Pentagon revokes Kendall's clearance over alleged Air Force One disclosure

No one has said anything to me about what I'm asserted to have revealed
Kendall's response to the Pentagon's classified disclosure allegation, emphasizing the vagueness of the accusation against him.
Mark

Why would a former Air Force Secretary risk his clearance by talking to reporters about a plane?

Mimi

That's the question, isn't it. Kendall says he didn't. But the reporting was real—the Times did write about the new plane's gaps. Someone was talking.

Mark

So either he's lying, or someone else was the source?

Mimi

Or the Pentagon is being imprecise about what counts as classified. Kendall was careful to say he only discussed things he believed were already public knowledge.

Mark

But the Pentagon says he disclosed classified information. That's a specific allegation.

Mimi

It is. But they won't say what he allegedly revealed or to whom. That's what makes Kendall's denial so pointed—he can't defend himself against a charge with no details.

Mark

Is this about the plane itself, or about something else?

Mimi

It's about control. The new plane is a political gift from Qatar, and it has real vulnerabilities. Someone needed to explain why the President switched planes during a crisis. Kendall may have been trying to provide context.

Mark

And now he's the one being punished?

Mimi

His clearance is gone. Whether he faces prosecution is still unknown. The administration has shown it will move quickly against officials who talk.

  • Kendall's clearance was revoked without anyone telling him what he allegedly revealed — leaving him to defend himself against an accusation with no specified charge.
  • The Pentagon's move follows reporting that exposed serious defensive gaps in the new Qatar-donated Air Force One, raising the question of whether the government is punishing the messenger rather than addressing the vulnerability.
  • A credible missile plot against the presidential aircraft forced the Secret Service to quietly swap Trump back onto the older, better-defended plane — a security failure the administration has been reluctant to acknowledge publicly.
  • The Trump administration has now revoked clearances from 38 former officials, suggesting a deliberate campaign to silence or sideline critics from the national security establishment.
  • Whether Kendall faces criminal prosecution under the Espionage Act remains unresolved — his case now suspended in the charged space between accusation and consequence.

Frank Kendall, who led the Air Force under President Biden, found himself stripped of his security clearance on Friday — accused by the Pentagon of revealing classified details about Air Force One's defensive vulnerabilities to journalists. Kendall, now a private citizen, denied the allegations with genuine bewilderment, noting that no one had told him what he was supposed to have disclosed. The episode unfolds against a larger pattern of the Trump administration revoking clearances of former officials, and against the unresolved story of a Qatari-donated presidential aircraft rushed into service before its defenses were complete — a story whose telling, it seems, has now become its own controversy.

Frank Kendall, who served as Air Force Secretary under President Biden, learned Friday that his security clearance had been revoked. The Pentagon alleged he had disclosed classified information about Air Force One's capabilities to journalists. Kendall pushed back immediately, telling the Associated Press he was bewildered — he had always been careful about what he said publicly, and no one had told him what he was actually supposed to have revealed.

The accusation arrived in the wake of reporting, including pieces in The New York Times, that examined security vulnerabilities in the new Air Force One — a Boeing 747 donated by Qatar and rushed into service after a $400 million retrofit. Those articles noted the aircraft lacked the advanced antimissile defenses of its predecessor. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell did not specify which outlet Kendall had spoken to, nor which classified details were allegedly disclosed.

The stakes behind the story are real. When tensions with Iran escalated after U.S. airstrikes and Iranian retaliatory attacks on Gulf Arab states, the Secret Service detected a credible plot to fire a missile at the presidential aircraft. Officials determined the new Qatari plane's defensive systems were not yet complete, and recommended Trump return from Turkey on the older, better-equipped Air Force One. Trump publicly denied security concerns drove the decision, though he acknowledged being a constant target. The White House later announced the Qatari aircraft would receive further upgrades over roughly a month in the fall.

In the Times reporting, Kendall had been quoted saying the accelerated schedule would not have allowed for all standard Air Force One modifications, and that he was surprised the plane had been used outside U.S. borders before those modifications were finished. He maintained Friday that he had spoken on the record precisely because he believed he had said nothing classified.

The revocation fits a broader pattern. The Trump administration stripped clearances from 37 current and former national security officials last year, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has continued the practice. Whether Kendall faces criminal prosecution under the Espionage Act remains unanswered — the Pentagon declined to say whether a referral had been made. Classified disclosure cases have carried severe consequences in the past, and Kendall's situation now waits in uncertain territory: accused, denied, and unresolved.

Frank Kendall, who served as Air Force Secretary under President Biden, woke up Friday to find his security clearance revoked. The Pentagon alleged he had disclosed classified information about Air Force One's capabilities to journalists. Kendall, now a private citizen, immediately pushed back. He told the Associated Press he was bewildered by the accusation, insisting he had always been meticulous about what he said in public and had never, to his knowledge, revealed anything classified. "No one has said anything to me about what I'm asserted to have revealed," he said, "and I can't imagine what it could be."

The revocation came on the heels of reporting last month, including pieces in The New York Times, that examined security vulnerabilities in the new Air Force One—a Boeing 747 donated by Qatar that had been rushed into service. Those articles noted that the aircraft lacked the advanced antimissile defenses of the plane it replaced. The Pentagon's spokesperson, Sean Parnell, did not specify which media outlet Kendall allegedly spoke to, nor did he detail which specific classified details were supposedly disclosed. The accusation was stark: Kendall had forfeited his eligibility to access classified information and was barred from holding any sensitive government position.

The backdrop to this dispute is the complicated recent history of Air Force One itself. The new Qatari plane underwent a $400 million retrofit and upgrade before entering service. President Trump flew it to Turkey last month for the NATO summit. But when tensions with Iran escalated—after the U.S. launched airstrikes and Tehran attacked three Gulf Arab states—the Secret Service made an urgent decision. U.S. officials had detected a credible plot to fire a missile at the presidential aircraft. Rather than risk the new plane, which was still incomplete in its defensive systems, the Secret Service recommended Trump return on the older Air Force One, equipped with secure communications and sophisticated military defenses. Trump denied to reporters that security concerns drove the swap, though he acknowledged being under constant threat and called himself Iran's "number one" target.

The White House later announced that Trump would continue using the older plane while the Qatari aircraft received "additional upgrades and enhancements" over approximately one month in the fall. In the Times article, Kendall had been quoted discussing the timeline, noting that the accelerated schedule would not have allowed for "all the normal Air Force One modifications." He expressed surprise that the plane had been used outside U.S. borders before those modifications were complete. When the Pentagon moved against him Friday, Kendall reiterated his position: he had been comfortable speaking on the record to reporters and on television about the Qatari 747 precisely because he believed he had said nothing classified.

The Air Force has maintained that the rapid conversion was done "without accepting any risk regarding security, safety, or secure communications," yet it has also acknowledged that certain capabilities differ between the two aircraft. The service acknowledged it deliberately excluded several highly complex engineering modifications from the Qatar plane, including widening certain doors and installing multiple stairs built into the hull. These omissions were intentional, not oversights.

The revocation of Kendall's clearance fits a pattern. The Trump administration revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former national security officials last year. More recently, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stripped clearances from other officials soon after taking office. What remains unclear is whether Kendall will face criminal prosecution. The Pentagon declined to say whether he had been referred for prosecution under the Espionage Act, the statute typically invoked in such cases. Historically, classified disclosure allegations have led to serious consequences: Edward Snowden was charged after revealing surveillance programs; a Massachusetts Air National Guard member received a 15-year sentence in 2024 for leaking classified military documents about Ukraine. Kendall's case now sits in that uncertain space—accused, denied, unspecified—waiting to see whether it becomes a prosecution or remains a revocation.

I've always been extremely careful to not say anything classified, and as far as I know I have not.
— Frank Kendall, former Air Force Secretary
Safeguarding classified information is a non-negotiable duty. Those who violate that trust forfeit the privilege of access and any role requiring it.
— Sean Parnell, Pentagon spokesperson
Contact Us FAQ