Opposition walks out of Tabung Haji RCI sitting as Speaker rejects deferment plea

If we debate without the prime minister, it is just as good as doing a press conference
Opposition chief whip Takiyuddin Hassan explaining why the sitting should be deferred until PM Anwar recovers from surgery.
Mark

Why did the opposition leave? It seems like they could have stayed and made their case.

Mimi

They felt they were being asked to perform debate theater. The prime minister wasn't there, no votes would happen, and the Speaker had already decided the sitting would go ahead. For them, that meant their voices wouldn't reach the person with actual power.

Mark

But the Deputy Prime Minister was present. Doesn't that count as government representation?

Mimi

In theory, yes. In practice, the opposition saw it as a diminishment. They wanted to confront Anwar directly about the RCI report and its handling. A deputy is not the same as the principal.

Mark

What's the real issue with the Tabung Haji report itself?

Mimi

There are two layers. One is procedural—why wasn't it debated in Parliament before being released to the public? The other is substantive—why didn't the inquiry ask the former finance minister for his side of the story, even though his tenure fell within the investigation period?

Mark

So the opposition is saying the report is incomplete?

Mimi

They're saying it's incomplete and that the process was backwards. You don't declassify a sensitive report without parliamentary scrutiny first. And you don't investigate a period without hearing from key figures.

Mark

Did the entire opposition walk out together?

Mimi

No. That's the telling part. Bersatu stayed. The coalition fractured right there in the chamber. When the opposition leader was asked if Bersatu would join, he didn't know. That suggests the walkout was a PAS and Parti Wawasan Negara decision, not a unified opposition move.

  • Opposition lawmakers walked out of special parliamentary sitting on Tabung Haji RCI report
  • Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim absent, undergoing physiotherapy post-surgery for hernia repair
  • Speaker Johari Abdul rejected opposition request to defer proceedings
  • Deputy PM Ahmad Zahid Hamidi represented government in Anwar's absence
  • Lim Guan Eng's clarifications excluded from RCI report despite his tenure as finance minister 2018-2020

Opposition chief whip argued the sitting should be postponed since PM Anwar is undergoing physiotherapy post-surgery and no voting was scheduled. Speaker Johari Abdul confirmed the sitting would proceed with Deputy PM Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and Cabinet ministers representing government in Anwar's absence.

Malaysian opposition lawmakers walked out of a special parliamentary sitting on the Tabung Haji RCI report after the Speaker rejected their request to defer proceedings until PM Anwar recovers from surgery.

The opposition benches emptied within minutes of the gavel falling on Tuesday morning's special parliamentary session. The trigger was procedural, but the grievance ran deeper: lawmakers from the Perikatan Nasional coalition had come to Parliament expecting to debate a Royal Commission of Inquiry report into Tabung Haji, the Islamic pilgrimage fund, only to find themselves locked out of meaningful participation by the absence of the prime minister and the Speaker's refusal to postpone.

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim was not in the chamber. He was at home undergoing physiotherapy following elective surgery to repair a para-umbilical hernia. In his place sat Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and other Cabinet ministers, a substitution that the opposition's chief whip, Takiyuddin Hassan of Kota Bharu, found fundamentally inadequate. "If we debate without the prime minister, it is just as good as doing a press conference," Takiyuddin told the Dewan Rakyat. He pointed out what the Speaker himself had acknowledged: this was not a full parliamentary sitting but merely a ministerial briefing, and no votes would be taken. The opposition had submitted a formal request for deferment the day before. The Speaker, Tan Sri Johari Abdul, rejected it.

What followed was a brief but heated exchange. Shahidan Kassim, the Arau MP, raised a separate complaint about the RCI report itself—specifically, that it had not sought clarifications from Lim Guan Eng, who served as finance minister from May 2018 to February 2020, even though the inquiry covered the period from 2014 to 2020. When Hulu Langat MP Mohd Sany Hamzan interjected to insist the sitting proceed as scheduled, the two men clashed. The moment crystallized the deeper fracture: the government wanted to move forward; the opposition wanted to be heard by the person in charge.

The Speaker stood firm. Standing Order 11(3) permitted the sitting to continue, she said. The government was represented. The business would proceed. Within moments, the opposition lawmakers rose and left the chamber.

Outside Parliament, the opposition's grievances multiplied. Takiyuddin questioned why the RCI report had not been tabled and debated in Parliament before being declassified for public consumption. Opposition Leader Hamzah Zainudin raised a broader question about timing: why was Anwar releasing the report now, after years of withholding it on the grounds that disclosure might damage public confidence in the Malays? The questions hung unanswered. Bersatu, another opposition party, remained in the chamber, signaling a fracture within the opposition coalition itself. By the time journalists pressed Hamzah on whether Bersatu would join the walkout, the answer was uncertain—a small but telling sign of how fragmented the opposition response had become.

The sitting is merely a ministerial briefing with no voting scheduled, making the prime minister's absence particularly problematic for meaningful debate
— Takiyuddin Hassan, Opposition chief whip
The sitting will proceed in line with Standing Order 11(3) with Cabinet ministers representing the government
— Tan Sri Johari Abdul, Dewan Rakyat Speaker
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Malay Mail ↗
Contáctanos FAQ