In the narrow waters of the Strait of Hormuz, where a third of the world's seaborne oil has long passed in uneasy transit, a projectile struck the tanker On Peace on Tuesday morning, wounding twelve of its nineteen crew — seventeen of them Indian nationals whose labor quietly sustains global shipping. Oman's air force evacuated the injured to hospital, but the incident was not an aberration; it was the latest in at least seven tanker attacks within a single week, part of a deliberate Iranian campaign to impose order — and fees — on one of civilization's most consequential chokepoints. The conf
Oman evacuates 10 injured crew after tanker attack in Strait of Hormuz
At least 12 crew members injured in the attack; 17 of 19 crew were Indian nationals, with 11 of the injured being Indian sailors.
A tax on every barrel that flows through contested waters
Mark
Why does it matter that most of the injured crew were Indian nationals?
Mimi
India supplies a huge share of the world's merchant sailors. When attacks happen in the Strait of Hormuz, Indian workers are statistically more likely to be on those ships. The Indian government has already documented at least 10 Indian seafarers killed since February.
Luke
That's important context, but let's be precise: the source says 10 killed since the war began, plus one more in September. So 11 total that India has publicly acknowledged. We don't know if that's a complete count across all nationalities.
Mark
Is anyone actually stopping ships from passing through?
Mimi
No. That's the surprising part. Despite all these attacks—seven incidents in one week alone—Middle Eastern oil exports have bounced back to pre-war levels. Tankers are still moving.
Luke
They're moving, but at a cost. Brent crude is at $101 a barrel, up from $72 before the war. That's a 40 percent premium. So the attacks aren't blocking traffic; they're making it more expensive.
Mark
Who's actually doing the attacking?
Mimi
No one has claimed responsibility for Tuesday's attack on the On Peace. But the pattern is clear—Iran has been targeting ships that don't use its designated route through the strait.
Luke
Right, but we should say: the source attributes this to Iran based on the pattern and Iran's stated intentions. No group claimed this specific attack. That's an important distinction.
Mark
What happens next?
Mimi
India is calling for the attacks to stop. But as long as the war continues, the Strait of Hormuz will remain contested and dangerous.
Luke
The real question is whether this becomes unsustainable. Right now, higher prices are absorbing the risk. But if attacks intensify or insurance costs spike further, that calculus could shift.
The Pulse
- A projectile tore into the Panamanian-flagged tanker On Peace just 17 kilometers off Oman's coast, igniting fire aboard and injuring at least 12 of 19 crew members in a matter of moments.
- Eleven of the wounded were Indian sailors — part of a grim pattern in which at least 10 Indian seafarers have been killed since the US-Israel war against Iran began in late February, exposing the human cost borne by a nation that supplies much of the world's maritime labor.
- Iran has been systematically targeting vessels that do not follow its designated shipping corridor through the strait, with at least seven tanker incidents reported in the past week alone, signaling a calculated campaign rather than random violence.
- Oman's air force evacuated 10 of the injured crew to Khasab hospital, and India's Ministry of External Affairs issued an urgent call for the attacks to stop — but no group has claimed responsibility and no resolution is in sight.
- Despite the violence, Middle East crude exports have rebounded to pre-war levels of roughly 18.3 million barrels per day — yet Brent crude sits at $101.51 a barrel, a 40 percent premium over pre-war prices that reflects the invisible tax of sustained maritime risk.
In the narrow waters of the Strait of Hormuz, where a third of the world's seaborne oil has long passed in uneasy transit, a projectile struck the tanker On Peace on Tuesday morning, wounding twelve of its nineteen crew — seventeen of them Indian nationals whose labor quietly sustains global shipping. Oman's air force evacuated the injured to hospital, but the incident was not an aberration; it was the latest in at least seven tanker attacks within a single week, part of a deliberate Iranian campaign to impose order — and fees — on one of civilization's most consequential chokepoints. The conflict between great powers is being paid for, in blood and risk, by the sailors of smaller nations who sail where the world's commerce demands they go.
On Tuesday morning, a projectile struck the On Peace, a Panamanian-flagged oil tanker navigating the Strait of Hormuz near Oman's Limah coast. The impact started a fire and injured at least 12 of the 19 crew aboard. Oman's air force evacuated 10 of the wounded to Khasab hospital in the Musandam governorate.
The human geography of the crew tells a larger story. Seventeen of the nineteen sailors were Indian nationals, and eleven of the injured were Indian seafarers. India's Ministry of External Affairs confirmed the figures and noted a devastating trend: at least 10 Indian sailors have been killed since the US-Israel war against Iran began in late February. India provides a disproportionate share of the world's merchant marine workforce, and its sailors are paying a disproportionate price.
No group claimed responsibility, but the pattern is legible. Since late February, Iran has been targeting commercial vessels that do not follow its designated shipping corridor through the strait, and has signaled its intent to charge fees for safe passage. Shipping intelligence firm Marisks recorded at least seven tanker incidents in the past week alone — a frequency that points to deliberate strategy rather than isolated violence.
And yet the strait has not closed. Middle Eastern crude exports have recovered to roughly 18.3 million barrels per day, near pre-war averages. Commerce continues, routes are adjusted, insurance is paid. What has changed is the price: Brent crude closed at $101.51 per barrel on Tuesday, up from $72.48 the day before the conflict escalated — a 40 percent premium that functions as a hidden surcharge on every barrel moving through contested water. India's call for an immediate halt to the attacks carried the weight of a nation whose workers are absorbing the human cost of a war they did not choose, in a waterway the world cannot afford to lose.
A projectile struck the On Peace, a Panamanian-flagged oil tanker, on Tuesday morning as it moved through the Strait of Hormuz roughly 17 kilometers off the Omani coast near Limah. The impact ignited a fire aboard the vessel and left at least 12 of the ship's 19 crew members injured. Oman's air force responded by evacuating 10 of those injured crew members, transporting them to Khasab hospital in the Musandam governorate for medical care, according to a statement from the Omani Ministry of Defence.
The crew composition underscores how deeply this regional conflict reaches into global maritime labor. Of the 19 people aboard, 17 were Indian nationals—and 11 of those injured were Indian sailors. India's Ministry of External Affairs confirmed these figures and expressed alarm at the pattern. The Indian government has been tracking a grim toll: at least 10 Indian seafarers killed since the US-Israel war against Iran began in late February, with another Indian sailor dying in a separate Strait of Hormuz attack in September. India supplies a substantial portion of the world's merchant marine workforce, making its sailors disproportionately exposed to the hazards unfolding in this chokepoint.
No group has claimed responsibility for Tuesday's attack, but the context is unmistakable. Since late February, Iran has effectively restricted passage through the Strait of Hormuz, targeting commercial vessels that do not follow its designated shipping corridor and signaling its intention to charge fees for safe passage. The On Peace incident is one of at least seven tanker-related incidents reported in just the past week, according to Marisks, a shipping intelligence service. The frequency and pattern suggest a deliberate campaign rather than isolated incidents.
Yet the attacks have not achieved the disruption one might expect. Middle Eastern crude exports have climbed back to pre-war levels in recent weeks. According to provisional data from Kpler, a shipping analytics firm, the seven-day moving average of crude exports from the region reached 18.3 million barrels per day on September 30—roughly equivalent to the 18 million barrels per day average in the year before the war began. Tankers are moving through, insurance is being paid, routes are being adjusted, and commerce persists.
What has not normalized is the price. Brent crude futures closed at $101.51 per barrel on Tuesday, a sharp jump from $72.48 on February 27, the day before the conflict escalated. That 40 percent premium reflects the risk premium buyers now attach to Middle Eastern oil—a tax on every barrel that flows through contested waters. India's Ministry of External Affairs called for an immediate halt to the attacks, framing them as threats to regional peace and stability. The statement carried the weight of a nation whose workers are bearing the human cost of a conflict they did not create, in a waterway through which roughly one-third of the world's seaborne oil passes.
Notable Quotes
The continuing incidents of attacks on shipping in the region remain a cause of deep concern for India. We reiterate our call for an immediate cessation of such attacks in the interests of peace and stability in the region.— India's Ministry of External Affairs
Want the full story?
Read the original at Al Jazeera ↗