On a Monday morning in early November, the price of crude oil fell sharply as a faint thread of diplomacy reappeared between Washington and Tehran after months of war that had already drained the world's reserves of fuel. The relief is real but fragile, the kind that comes when a crowd briefly lowers its voice without yet agreeing on what to say. Beneath the trading screens lies an older human condition: a world that depends on a narrow strait and on the restraint of distant rivals, and that must hope, once again, that words will hold where weapons have not.
Oil Slides Over 6% on US-Iran Diplomacy Hopes, But Supply Risks Linger
Mark
A six percent drop in a day is big. What actually changed over the weekend?
Mimi
Not much on the ground. Rubio said Trump would prefer a peaceful resolution, and there was no major military escalation. Traders had been braced for one.
Luke
So the drop is about expectations, not supply. No new barrels reached the market.
Mimi
Right. And Iran signaled openness too, with talks mediated by Qatar and the supreme leader reportedly approving the pursuit of negotiations.
Luke
That last point comes via IRNA as reported by Trading Economics. It's attributed, not independently confirmed in this piece.
Mark
Why does the Strait of Hormuz matter so much here?
Mimi
A significant share of the world's seaborne oil passes through it. Even the threat of disruption makes traders price in scarcity.
Luke
And inventories are already thin. The ADNOC chief executive said nearly 1 billion barrels have been drawn down. That's one executive's figure, though, relayed through CNBC.
Mark
Is there any good news on supply?
Mimi
Saudi exports rose in October versus September, per two of three tracking firms cited by Reuters. Two of three, so not unanimous.
Luke
And Goldman's $140 forecast for 2027 is conditional on Gulf output staying 3.5 million barrels a day below 2025. It's a scenario, not a prediction that it will happen.
Mark
So what's the honest takeaway?
Mimi
Relief for now, with the midterms on November 3 and reports of possible US action afterward still hanging over it.
Luke
Which, again, come from press reports. Nobody on the record has confirmed that plan.
El Pulso
- Brent crude dropped more than 6% to $106.54 and WTI fell to $97.65 within hours of Washington signaling it preferred a peaceful path with Iran.
- Traders are bracing against the shadow of the November 3 midterms, when fears of renewed US military action could return with force.
- Qatari mediators are shuttling between the two sides as Iran insists any deal must be carried out in practice, not merely promised on paper.
- Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz remains disrupted and attacks on vessels are rising, leaving nearly 1 billion barrels drawn from global stocks.
- Analysts call Monday's drop a pause rather than a reversal, with Goldman Sachs warning Brent could climb to $140 in 2027 if Gulf output stays depressed.
On a Monday morning in early November, the price of crude oil fell sharply as a faint thread of diplomacy reappeared between Washington and Tehran after months of war that had already drained the world's reserves of fuel. The relief is real but fragile, the kind that comes when a crowd briefly lowers its voice without yet agreeing on what to say. Beneath the trading screens lies an older human condition: a world that depends on a narrow strait and on the restraint of distant rivals, and that must hope, once again, that words will hold where weapons have not.
By mid-morning on Monday, Brent crude had fallen 6.07% to $106.54 a barrel, and US West Texas Intermediate had dropped 6.2% to $97.65. The slide came after prices had surged in late October to their highest level in six months, as traders feared the conflict with Iran might escalate once the US midterm elections were over on November 3.
The turn began in Washington. Over the weekend, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said President Trump preferred to settle the conflict through diplomacy, though he did not rule out force. Markets heard in that a willingness to give talks more time. In Tehran, officials said a deal was still possible after two days of Qatar-mediated discussions, though they insisted any agreement must be implemented in practice rather than remain a set of promises.
The oil market is so sensitive because of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow passage through which a large share of the world's seaborne oil flows. Since the war began at the end of February, shipping there has been disrupted, and the world has drawn down nearly 1 billion barrels from stocks. Those depleted reserves explain why prices stayed high even before this week's fall.
The danger has not passed. Reports suggest Washington is preparing for possible renewed military action after the midterms, and Iran's Supreme Leader has ordered a forceful response to any threat. Attacks on ships in the strait have increased. There were some encouraging signs, as Saudi crude exports appeared to rise in October despite Houthi attacks on its energy infrastructure.
Analysts see Monday's move as relief rather than resolution. One trader noted that hopes of diplomatic progress had taken some heat out of prices for now, while another warned that continuing attacks make lasting ceasefires hard to trust. Goldman Sachs has raised its forecasts, saying Brent could reach $140 in 2027 if Gulf output remains well below 2025 levels. What comes next depends on whether the Qatar-mediated talks produce an agreement that holds, and whether tankers return to normal in Hormuz after the vote.
By 8:55 a.m. Eastern on Monday, Brent crude, the international benchmark, had dropped 6.07% to $106.54 a barrel. US West Texas Intermediate fell 6.2% to $97.65, according to CNBC. The slide followed a run at the end of October that took prices to their highest level in six months, driven by worry that the conflict with Iran could intensify after the November 3 US midterm elections.
The immediate trigger was a shift in tone from Washington. Over the weekend, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that President Trump preferred to settle the conflict through diplomacy, though he had not ruled out force. Rubio said the president was confident that the US had the ability and everything it needed to act militarily if necessary, but that it would prefer to do it peacefully. Markets read that as a sign Washington would give diplomacy more time. Trump also reportedly told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he wanted to let diplomacy run before considering renewed military action.
The signals from Tehran were also cautiously open. According to Al Jazeera, Iranian authorities said a deal was still possible after two days of talks mediated by Qatar, but insisted any agreement must be implemented in practice and not remain a set of promises. Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Sunday that the aim was to continue consultations with the Qatari mediators, and that Iran was ready for both defence and diplomacy. Iran's state-run IRNA news agency reported that the supreme leader had approved the government's pursuit of talks to end the war.
The oil market is this sensitive because the Middle East supplies so much of the world's crude, and because of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow channel linking the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman, through which a significant share of seaborne oil passes. The war, which began at the end of February, has already disrupted energy supplies and shipping there. Reuters reported that global inventories have fallen sharply since shipments were interrupted, and the chief executive of Abu Dhabi National Oil Company told CNBC that the world has drawn down nearly 1 billion barrels from stocks since the fighting began. That helps explain why prices stayed high even before this week's drop.
The risks have not gone away. The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times reported that the US was preparing for possible renewed military action after the midterms. On Saturday, Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei told the armed forces to answer any level or type of threat with an immediate, impactful and geographically unrestricted response. Reuters also reported that attacks on ships transiting Hormuz had increased recently.
There were some brighter signs on supply. Two of three ship-tracking companies cited by Reuters showed Saudi Arabia's crude exports rose in October from September, even though Iran-aligned Yemeni Houthis attacked its energy infrastructure.
Analysts framed Monday's move as relief, not a turn. Tim Waterer of KCM Trade told Reuters that lingering hopes of diplomatic progress, plus the lack of any meaningful military escalation over the weekend, had taken some immediate heat out of prices for now. Tamas Varga of PVM Oil Associates pointed to continuing attacks on ships and refineries in the Middle East and on civilians in Ukraine, which he said do little to inspire confidence in lasting ceasefires. "Nonetheless, hope springs eternal," he added.
Goldman Sachs raised its oil price forecasts on Sunday, citing elevated supply risks. It said Brent could reach $140 a barrel in 2027 if Gulf production stays 3.5 million barrels per day below its 2025 average, naming shipping attacks, infrastructure damage and prolonged disruption as the main risks. What to watch is whether the Qatar-mediated talks produce an agreement that holds, and whether tanker traffic through Hormuz returns to normal after the November 3 vote.
Citas Notables
We would prefer to do it peacefully.— Marco Rubio, US Secretary of State
Lingering hopes of some form of diplomatic progress, combined with the absence of any meaningful military escalation over the weekend, have taken some of the immediate heat out of prices for now.— Tim Waterer, KCM Trade, to Reuters
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en The Financial Express ↗
War & Conflict