Oil surges as Hormuz tensions flare amid Trump threats and stalled Iran talks

Israeli strikes in Lebanon killed at least 20 people on Saturday, one day after a ceasefire with Hezbollah took effect.
Iran is likely to continue to find pretexts to stymie flows
An energy analyst explains why the Strait's closure may not be temporary, despite hopes for a lasting peace deal.
Mark

So Iran closed the Strait again. How much of that is real leverage and how much is theater?

Mimi

It's both. The Strait handles roughly a third of global seaborne oil trade. When Iran closes it, even for a day, markets move. But Iran knows that too—they're using it as their main bargaining chip while these talks are happening.

Luke

Right, but we should be clear: did Iran actually close it, or did shipping just slow down? The reporting says shipping "slowed" and Iran "announced" a closure. Those aren't quite the same thing.

Mimi

Fair point. The announcement itself was enough to spook traders. Whether every ship actually turned around or just delayed doesn't matter as much as the signal it sent.

Mark

And Trump's threatening attacks while Vance is negotiating. That seems designed to fail.

Mimi

It does look contradictory. But Trump has always negotiated this way—maximum pressure while talking. Whether it's strategy or chaos is still an open question.

Luke

The Lebanon piece is crucial though. Twenty people killed one day after a ceasefire. That's not a minor violation—that's the ceasefire already broken. If you're Iran, you have a legitimate complaint.

Mark

So the deal was never really stable to begin with.

Mimi

It looks that way. It was always going to be tested the moment either side had an incentive to push back. Lebanon gave them that incentive.

Luke

One thing I'd want to know: how much of this oil price movement is about actual supply disruption versus fear? Because if ships are still moving through, even slowly, the real impact might be smaller than the market reaction.

Mark

And that matters for how long this holds.

Mimi

Exactly. If the Strait stays closed for weeks, that's a different story than if it reopens in days. Right now we're in the fog.

  • Iran shut the Strait of Hormuz hours after U.S.-Iran peace talks began, citing Israeli strikes in Lebanon that killed at least 20 people the day a ceasefire was supposed to hold.
  • Oil prices whipsawed violently — down more than 8 percent last week on hopes of a thaw, then surging Monday as the closure erased that optimism in a matter of hours.
  • President Trump posted threats of renewed military strikes against Iran on social media at the very moment Vice President Vance was sitting across the table from Iranian officials, fracturing the diplomatic signal before it could land.
  • Analysts warn Iran has little incentive to relinquish control of the Strait, calling it the country's sole remaining point of leverage as negotiations grind toward uncertain midterm deadlines.
  • Regional producers — Iraq, the UAE, Kuwait — had already signaled expanded output to fill anticipated Iranian supply, but those plans now hang suspended as the waterway's status remains unresolved.

At the intersection of diplomacy and force, the Strait of Hormuz has once again become the world's most consequential chokepoint — closed by Iran on Monday in response to what Tehran calls violations of a fragile peace agreement by the United States and Israel. Oil markets, which had spent the previous week pricing in optimism, reversed sharply as Brent crude climbed toward $81 a barrel, a reminder that energy security and geopolitical trust are inseparable. The episode reveals a deeper pattern: agreements made under pressure tend to fracture at the first test, and the Strait remains less a shipping lane than a barometer of how much the parties actually want peace.

Oil markets lurched higher Monday morning as Iran announced it had closed the Strait of Hormuz, accusing the United States and Israel of violating a fragile interim peace agreement signed just days earlier. Brent crude climbed to $81.11 a barrel and U.S. West Texas Intermediate jumped more than 2.6 percent — a sharp reversal after the previous week had seen prices fall more than 8 percent on hopes of a genuine diplomatic thaw.

The immediate trigger was violence in Lebanon. Israeli strikes killed at least 20 people on Saturday, one day after a ceasefire with Hezbollah was supposed to take effect. Iran cited those strikes, and what it described as American failures to uphold commitments, as justification for closing the waterway. The timing was made stranger still by President Trump, who posted threats of renewed military action against Iran on social media even as Vice President Vance was sitting down with Iranian officials for their first formal talks under the new deal.

The previous week had told a different story. Traders had bet heavily on a lasting opening: stranded Iranian oil cargoes would flow freely, U.S. sanctions would ease, and regional supply would expand. Iraq announced plans to restore production to between 4.2 and 4.3 million barrels per day, while the UAE and Kuwait signaled they would offer more oil to customers. Iran's National Oil Company said over 25 million barrels of Iranian crude had already moved through the virtual blockade.

That momentum collapsed within hours of the closure. Analysts noted that Iran is unlikely to surrender its grip on the Strait — its primary point of leverage — while negotiations remain unsettled. With Israeli operations continuing despite the ceasefire and American signals contradicting themselves, the interim agreement looked less like a foundation than a temporary pause. For oil markets, the message was clear: uncertainty, and the volatility that comes with it, is not going away.

Oil markets jolted higher on Monday morning as the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most critical shipping channels, ground to a near halt. The move came after Iran announced it had closed the waterway again, accusing the United States and Israel of violating terms of a fragile interim peace agreement signed just days earlier. Brent crude futures climbed 54 cents to $81.11 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate jumped 2.64 percent to $78.62, a sharp reversal from the previous week's optimism.

The timing was stark. On Sunday, as U.S. Vice President JD Vance sat down with Iranian officials for their first formal talks under the new deal, President Trump posted threats of renewed military action against Iran on social media. The contradiction was not lost on markets or analysts. Saul Kavonic, head of energy research at MST Marquee, noted that traders had been too quick to assume the Strait would stay open. "Iran is likely to continue to find pretexts to stymie flows through the Strait," he said, "as that remains their only point of leverage into the mid-terms which they are unlikely to let go of."

The immediate trigger was violence in Lebanon. Israeli strikes killed at least 20 people on Saturday, according to Lebanon's state news agency, just one day after a ceasefire with Hezbollah was supposed to take effect. Iran cited these violations as justification for closing the Strait. Tehran also complained that the United States had failed to uphold its own commitment to halt fighting in the region. The ceasefire, meant to end months of escalating conflict, was already fraying.

Last week had told a different story. Oil prices had fallen more than 8 percent as traders bet on a genuine thaw. The expectation was straightforward: stranded Iranian oil cargoes would flow out of the Persian Gulf, U.S. sanctions on Iranian crude would lift as part of the deal, and regional supply would expand. Iraq announced plans to gradually restore production to between 4.2 and 4.3 million barrels per day. The United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Iraq all signaled they would offer more oil to customers. Hamid Bovard, head of Iran's National Oil Company, told state television that over 25 million barrels of Iranian crude had already moved through the virtual blockade since Monday of the previous week.

But the closure of the Strait reversed that momentum in hours. IG market analyst Tony Sycamore warned that Lebanon remained "a serious ongoing threat to both the ceasefire and the reopening of the Strait." The peace deal, it seemed, was holding only as long as both sides refrained from testing it. The moment either did—or appeared to do—the arrangement began to crack. With Trump threatening fresh attacks even as negotiations were underway, and with Israeli operations continuing despite the ceasefire, the interim agreement looked less like a foundation and more like a temporary pause in a much longer conflict. For oil markets, that uncertainty meant volatility would likely persist.

The market's expectation of the opening of the Strait has been premature. Iran is likely to continue to find pretexts to stymie flows through the Strait, as that remains their only point of leverage.
— Saul Kavonic, MST Marquee head of energy research
The situation in Lebanon continues to pose a serious ongoing threat to both the ceasefire and the reopening of the Strait.
— Tony Sycamore, IG market analyst
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur The Globe and Mail ↗
Nous contacter FAQ