Oil Rebounds From Two-Month Low as Hormuz Tanker Attacks Outweigh Iran Truce Hopes

Attacks have not slowed.
LSEG analysts warned that even a deal would not quickly restore shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.
Mark

Oil bounced less than one percent. Why does that move deserve attention?

Mimi

Because of where it came from. Prices had just touched two-month lows, and the rebound shows the market isn't ready to bet on peace while ships are still being hit.

Mark

How bad has the shipping situation been?

Mimi

The Washington Institute counted 37 ships attacked in and around the strait in October, the most in any month of the war. Ten more have been logged in November so far.

Luke

Worth noting those counts come from one think tank. The tanker fires on Sunday were verified by video, but the claim that ships used "unauthorised routes" comes from Iranian state media and the Revolutionary Guards.

Mark

So Iran's account of why the tankers were hit is Iran's account.

Luke

Right. The reporting confirms fires and strikes. It doesn't independently establish the routes or the mines.

Mimi

And the analysts' point is that even a deal wouldn't instantly reopen the flow. Mines have to be cleared, insurers have to be comfortable, and owners have to be willing.

Mark

Tuesday's price swing seemed driven by conflicting signals.

Mimi

Yes. US officials played down more strikes, prices fell more than $3, then an Iranian security official said no talks were happening and some of that came back.

Luke

Which means we don't know if talks exist. One side hinted at calm, the other denied negotiations. That's unresolved.

Mark

Anything else pulling on prices?

Mimi

US crude stocks reportedly rose 9 million barrels, and Russian refining is down about 30%, though both figures are from market or industry sources, not official data.

  • Brent climbed 0.78% to $92.20 after sliding to two-month lows, as traders whipsawed between peace rumors and fresh explosions at sea.
  • Ships in the Strait of Hormuz are being struck at a record pace, with 37 attacks in October and ten more already in early November.
  • A Navig8 tanker burned off Oman and two more vessels hit mines on what Iran's Revolutionary Guards called an unauthorized route, leaving shipowners exposed.
  • Prices dropped more than $3 a barrel on US signals of restraint, then clawed back after Tehran denied any talks were underway.
  • Analysts say even a diplomatic breakthrough would need mine clearance and insurance before tanker traffic truly returns, so supply relief remains distant.

On a quiet Wednesday morning, oil markets stepped back up from two-month lows, pulled between a fragile hope that the Iran war might cool and the stubborn fact that ships continue to burn in the Strait of Hormuz. Brent edged to $92.20 a barrel, a small recovery that reflects how much of the world's energy still depends on a narrow passage where violence has become routine. Traders are reading signals that contradict one another, because diplomacy may be whispered about while the sea remains unsafe. The moment speaks to a familiar lesson: a peace agreement on paper does not reopen a waterway until mines are cleared, insurers agree to cover the risk, and sailors decide the journey is worth making.

Oil prices rose a little on Wednesday, recovering from two-month lows reached the day before. Brent futures climbed to $92.20 a barrel, and West Texas Intermediate reached $86.53. The market was torn between hope that the Iran war might ease and clear evidence that tankers in the Strait of Hormuz were still under attack.

The danger on the water has grown sharper. According to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 37 ships were attacked in the strait and nearby waters in October, the highest monthly toll since the war began, and ten more attacks have followed in early November. Video verified by Reuters showed a Navig8 tanker ablaze off Oman. Iran's state broadcaster said three tankers were targeted for using unauthorized routes, and Iran's Revolutionary Guards Navy said others had struck mines.

Tuesday showed how quickly sentiment can turn. Prices fell by more than $3 a barrel after US officials downplayed the need for further strikes, then recovered part of the loss when an Iranian security official said no talks were taking place.

Analysts at LSEG warned that a diplomatic breakthrough alone would not quickly restore supply. Flows through the waterway would depend on clearing mines, lowering insurance costs, and convincing shipowners to accept the risk. For now, the attacks have not slowed, and the question is whether talks materialize and whether vessels begin to return to Hormuz.

Oil prices ticked higher on Wednesday, recovering a little ground after sliding to two-month lows the day before. By 0119 GMT, Brent futures had risen 71 cents, or 0.78%, to $92.20 a barrel. US West Texas Intermediate gained 49 cents, or 0.57%, to $86.53. The market was caught between hopes that the Iran war might de-escalate and the evidence that ships in the Strait of Hormuz were still being hit.

The shipping numbers explain why traders stayed wary. According to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 37 ships were attacked in the Strait of Hormuz and surrounding waters in October. That is the highest monthly total since the war began. Ten more attacks have been recorded so far in November.

The most recent incidents came over the past few days. Videos posted on social media on Sunday and verified by Reuters showed a Navig8 tanker on fire near the coast of Oman. It was one of three tankers hit that day, which Iranian state broadcaster said were targeted for using "unauthorised routes" through the strait. On Tuesday, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations agency reported that another tanker had been struck northeast of Oman's Lima. Iran's Revolutionary Guards Navy said separately that two tankers had caught fire after hitting naval mines on what it called the "unauthorized route."

Tuesday's trading showed how quickly sentiment was turning. Prices initially dropped by more than $3 a barrel after US officials downplayed the need for further military strikes against Iran. They then recovered part of that loss when an Iranian security official said no talks were taking place between the two sides.

Analysts at LSEG argued in a November 10 note that even a diplomatic breakthrough would not quickly fix the supply picture. In their view, any increase in flows through the waterway would still depend on mine clearance, insurance costs, and whether shipowners were willing to take the risk. "Meanwhile, attacks have not slowed," they wrote.

Other supply and demand signals were also in play. Market sources, citing American Petroleum Institute data, said US crude stocks rose by 9 million barrels in the week ended November 6. In Russia, industry sources said refining capacity has been cut by about 30% since late October after renewed Ukrainian drone attacks.

There was also movement on that front. Russian and Ukrainian officials met in Abu Dhabi on Tuesday for their first peace talks since February, as envoys of US President Donald Trump launched a fresh push to end that war.

What to watch next is whether the Iran talks that officials hint at and Tehran denies actually materialize, and whether shipowners begin to send vessels back through Hormuz. With attacks continuing into November, the supply risk has not eased despite the diplomatic signals.

Even in the event a deal is struck, an increase in flows through the waterway would still depend on mine clearance, insurance costs and whether or not shipowners would even be willing to take the risk.
— LSEG analysts, November 10 note
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei Reuters ↗
Kontakt FAQ