Oman's Foreign Minister Says US Insistence on Iran as Threat Is Blocking Middle East Peace

Not just excluded. Worse. Positioned as the threat.
Albusaidi described how outside powers cast Iran in Gulf security planning.
Mark

Why does this speech matter more than the usual diplomatic proposals?

Mimi

Because of who is saying it. Albusaidi is the first Gulf leader to openly call for the Sunni Gulf states to ally with Iran, something Tehran has wanted for a long time.

Mark

And he's blaming the US directly.

Mimi

He says fifty years of insisting Iran is the threat held the region back, and that Iran was excluded from security arrangements the whole time.

Luke

That's his account, though. It's an argument, not an established finding. Nothing here shows other Gulf states agree.

Mark

What about the Tehran meeting the same day?

Mimi

Turkish, Pakistani and Saudi officials went to try to prevent renewed US-Iran fighting. Tehran said they also discussed future security arrangements. The Saudi defence minister was there weeks after Iran struck Saudi infrastructure.

Luke

Worth noting that Tehran's description of the agenda is what we have. We don't know what was actually agreed.

Mark

Does Oman's position affect Hormuz?

Mimi

Oman and Iran have a temporary shipping arrangement, but it waits on both the US and Iran lifting their blockades.

Luke

And the article says a pact could take many months, so it doesn't obviously solve the US demand to reopen the strait before sanctions relief. Claims about Netanyahu pushing for war come from Israeli media reports, not confirmed.

  • Oman's foreign minister has publicly accused Washington of blocking regional peace for 50 years by casting Iran as the threat.
  • A proposed non-aggression pact spanning all six Gulf states, Iran and Iraq would sideline the US as the primary security provider.
  • Turkish, Pakistani and Saudi officials rushed to Tehran the same day to head off renewed fighting between the US and Iran.
  • The Strait of Hormuz remains stalled, with a temporary shipping deal frozen until both US and Iranian blockades are lifted.
  • The pact faces months of negotiation, deep regional resistance, and a US demand to reopen the strait before any sanctions relief.

On a Monday at Girton College in Cambridge, Oman's foreign minister Badr Albusaidi offered a reframing of a conflict that has shaped the Gulf for half a century: that the region's failure to govern itself has been less a matter of rival peoples than of outside powers insisting that Iran be cast as the enemy. In calling for a non-aggression pact binding the six Gulf states with Iran and Iraq, and loosening the American role as the region's primary guarantor, he asked the Gulf to imagine a security built from within rather than imposed from afar. The proposal arrives in a moment of open hostility and diplomatic scrambling, when the most basic questions of who may pass through the Strait of Hormuz remain unsettled.

On Monday at Girton College in Cambridge, Oman's foreign minister Badr Albusaidi made a case that the Middle East has been stuck because, for fifty years, the United States has insisted the Gulf treat Iran as its central security threat. He argued that regional powers have never been allowed to take collective responsibility for their own affairs, and that Iran has been excluded from any meaningful role, to the lasting harm of everyone.

His answer is a non-aggression pact joining all six Gulf states with Iran and Iraq, in which America would no longer be the main guarantor of security. He admitted the idea sounds counterintuitive and the talks will be hard. Yet he also pointed out that the Hormuz question, which sits between Oman on one shore and Iran on the other, cannot be solved while outside powers keep setting the terms.

The speech landed on a tense day. Officials from Turkey, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia travelled to Tehran to prevent a fresh outbreak of fighting between Washington and Tehran, and the presence of Saudi defence minister Khalid bin Salman was striking given recent Iranian strikes on Saudi infrastructure. Albusaidi also pushed back on the case for another strike, insisting that the February talks Oman mediated were close to an agreement. "We still stand by that judgment today," he said.

The road ahead is long. The pact would take many months to negotiate, faces strong resistance across the region, and may not satisfy Washington's demand that Iran reopen the strait before sanctions are lifted.

On Monday, at Girton College in Cambridge, Oman's foreign minister Badr Albusaidi stood up and argued that the Middle East has been unable to solve its own problems largely because, for 50 years, the United States has insisted that the Gulf states treat Iran as a security threat. The speech was billed as a significant attempt to break the deadlock over the region's future.

Albusaidi called for a non-aggression security pact that would bring in all six Gulf states, along with Iran and Iraq. Under such an arrangement, he said, the US would no longer be the primary provider of security. He acknowledged that the talks might be difficult and that the idea might look counterintuitive. But he argued that issues such as the strait of Hormuz have become impossible to resolve because outside powers keep defining the terms of engagement, while regional powers cannot take collective responsibility or reach a consensus among themselves.

He went further. Regional security arrangements, he said, are underdeveloped because they have relied for too long on external powers. Iran, in his account, was systematically excluded from any meaningful role for half a century, with negative consequences for the whole region. Among the priorities imposed from outside, he named the false perception of a fundamental antagonism between Iran and the Arab states of the Gulf. The most damaging, he said, was the requirement that Iran be not merely excluded but positioned as the threat around which regional security had to be organised.

The timing mattered. On the same day, senior defence and intelligence officials from Turkey, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia travelled to Tehran to try to head off a renewed outbreak of fighting between the US and Iran. Tehran said the meeting also explored future security arrangements. The presence of Saudi defence minister Khalid bin Salman in the Iranian capital was striking: Iran had struck Saudi infrastructure only weeks earlier, and Iran-backed Houthis are still firing missiles toward Riyadh.

Albusaidi is the first Gulf leader to break ranks this explicitly, calling for the mainly Sunni Gulf states to form a security alliance with Iran, a long-held Tehran aspiration. Iran's foreign ministry has often proposed a regional pact in which Iran, rather than the US, has a role. The conflict may also have reopened a debate among Gulf states over whether the heavy US base presence on their soil brings reassurance or insecurity. Oman has already explored a regional pact that includes Iran. No Gulf state openly backed the US-Israeli attacks on Iran last year or this February, though some have covertly cooperated. Iran has responded by hitting US bases and energy infrastructure in the Gulf.

Oman sits on the southern side of the strait of Hormuz, with Iran on the northern shore. The two have reached a temporary agreement on managing shipping traffic, but it is on hold until the US and Iran each lift their blockades. Albusaidi also indirectly challenged Donald Trump's case for another strike, saying that the February US-Iran talks, which Oman mediated, were making significant progress and that an agreement was within reach. "We still stand by that judgment today," he said.

The backdrop is tense. The Pentagon continues to brief on a major military buildup for a possible assault after the midterm elections. Qatari mediators spent much of Sunday in Tehran seeking terms for reopening the strait. Israeli media have reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been pressing the military to provoke a war with Iran before Israel's election on Tuesday, and Trump's repeated calls for Netanyahu's re-election feed a regional sense that the US and Israel could be a long-term source of insecurity.

The proposal will meet resistance across much of the region, given the economic damage Tehran has been willing to inflict directly or through proxies like the Houthis. Iranian hardliners increasingly argue that Iran's security lies in trying to build a nuclear bomb. And a pact likely to take many months to negotiate may not answer Washington's demand that Iran reopen the strait before sanctions are lifted.

The talks in February that Oman mediated were making significant progress, and an agreement was within reach. We still stand by that judgment today.
— Badr Albusaidi, Oman's foreign minister
Contattaci Domande frequenti