In the run-up to New South Wales' March 2027 election, a One Nation upper house candidate has pressed a claim of 'demographic replacement' at a Sydney rally, and the party has so far kept him on its ticket. The episode sits within a long Australian argument about immigration, national identity and who gets to define the country's future. Politicians across the spectrum are now weighing condemnation against electoral arithmetic that favours the party's rise. What remains unsettled is whether the rhetoric will cost One Nation its footing with moderate voters, or whether it will prove a durable d
One Nation keeps NSW candidate Stuart Bonds despite backlash over 'demographically replaced' remarks
One Nation dropped one candidate over a Hitler post, but kept Bonds
Why does this one matter more than a single candidate's speech?
Because Bonds isn't a long shot. With One Nation polling in the high 20s and low 30s and a 4.5% quota, he's all but certain to win an upper house seat.
And the party kept him while dropping someone else?
Yes. Victoria's branch disendorsed a lower-house candidate over an old post calling Hitler the "GOAT". Bonds said his words on stage and again on a podcast, and he's still lead candidate.
Worth being careful there. The article reports the contrast, but nobody from One Nation explains the difference in treatment.
What about his statistics on overseas-born Australians?
The figures of 10% in 1945 and 32% in 2025 are ABS data. But the share was 32.4% in 1891, which he didn't mention.
Right, so the numbers are real but the framing leaves something out. The birthrate point, below 2.1, is his claim and the piece doesn't test it.
How is the Coalition handling it?
Sloane called the language divisive but wouldn't rule out working with One Nation in a minority government. She says no formal coalition.
And the claim that many of her MPs privately expect a coalition is the Financial Review's reporting, attributed and unconfirmed here.
So what's still unknown?
Whether preferences flow, whether the Coalition shifts, and whether Bonds is reined in. Newman didn't answer that directly.
Der Puls
- A One Nation candidate's rally remarks about 'demographic replacement' have ignited a sharp rebuke from NSW Labor, which has moved to censure him.
- The party disendorsed a Victorian candidate over a Hitler post yet has kept Stuart Bonds, creating visible inconsistency in its standards.
- Bonds has doubled down in a podcast and radio interview, citing selective statistics and refusing to soften his claims.
- The Coalition's delayed response and open door to a post-election arrangement with One Nation leave the opposition's position uncertain.
- With the quota at 4.5% and One Nation polling in the high 20s, the party looks set to win several upper house seats and target Labor's regional strongholds.
In the run-up to New South Wales' March 2027 election, a One Nation upper house candidate has pressed a claim of 'demographic replacement' at a Sydney rally, and the party has so far kept him on its ticket. The episode sits within a long Australian argument about immigration, national identity and who gets to define the country's future. Politicians across the spectrum are now weighing condemnation against electoral arithmetic that favours the party's rise. What remains unsettled is whether the rhetoric will cost One Nation its footing with moderate voters, or whether it will prove a durable draw in regional seats.
At a Sydney anti-immigration rally held on a Sunday, Stuart Bonds, One Nation's lead upper house candidate, told the crowd that Australians were being demographically replaced inside their own nation. He framed migration as a socialist plan that would leave the country paying to raise other cultures' children. The language echoed the far-right great replacement theory, and it drew fast and wide criticism.
One Nation has not removed him. The same week, the party dropped a Victorian candidate over an old post calling Hitler the GOAT, which made its decision to keep Bonds harder to explain. Bonds then appeared to double down on a podcast and on ABC radio, citing migration statistics while leaving out that the overseas-born share was higher in 1891.
NSW Labor moved quickly. Premier Chris Minns called the remarks racist, and both houses passed censure motions. Deputy Premier Prue Car and Treasurer Daniel Mookhey, whose families came from India, spoke about what the words meant for people like them. The Coalition, by contrast, took four days to respond, and its leader Kellie Sloane called the language divisive while leaving room for a post-election working arrangement with One Nation.
The stakes are concrete. With the upper house quota at 4.5% and One Nation polling strongly, Bonds is almost certain to win a seat, and analysts expect the party to target multi-ethnic Sydney seats and Labor's Hunter heartland. Whether Sloane's position shifts before March may decide how far the controversy reaches.
In a Facebook video from a Sydney anti-immigration rally held on a Sunday, a man dressed as a medieval knight stands in the background while Stuart Bonds, One Nation's lead upper house candidate in New South Wales, speaks against "mass" migration. "Make no mistake, we are being demographically replaced inside our own nation," he says. He goes on to argue that if Australians do not back Australian mothers having Australian children, the country will end up paying to raise other cultures' children, and he calls it a socialist plan to tear down the fabric of civilisation.
The language echoes the "great replacement theory", the far-right conspiracy theory that white westerners are being deliberately replaced by minority ethnic immigrants. The remarks drew wide criticism, but One Nation has shown no sign of removing Bonds from the ticket for the state election in March 2027. The party did drop a candidate this week: its Victorian branch disendorsed a lower-house candidate over an old social media post calling Hitler the "GOAT", shorthand for greatest of all time.
The rally was not a one-off. On a podcast released Monday with the rally's organiser, the Australian Lobby Group, Bonds appeared to double down. He did not challenge host Scott Challen's claim that Labor governments were building "ethnic voting blocks" of Middle Eastern and subcontinent people to entrench their power. Instead he replied that this was why One Nation would get rid of all multicultural grants. On Wednesday, he told ABC Upper Hunter that Australian Bureau of Statistics data shows the share of Australians born overseas rising from 10% in 1945 to 32% in 2025. He did not mention that the share was higher still, at 32.4%, in 1891, the first year of data. With the birthrate below the 2.1 needed to replace the population, he said, he would like to know what people think is going to happen, and where the people will come from.
NSW Labor responded immediately. Premier Chris Minns called the comments "frankly outrageous and racist", and the government passed motions in both houses censuring Bonds, who is not yet a member of parliament. Deputy premier Prue Car, who has Indian heritage and holds the seat of Londonderry, told question time on Tuesday that Bonds was talking about families like hers and those she represents. Treasurer Daniel Mookhey, whose parents emigrated from India in the 1970s, said Bonds appeared to be alleging a deliberate conspiracy to use migrants to replace native-born Australians for political reasons, and that it was not grounded in reality.
The Coalition took four days to follow. On Wednesday afternoon, opposition leader Kellie Sloane called Bonds' language "clearly divisive". But she did not rule out a confidence and supply arrangement with One Nation after the election, saying the Coalition would not form a coalition with the party but would work with anyone if in minority government. The Australian Financial Review has reported that many of her MPs privately expect a Coalition with One Nation, and the Coalition has been polling consistently behind One Nation.
One Nation's state leader, Mike Newman, did not directly say whether he agreed with Bonds or would rein him in. He called Bonds a patriotic Aussie and coalminer with very strong views, and said the aim was to protect Australian values and promote assimilation. In September Newman said he "made a mistake" when he told a Sydney rally he wanted to stop abortions.
The electoral stakes are concrete. The quota for the upper house is 4.5%, and One Nation has been polling in the high 20s and low 30s in recent months, making Bonds all but certain of a seat. Antony Green, the ABC's former election analyst, expects the party to win four or five seats; it has so far named three candidates, Newman, Bonds and Jeff Bacon, a firearms manufacturer who is second on the ticket. Green said Labor would use the remarks in multi-ethnic Sydney seats, including those on the city's rural fringe that One Nation plans to target. Kos Samaras, a former Labor strategist now at Redbridge, said the comments could alienate moderate Liberal voters in Sydney but that "you might be able to get away with it" in parts of NSW. Bonds' base is the Hunter, and Samaras said One Nation could "clean the deck" in regional seats, including Labor-held ones there.
Unlike Victoria, NSW has optional preferential voting, so lower-house preference flows are not guaranteed. Asked whether he had jeopardised a preference deal with the Coalition, Bonds said that if the Coalition had a problem with facts, perhaps, but that he was not there to impress them. What to watch before March is whether Sloane's position on working with One Nation shifts.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
Make no mistake, we are being demographically replaced inside our own nation.— Stuart Bonds, One Nation candidate, at a Sydney rally
The remarks were frankly outrageous and racist.— Chris Minns, NSW premier