At the narrow throat of the Strait of Hormuz, where one-fifth of the world's daily energy supply passes in an unbroken procession of tankers, the ancient contest between nations is once again setting the price of modern life. Brent crude approaches $100 a barrel not merely because oil is scarce, but because fear itself has become a commodity — priced into every barrel by markets that can no longer assume safe passage. Seventy-three people wounded in strikes on Saudi refineries, Iranian threats of retaliation, and Goldman Sachs revising its forecasts through 2027 all point to the same quiet rec
Oil Nears $100 as Middle East Tensions Threaten Strait of Hormuz Shipping
Prices likely to remain high while the waterway remains contested
So we're at $100 because of what's actually happening in the Middle East right now, or because traders think it might happen?
Both. There's real supply tightness—refineries are being hit, tankers are being struck. But the bigger driver is the fear that the Strait of Hormuz will stay contested. One-fifth of global oil moves through there.
How much of that $100 is the geopolitical premium versus actual lost barrels? The source says the premium is having the bigger impact, but it doesn't quantify it.
That's the honest answer—we don't know the exact split. But Waterer is saying the market is pricing in disruption that hasn't fully materialized yet.
And Goldman thinks this lasts into 2027?
They're forecasting $80 Brent for 2027, which assumes the shipping problems continue. They raised their forecasts specifically because they think the Strait stays difficult.
But that's a forecast, not a certainty. A lot depends on whether Iran and the US actually escalate further or find a diplomatic off-ramp.
Right. The market is betting on continued tension. But if there's a ceasefire or a deal, prices could fall fast.
What happens to the people in the region while traders wait?
Seventy-three were wounded in the latest attacks on Saudi energy infrastructure. The violence is real, not just a price signal.
And we don't know the full scope of damage to the refineries or how long repairs will take.
No. The Jizan refinery processes 400,000 barrels a day when it's running. If it stays offline, that's a genuine supply loss on top of the shipping fears.
Il Polso
- Brent crude is nearing $100 a barrel, driven less by physical shortage than by a geopolitical risk premium that grows with every exchange of fire in the Persian Gulf.
- The Jizan refinery — processing 400,000 barrels a day — was struck in a series of attacks that wounded 73 people, turning abstract supply-chain risk into burning infrastructure.
- Iran's threat of retaliation and its announcement of a new, more controlled shipping corridor through the Strait of Hormuz have already slowed tanker traffic, and analysts warn the disruption may stretch well into 2027.
- Goldman Sachs raised its oil forecasts by five dollars for late 2026 and lifted its 2027 outlook, while speculative investors have increased their long positions in Brent — both bets on a conflict with no visible off-ramp.
- The central question is no longer whether prices will stay high, but whether military escalation will find any diplomatic exit before the sustained damage to global energy flows becomes structural.
At the narrow throat of the Strait of Hormuz, where one-fifth of the world's daily energy supply passes in an unbroken procession of tankers, the ancient contest between nations is once again setting the price of modern life. Brent crude approaches $100 a barrel not merely because oil is scarce, but because fear itself has become a commodity — priced into every barrel by markets that can no longer assume safe passage. Seventy-three people wounded in strikes on Saudi refineries, Iranian threats of retaliation, and Goldman Sachs revising its forecasts through 2027 all point to the same quiet reckoning: the world's energy architecture remains as fragile as the peace that is supposed to protect it.
Brent crude is climbing toward $100 a barrel, and analysts are careful to separate two forces driving it: genuine supply tightness, and the fear that oil will become harder to move before it becomes harder to find. Right now, fear is doing most of the work.
The Strait of Hormuz sits at the center of the crisis. Before the conflict began in late February, roughly one-fifth of the world's daily oil and liquefied natural gas supplies moved through this irreplaceable waterway. This week, Iran warned of retaliation against any new American strikes, and shipping traffic slowed again in response — the threat alone was enough to reshape market expectations. Iran also announced plans for a new shipping corridor through the Strait, a signal that tanker traffic will grow more constrained, not less, as the conflict continues.
The immediate trigger was a wave of attacks on Saudi energy infrastructure that wounded 73 people. The Jizan refinery, capable of processing around 400,000 barrels per day and previously targeted by Yemen's Houthi forces, was hit again. These strikes followed a cycle of escalation: Iran's Revolutionary Guards struck American warships in the Persian Gulf, the United States responded by hitting three Iranian oil tankers near Kharg Island — Iran's primary export hub — and each exchange made the next one more probable.
Analysts do not expect a quick return to normal. ANZ's Daniel Hynes said pre-war shipping levels may not recover until late Q1 or into Q2 2027. Goldman Sachs raised its December 2026 Brent forecast to $85 a barrel and its 2027 outlook to $80, betting that Middle East disruptions will persist through next year. Speculative investors have moved in the same direction, increasing net long positions in Brent as hopes for a swift peace deal have faded. The question the market is now asking is not whether oil will stay expensive — it will — but whether the escalation keeping it there will find any off-ramp before the year is out.
Brent crude is climbing toward $100 a barrel, and the reason sits at the intersection of two forces: genuine scarcity and fear. One analyst, Waterer, separated them cleanly—real supply tightness is pushing prices up, but the geopolitical risk premium is doing most of the work. Right now, the market is pricing in the possibility that oil will become harder to move, not just harder to find.
The Strait of Hormuz is why. Before the conflict that began in late February, roughly one-fifth of the world's daily oil and liquefied natural gas supplies flowed through this waterway. It is not replaceable. When shipping through it slows, the entire global energy market feels it. This week, Iran warned it would retaliate against any new American attacks, and shipping traffic through the Strait slowed again in response. The threat alone was enough to reshape expectations. Iran also announced plans to establish a new shipping corridor through the Strait—a move that suggests tanker traffic will become more constrained, not less, as the conflict stretches on.
The immediate trigger was a series of attacks on Saudi energy infrastructure. Seventy-three people were wounded. The Jizan refinery, which processes around 400,000 barrels of crude per day, was hit—it has been targeted before by Yemen's Houthi forces. These were not abstract threats to supply chains; they were direct strikes on the machinery that moves oil to market. The attacks followed a cycle of escalation: Iran's Revolutionary Guards struck American warships in the Persian Gulf, and the United States responded by hitting three Iranian oil tankers, including one near Kharg Island, Iran's primary export hub. Each strike raised the temperature, each retaliation made the next one more likely.
Analysts do not expect the Strait to return to normal quickly. Daniel Hynes at ANZ said a full return to pre-war shipping levels may not arrive until late in the first quarter of 2027 or into the second quarter. That is months away. Goldman Sachs, reading the same tea leaves, raised its oil price forecasts. The bank increased its December 2026 forecast by five dollars, putting Brent at $85 a barrel and WTI at $80. For 2027, Goldman lifted its forecasts to $80 for Brent and $75 for WTI, betting that Middle East shipping problems will persist through next year.
The market itself is moving in the same direction. Speculators have become more bullish on oil as hopes for a quick peace deal have faded. Investors have increased their net long positions in Brent crude, according to ING analysts. They are betting that prices will stay high while the Strait remains contested and diplomatic progress remains fragile. One analyst, Waterer, said plainly: prices are likely to remain elevated for the rest of 2026 if the waterway stays under pressure. The question now is not whether oil will stay expensive, but for how long—and whether the military escalation that is keeping it expensive will find any off-ramp before the end of the year.
Citazioni salienti
Geopolitical risk is currently having the bigger impact on prices than actual supply tightness— Waterer, analyst
A full return to pre-war shipping levels may not happen until late Q1 or early Q2 of 2027— Daniel Hynes, ANZ analyst