Oil Trail, Truck Data Lead to Murder Conviction in South Carolina Hit-and-Run

Davis McClendon, 46, was killed when struck by a pickup truck driven by his girlfriend's estranged husband in a jealousy-motivated attack; the victim's girlfriend and three children were left to rebuild their lives.
The truck's brain showed malice and intent
A prosecutor held up Ackerman's pickup's infotainment system as evidence of premeditation and jealous rage.
Mark

Why does the oil matter so much? It's just a leak.

Mimi

Because it's a map. It shows where the truck went after the collision—from the crash site all the way to Ackerman's parents' house. Without that trail, investigators might have had suspicions but no proof of where to look.

Mark

The truck's computer recorded three thousand events in one day. That seems like a lot of noise to find a signal in.

Mimi

It is, but that's the point. The data is so granular, so precise, that it becomes almost like a witness. It shows not just that Ackerman was there, but when, how fast he was going, even the exact moment his foot hit the brake.

Mark

Ackerman says he was trying to avoid McClendon, that he swerved left to miss him. How do you prove intent from a swerve?

Mimi

You don't, not directly. But you prove it from everything before—the hours of searching, the calls, the tracking, the anger. The swerve alone might be ambiguous. The swerve plus all of that becomes a pattern.

Mark

Meredith Haynie says McClendon saved her life. Do you believe that?

Mimi

I think she believes it. She lived with Ackerman's paranoia, his hidden cameras, his control. She saw what he was capable of when he felt betrayed. Whether he intended to hit her or Davis first—that's unknowable. But her fear feels real.

Mark

Why didn't anyone call 911? That's the thing that haunts people.

Mimi

Panic, maybe. Denial. Ackerman went home and told his parents what happened, but they didn't call either. It's the one thing that makes you wonder if they understood what had actually occurred, or if they were protecting him.

Mark

The jury took less than thirty minutes. Does that bother you?

Mimi

It bothers Ackerman's attorney. But sometimes the evidence is just that clear. The jury had the video, the data, the timeline, the testimony. They didn't need to stew over it.

  • Davis McClendon, 46, struck and killed by pickup truck on May 7, 2023, in Greenwood, South Carolina
  • Bud Ackerman convicted of murder after oil trail and truck data led investigators to his parents' house
  • Ackerman's Ford F-250 infotainment system recorded 3,000+ events, pinpointing collision at 1:11:31 a.m.
  • Jury deliberated less than 30 minutes; Ackerman sentenced to 45 years with no parole eligibility

Bud Ackerman was found guilty of murdering Davis McClendon after an oil leak from his truck created a forensic trail leading investigators directly to his parents' house. Digital data from Ackerman's Ford F-250 infotainment system recorded over 3,000 events that night, pinpointing the exact moment of collision and proving he'd been tracking his estranged wife's movements.

A jealous estranged husband was convicted of intentionally hitting his wife's new boyfriend with his pickup truck, with digital evidence from the vehicle's onboard computer and an oil trail proving his guilt.

On a dark road in Greenwood, South Carolina, just after one in the morning on May 7, 2023, Davis McClendon stood outside his BMW sedan and never came home. Investigators found his body fifty feet from the car, a shirt and shoe scattered on the pavement, the vehicle's fender torn back like a tuna can. What they didn't find at first was the other vehicle—the one that had hit him. But there was something else: a slick of oil on the road, tire marks, and a trail of evidence that would lead them straight to a man consumed by jealousy.

McClendon, forty-six, was everyone's best friend. His coworkers at a retirement home knew him as the most empathetic person they'd ever met. His friends described him as someone who loved big, who had time for everyone, who seemed incapable of making an enemy. He had recently divorced, but that hadn't dimmed his devotion to his children or his friends. Then, on Christmas Eve 2022, he met Meredith Haynie at a bar. She was celebrating her thirty-ninth birthday in a ugly Christmas sweater. He sat down and started talking to her. They kept talking. Within months, they were planning a future together—rocking chairs on a porch at eighty, she would later say. They had less than six months.

Haynie had left her husband of ten years, Bud Ackerman, an auto body shop owner from a prominent local family, about six months before meeting McClendon. She described a marriage that had deteriorated into something frightening: Ackerman's drinking and unpredictability, his screaming and degradation, his paranoia. She found hidden cameras—one cut into a pillow in their closet, another in their dresser facing the bed, others in the children's rooms and buried in the front yard. When she separated from him in spring 2022, she felt like she could breathe again. But when Ackerman discovered she was dating McClendon in early May 2023, something shifted. He texted her: "How could you." He called McClendon and asked him to back off until the divorce was final. McClendon and Haynie talked about it and decided that was just another way Ackerman was trying to control her.

On the night McClendon died, Ackerman spent hours hunting for them. Phone records and security video told the story: at 8:54 p.m., he texted Haynie asking why she hated him. She was at dinner with McClendon at Break on the Lake. Ackerman called her on FaceTime—"Where are you? Who are you with? Why are you doing this to me?"—and eventually she told him or he figured it out from what he could see around her. By 10:40 p.m., security cameras caught him at a club called Key West, drinking, talking to people, his agitation visible. He called Haynie again. She said he sounded intoxicated and vulgar. After midnight, his truck circled the parking lot at Break on the Lake, searching. But McClendon and Haynie had moved back to Key West. At 12:51 a.m., McClendon stepped outside to call Ackerman. "He wanted to talk to him," Haynie said later. "He thought he could bring the temperature down." McClendon told Haynie he was going to meet Ackerman. She went to check on him and he was gone.

The oil trail led investigators from the crash site directly to Ackerman's parents' house, where he'd been living since the separation. When deputies arrived, they found his white Ford F-250 pickup leaking from the undercarriage, a crack in the grille, damage consistent with hitting a person. Ackerman was arrested at 6:30 a.m. But the real evidence came from the truck itself. Modern pickup trucks store thousands of data points—speed, acceleration, brake pressure, even which Wi-Fi networks they pass. Investigators extracted over three thousand events from a single twenty-four-hour period. The data showed Ackerman had driven past Haynie's house that night, onto McClendon's street, circling, searching. At 1:11 a.m. and thirty-one seconds on May 7th, the truck's computer recorded a hard brake. Seconds later, the door opened before the truck shifted to park. Ackerman got out, then got back in, shifted to drive, and turned around near a streetlight—the same streetlight where oil spatters were found a foot up the post. Then he drove home, leaving an oil trail all the way to his parents' driveway, where his phone disconnected from the infotainment system. He was home.

Ackerman's attorney argued it was an accident. He said his client had no intention of hurting McClendon, that he simply wanted to talk to him, that McClendon was standing in the middle of a dark road and Ackerman didn't see him until it was too late. He said Ackerman swerved left to avoid him, not to hit him. He called an expert who testified that in the dark, on a slope, with the BMW's headlights in his eyes, Ackerman would have had at most two and a half seconds to react—not enough time. But prosecutors painted a different picture. They showed doorbell camera video from neighbors capturing the moment of impact, the truck passing through the frame, then a sound like a crash, then muffled sounds that prosecutors said was Ackerman yelling at McClendon. They presented Meredith Haynie, who testified about the obsessive calls, the tracking, her fear. They presented the digital evidence: the truck's brain, as one prosecutor called it, showing Ackerman was going twenty-five miles per hour, that he was on the wrong side of the road when he hit the BMW, that he was in exactly the right place at exactly the right time. The jury deliberated for less than thirty minutes. They found Ackerman guilty of murder. The judge sentenced him to forty-five years with no possibility of parole.

Haynie believes McClendon saved her life that night—that Ackerman had meant to target her, and that she's only alive because he found Davis first. She's rebuilding with her three children, determined to give them a life beyond that dark intersection. McClendon's friends still struggle with the fact that no one in the Ackerman family called 911. Ackerman is appealing his conviction. He will not be eligible for release until 2068.

Davis saved my life.
— Meredith Haynie, McClendon's girlfriend, on why she believes Ackerman intended to target her
This might as well be a drive-by shooting with a gun.
— Prosecutor John Meadors, comparing the truck to a weapon
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei CBS News ↗
Kontakt FAQ