant.

Ten years after an international tribunal invalidated China's sweeping claims to the South China Sea, Beijing has chosen not quiet defiance but public mockery — publishing an AI-generated video that reduces the Philippines to a monkey, cast into the sea it dares to claim. The image is crude, but its meaning is precise: it signals that diplomatic restraint has been set aside in favor of dehumanization as statecraft. In the long arc of territorial disputes, the moment a nation reaches for caricature rather than argument, something more than a boundary is being contested.

On July 10th, China Daily published an AI-generated video that depicted the Philippines as a monkey in a Filipino shirt, forced onto a karaoke stage by arms waving Japanese and American flags, before being thrown into the ocean and blasted by a water cannon. Manila responded with fury, calling the clip dehumanizing and racist — and the condemnation reached beyond mere offense. The video was not an isolated act but part of a sustained campaign: China Daily's social media had already run cartoons casting the Philippines as a clown, a snake, and a helpless creature in someone else's geopolitical game.

The timing carried its own message. This week marked ten years since the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague ruled that China's territorial claims in the South China Sea had no basis in international law. Beijing rejected the verdict then and continues to reject it now. For a decade, the ruling has been a legal victory that changed nothing on the water.

The disputed waters — centered on the Spratly Islands and Scarborough Shoal, barely 100 miles from the Philippine coast — have become a theater of escalating confrontation. Chinese Coast Guard vessels routinely deploy water cannons against Philippine ships, causing injuries and damage. In June, Beijing installed a floating barrier at Scarborough Shoal and barred Philippine Defence Secretary Gilbert Teodoro and his family from entering Chinese territory.

Manila's foreign ministry issued a formal condemnation, calling the video a departure from responsible statecraft and demanding its removal. The defence ministry went further, calling it contemptible propaganda exposing the moral bankruptcy of Beijing's information machine. Teodoro himself described the behavior as schizophrenic — a word that conveyed not just anger but genuine bewilderment at the pace of escalation.

China Daily's caption framed the arbitration award as a source of confrontation rather than resolution, casting the Philippines as a pawn of foreign powers and Beijing as the aggrieved defender of its own interests. The inversion was complete: the nation wielding water cannons and AI mockery presented itself as the victim.

What the video signals is less about its content than its context. Crude propaganda is not new, but this campaign suggests Beijing has discarded even the pretense of diplomatic decorum. The legal path to resolution has been closed by Beijing's refusal to acknowledge it. Physical standoffs at sea grow more frequent and more dangerous. And as the anniversary of the Hague ruling passes, China's answer is not silence but public dehumanization. The video remains online. The waters remain contested.

On July 10th, China Daily published an artificial intelligence video that reduced an entire nation to a caricature: a monkey dressed in a Filipino shirt, screaming as it was shoved onto a makeshift karaoke stage by arms waving Japanese and American flags. The creature sang the wrong song, pulled out a document labeled "South China Sea arbitration award," and was promptly hurled into the ocean and blasted by a water cannon. The Philippines responded with fury, calling the clip dehumanizing and racist—a characterization that cuts to something deeper than mere insult. The video was not an isolated provocation but one frame in a sustained campaign of mockery: China Daily's Facebook page had become a gallery of cartoons depicting Manila as a clown, a snake, and now a helpless animal being bullied by larger powers.

The timing was deliberate. This week marked ten years since the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague ruled decisively that China's sweeping territorial claims in the South China Sea had no foundation in international law. Beijing rejected the verdict then and has continued to reject it now, insisting the tribunal had no authority to judge the matter. For a decade, the ruling has hung in the air between the two countries—a legal victory for the Philippines that has changed nothing on the water.

The South China Sea dispute centers on two contested areas: the Spratly Islands and Scarborough Shoal, which sits just over 100 miles from the Philippine coast but 500 miles from China. These waters have become a theater of escalating confrontation. Chinese Coast Guard vessels routinely deploy high-pressure water cannons against Philippine ships operating in the disputed zones, causing injuries and structural damage. In recent months, the tensions have grown sharper. In June, Beijing installed a floating barrier at the entrance to Scarborough Shoal—a blockade that the Philippines protested diplomatically until it was removed. That same month, China barred the Philippine defence secretary, Gilbert Teodoro, and his family from entering mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau.

Manila's foreign ministry issued a formal statement condemning what it called a departure from responsible statecraft. "Disagreement over legal and political issues does not justify resorting to disturbing imagery, which has no place in the civil public discourse of a responsible state," the ministry said, demanding the video be taken down. The clip remained on Facebook. The defence ministry went further, calling the video contemptible propaganda that exposed "the moral and intellectual bankruptcy of China's propaganda machine." Teodoro himself spoke of what he termed "schizophrenic behaviour" from the Chinese Communist Party—language suggesting not just anger but bewilderment at the escalation.

China Daily's caption accompanying the monkey video restated Beijing's position with characteristic defiance. The arbitration award, it claimed, had brought no peace but only confrontation masquerading as law. The Philippines, it suggested, had become a pawn in someone else's geopolitical game, clinging to external forces and stirring up trouble. The framing inverted the narrative entirely: Beijing cast itself as the aggrieved party, defending its interests against foreign manipulation of its smaller neighbor.

What makes this moment significant is not the video itself—crude propaganda is not new—but what it signals about the deterioration of the relationship. The monkey clip is one piece of a broader rhetorical assault, a campaign of mockery that suggests Beijing has abandoned even the pretense of diplomatic restraint. Physical confrontations at sea have grown more frequent and more dangerous, with crews wielding swords, spears, and knives. The legal framework that might have resolved the dispute—the Hague ruling—has been rendered irrelevant by Beijing's refusal to acknowledge it. And now, as the anniversary of that ruling passes, China is not engaging in quiet defiance but in public humiliation, using artificial intelligence to dehumanize a neighboring state.

The Philippines has condemned the video. Chinese authorities have not responded. The clip remains online. And in the waters between the two countries, the standoffs continue.

Disagreement over legal and political issues does not justify resorting to disturbing imagery, which has no place in the civil public discourse of a responsible state.
— Philippines foreign ministry
The video exposes the moral and intellectual bankruptcy of China's propaganda machine.
— Philippine defence ministry
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en BBC News ↗
Contáctanos FAQ