In the province of Pangasinan, three local governments have turned to formal petition to ask a question that should have a simple answer: where does the money go? The municipalities of Urdaneta City, Bayambang, and Malasiqui have requested that PhilHealth account for how P1,700 per beneficiary under the YAKAP primary-care program is distributed between local and provincial levels. It is a quiet but consequential act — local officials insisting that public health funds must be traceable, not merely promised, if governance is to mean anything at all.
Pangasinan LGUs demand PhilHealth clarify YAKAP program fund allocation
Without clear records, no one knows which program is actually paying
Mark
So three municipalities are asking PhilHealth to explain how it's spending P1,700 per person on primary care. What's the actual problem here?
Mimi
They can't see where the money goes. PhilHealth allocates it, but the split between what reaches the municipal level and what stays provincial is unclear in the actual records.
Luke
Do we know if PhilHealth has refused to provide the records, or are the records just confusing?
Mimi
The source doesn't say PhilHealth refused. It sounds more like the LGUs are asking for a formal accounting that makes the flow visible.
Mark
And the 20-80 split—is that the official policy or just what the LGUs think is supposed to happen?
Mimi
The source describes it as "the supposed arrangement," which suggests it's what the LGUs understand the policy to be, but they want PhilHealth to confirm it with actual numbers.
Luke
So we don't actually know if PhilHealth has acknowledged that 20-80 split or if that's just the LGUs' interpretation of the rules.
Mimi
Right. That's part of why they're asking for clarification. They want PhilHealth to explain the policy officially.
Mark
Is there any indication this is a funding shortage, or is it just a transparency issue?
Mimi
The source frames it as transparency and reconciliation, not as money missing. The LGUs say they want to ensure health services continue while getting clarity.
Luke
Which means we don't know yet whether there's actually a discrepancy in the accounts or if this is preventive—asking for documentation before a problem emerges.
Mimi
Exactly. The LGUs are being careful to say this isn't confrontational. They want the records so there's no confusion going forward.
Der Puls
- Three Pangasinan municipalities cannot determine whether PhilHealth funds or provincial money is actually paying for their residents' health services — a gap that makes local budgeting nearly impossible.
- The confusion stems from a 20/80 fund-split arrangement that, without supporting documentation, exists more on paper than in practice for the LGUs involved.
- Spokesperson Hue Jyro U. Go was deliberate in framing the petition as a call for reconciliation, not accusation — signaling that the municipalities want answers, not a standoff.
- The LGUs are demanding itemized records: beneficiary attributions, fund releases, services covered, and unspent balances — the full paper trail that accountability requires.
- The dispute is navigating toward resolution through official financial documentation, with both sides expected to align their accounts once PhilHealth opens its records.
In the province of Pangasinan, three local governments have turned to formal petition to ask a question that should have a simple answer: where does the money go? The municipalities of Urdaneta City, Bayambang, and Malasiqui have requested that PhilHealth account for how P1,700 per beneficiary under the YAKAP primary-care program is distributed between local and provincial levels. It is a quiet but consequential act — local officials insisting that public health funds must be traceable, not merely promised, if governance is to mean anything at all.
Three municipalities in Pangasinan — Urdaneta City, Bayambang, and Malasiqui — have filed a formal petition asking PhilHealth to explain how it allocates P1,700 per beneficiary under the YAKAP primary-care program. Their spokesperson, Hue Jyro U. Go, was careful to frame the request as one of clarity and reconciliation, not accusation. The LGUs are not alleging wrongdoing. They simply cannot tell, from the records available to them, how the money actually moves.
At the center of the confusion is a fund-distribution arrangement in which 20 percent of the per-beneficiary allocation is meant to reach the city and municipal level, while 80 percent flows to the province. Without transparent documentation of how that split operates in practice, local officials cannot determine whether the health services their residents receive are being paid for by PhilHealth, by the provincial government, or by some combination of both — a distinction that directly affects local budgeting and planning.
The municipalities are asking PhilHealth to provide detailed financial records: how much of the P1,700 is attributed to their specific beneficiaries, how much has been released or spent, which services have been funded, and what balances remain. Go emphasized that the goal is account reconciliation — once both sides are working from the same numbers, responsibility at each level of government becomes clear.
The petition points to a broader challenge in multilevel health financing: when funds pass through several hands without transparent tracking, local officials are left managing budgets they cannot fully see, and residents may not know which program is actually caring for them. The three Pangasinan municipalities are asking PhilHealth to close that gap by opening its books.
Three municipalities in Pangasinan have formally asked the Philippine Health Insurance Corp. to explain exactly how it is spending money meant for primary care in their communities. The request, filed by the local governments of Urdaneta City, Bayambang, and Malasiqui, centers on the YAKAP program and specifically on what happens to P1,700 per beneficiary that PhilHealth allocates for basic medical services in the province.
The three municipalities are not accusing PhilHealth of wrongdoing. Their spokesperson, Hue Jyro U. Go, was careful to frame the petition as a request for clarity and reconciliation, not confrontation. What they want is straightforward: a transparent accounting of how the money flows through the system and where it ends up. The LGUs need to know how much of that P1,700 per person is attributed to their own beneficiaries, how much goes into a pooled provincial fund, how much has actually been released or spent, which services have been funded, and what money remains unspent.
The structure of the fund distribution is at the heart of the confusion. According to the arrangement the LGUs describe, 20 percent of the P1,700 per-beneficiary allocation is supposed to reach the city and municipal level, while 80 percent flows to the provincial level. But without clear records showing how this split actually works in practice, the three municipalities cannot tell whether PhilHealth money or provincial government money is paying for the health services their residents receive. The distinction matters because it affects budgeting, planning, and accountability at the local level.
Go emphasized that the LGUs want to settle the matter through official financial records. They are not seeking to disrupt health services or create a standoff with PhilHealth. Rather, they want the documentation that will allow them to reconcile their own accounts with what PhilHealth reports. Once both sides have the same numbers in front of them, confusion should disappear and each government level will know exactly what it is responsible for funding and delivering.
The petition reflects a common challenge in health systems where money moves between different levels of government: without transparent tracking, local officials cannot manage their budgets effectively, and beneficiaries may not know which program is actually paying for their care. The three Pangasinan municipalities are asking PhilHealth to solve that problem by opening its books and explaining, in detail, how the YAKAP program's primary-care funds are being allocated and spent in their province.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
The clarification being sought should not be misinterpreted—the intention is only for transparency and official reconciliation of accounts.— Hue Jyro U. Go, spokesperson for the three LGUs
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei Manila Bulletin ↗