WTI crude rose to $90.51 and Brent to $96.34 following U.S. strikes on Iranian military targets and interception of four attack drones in southern Iran. Trump's comments rejecting rushed agreements and refusing sanctions relief or asset releases undermine Iranian signals that a ceasefire extension was nearing completion.
Oil Surges on U.S.-Iran Military Escalation as Peace Talks Teeter
If it's not a great deal, we're not making it.
So the strikes happened, prices went up—that's straightforward. But what was the market actually pricing in before this?
For most of the week, traders believed a deal was real. Iranian media was saying a ceasefire extension was nearly done, with sanctions relief attached. That's huge—it means the Strait stays open, supply flows normally, the risk premium disappears. Prices fell 7% on that hope.
But how solid was that signal? Was it official Iranian government statements, or just media reporting? There's a difference.
Fair point—it was media reporting, not a formal announcement. So it was always fragile.
And Trump's comments—he basically said no deal unless it's perfect. How much weight does that carry?
Enormous. He controls the sanctions lever. If he won't lift them, Iran has no incentive to negotiate. And he said it publicly, so he can't easily walk it back.
But we should note: we don't know what "great deal" means to him. That's his subjective standard. We're reading tea leaves.
What about the hardliners in Tehran attacking the negotiators?
That's the real problem. Even if Trump wanted a deal, the Iranian hardliners are saying no—full control of the Strait, no uranium concessions. Those are non-starters for the U.S.
Again, we're seeing this through reporting by the Financial Times. It's accurate reporting, but it's one source's window into internal Iranian politics. We don't have direct quotes from the hardliners themselves.
So we're stuck. Neither side can move without losing face at home.
Exactly. And every day that passes without a deal, the military risk stays elevated. The strikes Thursday proved that.
One more thing: the inventory data. Six weeks of declining stockpiles. Is that because of the geopolitical risk, or normal seasonal patterns?
The article doesn't specify. It's presented as bullish for prices, but we'd need more context to know if it's unusual.
El Pulso
- WTI crude rose 2.06% to $90.51; Brent climbed 2.17% to $96.34
- U.S. strikes hit Iranian ground control station and shot down four attack drones in southern Iran
- Oil prices had fallen more than 7% earlier in the week on ceasefire optimism
- U.S. crude inventories fell 2.8 million barrels for the sixth consecutive week
- Iranian hardliners publicly opposing negotiators' compromises on Strait of Hormuz control and uranium enrichment
WTI crude rose to $90.51 and Brent to $96.34 following U.S. strikes on Iranian military targets and interception of four attack drones in southern Iran. Trump's comments rejecting rushed agreements and refusing sanctions relief or asset releases undermine Iranian signals that a ceasefire extension was nearing completion.
Oil prices jumped 2% after U.S. military strikes on Iranian targets and drone interceptions renewed concerns that fragile ceasefire negotiations could collapse, disrupting Strait of Hormuz traffic.
Oil markets jolted higher in early Asian trading Thursday after word spread of fresh American military strikes on Iranian targets, erasing a week of optimism that had briefly pushed prices lower. West Texas Intermediate crude jumped 2.06% to $90.51 a barrel, while Brent climbed 2.17% to $96.34. The moves reversed a sharp downward trend—both benchmarks had fallen more than 7% earlier in the week as traders grew convinced that peace talks might actually succeed, that the Strait of Hormuz might reopen to normal traffic, that the risk premium baked into every barrel could finally ease.
The strikes themselves were described by U.S. Central Command as defensive in nature. American forces hit a ground control station in southern Iran and shot down four Iranian attack drones, with officials claiming the station was preparing to launch a fifth. The action came hours after President Trump held a press conference in which he signaled no urgency to reach an agreement. "If it's not a great deal, we're not making it," he said, adding that the United States would not discuss easing sanctions or returning frozen Iranian assets. He also issued a familiar threat: if Iran did not meet his terms, the U.S. would "finish them off."
Those comments landed like a bucket of cold water on the market's fragile confidence. Just days earlier, Iranian media outlets had been signaling that a ceasefire extension was close, potentially including sanctions relief and the unfreezing of Iranian assets held abroad. Traders had priced in that possibility. Trump's words, combined with the military action, suggested the diplomatic window was narrowing fast. Equally troubling were reports from Tehran itself: ultra-hardline factions were openly attacking the government's negotiators, accusing them of capitulating to Washington. These hardliners were demanding that Iran maintain complete control over the Strait of Hormuz and refuse any concessions on uranium enrichment—positions that would make compromise nearly impossible.
The price movement also reflected tightening supply. The American Petroleum Institute reported Wednesday that U.S. crude inventories had fallen by 2.8 million barrels the previous week, marking the sixth consecutive weekly decline. That data point, combined with the geopolitical risk, created a pincer movement pushing prices upward. Official inventory figures from the Energy Information Administration were due later Thursday, delayed a day because of the Memorial Day holiday.
For now, the ceasefire technically held and negotiations continued. But the margin for error had shrunk dramatically. A durable peace agreement and a long-term mechanism to guarantee traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remained unsigned and uncertain. Until those pieces fell into place, oil traders would remain braced for the next shock—the next strike, the next inflammatory statement, the next sign that the two sides were drifting back toward confrontation.
Citas Notables
If it's not a great deal, we're not making it.— President Trump, Wednesday press conference
The U.S. was not talking about any easing of sanctions or giving money.— President Trump, Wednesday press conference